The problem of justifying inductive reasoning

In this paper, the author considers the classical strategies of defense from Hume's argument against induction, and assesses the extent to which they were found to be successful. Synthetic, linguistic, a priori, pragmatic, and inductive strategies of defending induction are considered, as well...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Nedeljković Mitar Z.
Format:	article
Language:	EN SR
Published:	Faculty of Philosophy, Kosovska Mitrovica 2021
Subjects:	induction justification philosophy of logic philosophy of science History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
Online Access:	https://doaj.org/article/b81dc560fe7d47c1b0bf5d3772e8fe37
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b81dc560fe7d47c1b0bf5d3772e8fe37
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b81dc560fe7d47c1b0bf5d3772e8fe372021-12-05T21:40:07ZThe problem of justifying inductive reasoning0354-32932217-808210.5937/ZRFFP51-30620https://doaj.org/article/b81dc560fe7d47c1b0bf5d3772e8fe372021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-3293/2021/0354-32932102387N.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/0354-3293https://doaj.org/toc/2217-8082In this paper, the author considers the classical strategies of defense from Hume's argument against induction, and assesses the extent to which they were found to be successful. Synthetic, linguistic, a priori, pragmatic, and inductive strategies of defending induction are considered, as well as the question of the extent to which the justification of induction is a problem for grounding scientific knowledge. A new argument is introduced for the a priori justification of induction, as well as a critique of the synthetic and inductive defenses of induction by Black and Jacquette.Nedeljković Mitar Z.Faculty of Philosophy, Kosovska Mitrovicaarticleinductionjustificationphilosophy of logicphilosophy of scienceHistory of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesAZ20-999ENSRZbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Prištini, Vol 51, Iss 2, Pp 387-408 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN SR
topic	induction justification philosophy of logic philosophy of science History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
spellingShingle	induction justification philosophy of logic philosophy of science History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999 Nedeljković Mitar Z. The problem of justifying inductive reasoning
description	In this paper, the author considers the classical strategies of defense from Hume's argument against induction, and assesses the extent to which they were found to be successful. Synthetic, linguistic, a priori, pragmatic, and inductive strategies of defending induction are considered, as well as the question of the extent to which the justification of induction is a problem for grounding scientific knowledge. A new argument is introduced for the a priori justification of induction, as well as a critique of the synthetic and inductive defenses of induction by Black and Jacquette.
format	article
author	Nedeljković Mitar Z.
author_facet	Nedeljković Mitar Z.
author_sort	Nedeljković Mitar Z.
title	The problem of justifying inductive reasoning
title_short	The problem of justifying inductive reasoning
title_full	The problem of justifying inductive reasoning
title_fullStr	The problem of justifying inductive reasoning
title_full_unstemmed	The problem of justifying inductive reasoning
title_sort	problem of justifying inductive reasoning
publisher	Faculty of Philosophy, Kosovska Mitrovica
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b81dc560fe7d47c1b0bf5d3772e8fe37
work_keys_str_mv	AT nedeljkovicmitarz theproblemofjustifyinginductivereasoning AT nedeljkovicmitarz problemofjustifyinginductivereasoning
_version_	1718370967219077120

The problem of justifying inductive reasoning

Similar Items