A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands

Extensive literature describes the importance of food environments (FEs) as a driver of food choices and nutrition outcomes; yet existing FE frameworks do not adequately capture the diversity of FEs relevant to the Pacific Region. This limits identification of opportunities in food systems to reduce...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jessica R. Bogard, Neil L. Andrew, Penny Farrell, Mario Herrero, Michael K. Sharp, Jillian Tutuo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d2021-11-25T17:33:08ZA Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands10.3390/foods101125922304-8158https://doaj.org/article/b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/11/2592https://doaj.org/toc/2304-8158Extensive literature describes the importance of food environments (FEs) as a driver of food choices and nutrition outcomes; yet existing FE frameworks do not adequately capture the diversity of FEs relevant to the Pacific Region. This limits identification of opportunities in food systems to reduce the multiple burden of malnutrition. We present a conceptual typology of FEs including six primary FEs relevant in the Pacific; wild; cultivated; kin and community; informal retail; formal retail; and food aid and services. We then apply this typology to food acquisition data from Solomon Islands 2012/13 Household Income and Expenditure Survey and analyse the relationship between FEs and diet quality. The cultivated FE accounts for 60% of the quantity of food acquired nationally, followed by wild (15%), kin and community (9%), and formal and informal retail FEs (8% each), with wide variation between urban and rural households, provinces and wealth groups. Reliance on different FEs is a significant predictor of diet quality and affirms the importance of subsistence fisheries and agriculture, and community and kinship networks. Integration of a FE typology such as the one presented here in commonly conducted household expenditure surveys offers significant opportunity to advance our understanding of food system leverage points to improve nutrition and health.Jessica R. BogardNeil L. AndrewPenny FarrellMario HerreroMichael K. SharpJillian TutuoMDPI AGarticlefood environmentnutritionPacificfood systemdiet qualitySolomon IslandsChemical technologyTP1-1185ENFoods, Vol 10, Iss 2592, p 2592 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic food environment
nutrition
Pacific
food system
diet quality
Solomon Islands
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle food environment
nutrition
Pacific
food system
diet quality
Solomon Islands
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Jessica R. Bogard
Neil L. Andrew
Penny Farrell
Mario Herrero
Michael K. Sharp
Jillian Tutuo
A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands
description Extensive literature describes the importance of food environments (FEs) as a driver of food choices and nutrition outcomes; yet existing FE frameworks do not adequately capture the diversity of FEs relevant to the Pacific Region. This limits identification of opportunities in food systems to reduce the multiple burden of malnutrition. We present a conceptual typology of FEs including six primary FEs relevant in the Pacific; wild; cultivated; kin and community; informal retail; formal retail; and food aid and services. We then apply this typology to food acquisition data from Solomon Islands 2012/13 Household Income and Expenditure Survey and analyse the relationship between FEs and diet quality. The cultivated FE accounts for 60% of the quantity of food acquired nationally, followed by wild (15%), kin and community (9%), and formal and informal retail FEs (8% each), with wide variation between urban and rural households, provinces and wealth groups. Reliance on different FEs is a significant predictor of diet quality and affirms the importance of subsistence fisheries and agriculture, and community and kinship networks. Integration of a FE typology such as the one presented here in commonly conducted household expenditure surveys offers significant opportunity to advance our understanding of food system leverage points to improve nutrition and health.
format article
author Jessica R. Bogard
Neil L. Andrew
Penny Farrell
Mario Herrero
Michael K. Sharp
Jillian Tutuo
author_facet Jessica R. Bogard
Neil L. Andrew
Penny Farrell
Mario Herrero
Michael K. Sharp
Jillian Tutuo
author_sort Jessica R. Bogard
title A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands
title_short A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands
title_full A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands
title_fullStr A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands
title_full_unstemmed A Typology of Food Environments in the Pacific Region and Their Relationship to Diet Quality in Solomon Islands
title_sort typology of food environments in the pacific region and their relationship to diet quality in solomon islands
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b85b286be29443c3949526933153f78d
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicarbogard atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT neillandrew atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT pennyfarrell atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT marioherrero atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT michaelksharp atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT jilliantutuo atypologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT jessicarbogard typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT neillandrew typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT pennyfarrell typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT marioherrero typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT michaelksharp typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
AT jilliantutuo typologyoffoodenvironmentsinthepacificregionandtheirrelationshiptodietqualityinsolomonislands
_version_ 1718412248327651328