Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events

Abstract In everyday situations auditory selective attention requires listeners to suppress task-irrelevant stimuli and to resolve conflicting information in order to make appropriate goal-directed decisions. Traditionally, these two processes (i.e. distractor suppression and conflict resolution) ha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hannah J. Stewart, Sygal Amitay, Claude Alain
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b82b49da4db34bb1868fea4bc2df87a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b82b49da4db34bb1868fea4bc2df87a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b82b49da4db34bb1868fea4bc2df87a42021-12-02T11:41:19ZNeural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events10.1038/s41598-017-00811-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b82b49da4db34bb1868fea4bc2df87a42017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00811-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In everyday situations auditory selective attention requires listeners to suppress task-irrelevant stimuli and to resolve conflicting information in order to make appropriate goal-directed decisions. Traditionally, these two processes (i.e. distractor suppression and conflict resolution) have been studied separately. In the present study we measured neuroelectric activity while participants performed a new paradigm in which both processes are quantified. In separate block of trials, participants indicate whether two sequential tones share the same pitch or location depending on the block’s instruction. For the distraction measure, a positive component peaking at ~250 ms was found – a distraction positivity. Brain electrical source analysis of this component suggests different generators when listeners attended to frequency and location, with the distraction by location more posterior than the distraction by frequency, providing support for the dual-pathway theory. For the conflict resolution measure, a negative frontocentral component (270–450 ms) was found, which showed similarities with that of prior studies on auditory and visual conflict resolution tasks. The timing and distribution are consistent with two distinct neural processes with suppression of task-irrelevant information occurring before conflict resolution. This new paradigm may prove useful in clinical populations to assess impairments in filtering out task-irrelevant information and/or resolving conflicting information.Hannah J. StewartSygal AmitayClaude AlainNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Hannah J. Stewart
Sygal Amitay
Claude Alain
Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events
description Abstract In everyday situations auditory selective attention requires listeners to suppress task-irrelevant stimuli and to resolve conflicting information in order to make appropriate goal-directed decisions. Traditionally, these two processes (i.e. distractor suppression and conflict resolution) have been studied separately. In the present study we measured neuroelectric activity while participants performed a new paradigm in which both processes are quantified. In separate block of trials, participants indicate whether two sequential tones share the same pitch or location depending on the block’s instruction. For the distraction measure, a positive component peaking at ~250 ms was found – a distraction positivity. Brain electrical source analysis of this component suggests different generators when listeners attended to frequency and location, with the distraction by location more posterior than the distraction by frequency, providing support for the dual-pathway theory. For the conflict resolution measure, a negative frontocentral component (270–450 ms) was found, which showed similarities with that of prior studies on auditory and visual conflict resolution tasks. The timing and distribution are consistent with two distinct neural processes with suppression of task-irrelevant information occurring before conflict resolution. This new paradigm may prove useful in clinical populations to assess impairments in filtering out task-irrelevant information and/or resolving conflicting information.
format article
author Hannah J. Stewart
Sygal Amitay
Claude Alain
author_facet Hannah J. Stewart
Sygal Amitay
Claude Alain
author_sort Hannah J. Stewart
title Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events
title_short Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events
title_full Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events
title_fullStr Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events
title_full_unstemmed Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events
title_sort neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/b82b49da4db34bb1868fea4bc2df87a4
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahjstewart neuralcorrelatesofdistractionandconflictresolutionfornonverbalauditoryevents
AT sygalamitay neuralcorrelatesofdistractionandconflictresolutionfornonverbalauditoryevents
AT claudealain neuralcorrelatesofdistractionandconflictresolutionfornonverbalauditoryevents
_version_ 1718395422267932672