A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands
Extensive literature describes the importance of food environments (FEs) as a driver of food choices and nutrition outcomes; yet existing FE frameworks do not adequately capture the diversity of FEs relevant to the Pacific Region. This limits identification of opportunities in food systems to reduce...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d2021-11-25T17:33:08ZA Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands10.3390/foods101125922304-8158https://doaj.org/article/b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/11/2592https://doaj.org/toc/2304-8158Extensive literature describes the importance of food environments (FEs) as a driver of food choices and nutrition outcomes; yet existing FE frameworks do not adequately capture the diversity of FEs relevant to the Pacific Region. This limits identification of opportunities in food systems to reduce the multiple burden of malnutrition. We present a conceptual typology of FEs including six primary FEs relevant in the Pacific; wild; cultivated; kin and community; informal retail; formal retail; and food aid and services. We then apply this typology to food acquisition data from Solomon Islands 2012/13 Household Income and Expenditure Survey and analyse the relationship between FEs and diet quality. The cultivated FE accounts for 60% of the quantity of food acquired nationally, followed by wild (15%), kin and community (9%), and formal and informal retail FEs (8% each), with wide variation between urban and rural households, provinces and wealth groups. Reliance on different FEs is a significant predictor of diet quality and affirms the importance of subsistence fisheries and agriculture, and community and kinship networks. Integration of a FE typology such as the one presented here in commonly conducted household expenditure surveys offers significant opportunity to advance our understanding of food system leverage points to improve nutrition and health.Jessica R. BogardNeil L. AndrewPenny FarrellMario HerreroMichael K. SharpJillian TutuoMDPI AGarticlefood environmentnutritionPacificfood systemdiet qualitySolomon IslandsChemical technologyTP1-1185ENFoods, Vol 10, Iss 2592, p 2592 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
food environment nutrition Pacific food system diet quality Solomon Islands Chemical technology TP1-1185 |
spellingShingle |
food environment nutrition Pacific food system diet quality Solomon Islands Chemical technology TP1-1185 Jessica R. Bogard Neil L. Andrew Penny Farrell Mario Herrero Michael K. Sharp Jillian Tutuo A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands |
description |
Extensive literature describes the importance of food environments (FEs) as a driver of food choices and nutrition outcomes; yet existing FE frameworks do not adequately capture the diversity of FEs relevant to the Pacific Region. This limits identification of opportunities in food systems to reduce the multiple burden of malnutrition. We present a conceptual typology of FEs including six primary FEs relevant in the Pacific; wild; cultivated; kin and community; informal retail; formal retail; and food aid and services. We then apply this typology to food acquisition data from Solomon Islands 2012/13 Household Income and Expenditure Survey and analyse the relationship between FEs and diet quality. The cultivated FE accounts for 60% of the quantity of food acquired nationally, followed by wild (15%), kin and community (9%), and formal and informal retail FEs (8% each), with wide variation between urban and rural households, provinces and wealth groups. Reliance on different FEs is a significant predictor of diet quality and affirms the importance of subsistence fisheries and agriculture, and community and kinship networks. Integration of a FE typology such as the one presented here in commonly conducted household expenditure surveys offers significant opportunity to advance our understanding of food system leverage points to improve nutrition and health. |
format |
article |
author |
Jessica R. Bogard Neil L. Andrew Penny Farrell Mario Herrero Michael K. Sharp Jillian Tutuo |
author_facet |
Jessica R. Bogard Neil L. Andrew Penny Farrell Mario Herrero Michael K. Sharp Jillian Tutuo |
author_sort |
Jessica R. Bogard |
title |
A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands |
title_short |
A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands |
title_full |
A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands |
title_fullStr |
A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands |
title_sort |
typology of food environments in the pacific region and their relationship to diet quality in solomon islands |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jessicarbogard atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT neillandrew atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT pennyfarrell atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT marioherrero atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT michaelksharp atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT jilliantutuo atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT jessicarbogard typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT neillandrew typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT pennyfarrell typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT marioherrero typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT michaelksharp typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands AT jilliantutuo typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands |
_version_ |
1718412248327651328 |