A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”

The article provides a diachronic analysis of the concept “money” in the Russian and English linguacultures. The author studies the genesis and development of money in Russia and Great Britain, and conducts a research on the formation of “money” terminology in the corresponding languages. As part of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Y. S. Denisenkova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2013
Materias:	concept money linguacultural studies etymology diachronic analysis International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b88f8de5b82f483596dda14501233a3b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b88f8de5b82f483596dda14501233a3b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b88f8de5b82f483596dda14501233a3b2021-11-23T14:50:55ZA DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-227-231https://doaj.org/article/b88f8de5b82f483596dda14501233a3b2013-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1231https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The article provides a diachronic analysis of the concept “money” in the Russian and English linguacultures. The author studies the genesis and development of money in Russia and Great Britain, and conducts a research on the formation of “money” terminology in the corresponding languages. As part of the study it has been found out that the historical development of the concept “money” in the Russian and English linguacultures has a number of common features: the cores of the concepts, the lexical items «деньги» and “money”are borrowings that entered the vocabularies of the corresponding languages at the same time; the usage of foreign monetary units, in the first place, Byzantine coins, before the introduction of national currencies, influenced “money” terminology, breeding numerous words of foreign origin, as well as the design of money. The article also outlines the etymology of basic monetary units, such as the grzywna, the kuna, the denga, the ruble, the polushka, the kopeck, the altyn ,the chervonets – in Russian, the sterling, the pound, the penny, the shilling, the farthing, the unit, the noble, the sovereign – in English. The author finds a correlation between peculiarities of money development and the evolution of money nomenclature in Russian and English. The concluding section presents similar features and common laws of the concept “money” in the two linguacultures.Y. S. DenisenkovaMGIMO University Pressarticleconceptmoneylinguacultural studiesetymologydiachronic analysisInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 5(32), Pp 227-231 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	concept money linguacultural studies etymology diachronic analysis International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	concept money linguacultural studies etymology diachronic analysis International relations JZ2-6530 Y. S. Denisenkova A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”
description	The article provides a diachronic analysis of the concept “money” in the Russian and English linguacultures. The author studies the genesis and development of money in Russia and Great Britain, and conducts a research on the formation of “money” terminology in the corresponding languages. As part of the study it has been found out that the historical development of the concept “money” in the Russian and English linguacultures has a number of common features: the cores of the concepts, the lexical items «деньги» and “money”are borrowings that entered the vocabularies of the corresponding languages at the same time; the usage of foreign monetary units, in the first place, Byzantine coins, before the introduction of national currencies, influenced “money” terminology, breeding numerous words of foreign origin, as well as the design of money. The article also outlines the etymology of basic monetary units, such as the grzywna, the kuna, the denga, the ruble, the polushka, the kopeck, the altyn ,the chervonets – in Russian, the sterling, the pound, the penny, the shilling, the farthing, the unit, the noble, the sovereign – in English. The author finds a correlation between peculiarities of money development and the evolution of money nomenclature in Russian and English. The concluding section presents similar features and common laws of the concept “money” in the two linguacultures.
format	article
author	Y. S. Denisenkova
author_facet	Y. S. Denisenkova
author_sort	Y. S. Denisenkova
title	A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”
title_short	A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”
title_full	A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”
title_fullStr	A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”
title_full_unstemmed	A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”
title_sort	diachronic analysis of the concept “money”
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/b88f8de5b82f483596dda14501233a3b
work_keys_str_mv	AT ysdenisenkova adiachronicanalysisoftheconceptmoney AT ysdenisenkova diachronicanalysisoftheconceptmoney
_version_	1718416352901857280

A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT “MONEY”

Ejemplares similares