Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict

The 2019 Asrama Papua conflict in Surabaya initiated many discourses on racial discrimination and police brutality towards Papuan students in Indonesia. The question arises as to how the public perceive news framing and its effects on public opinion. This question will be answered by examining repo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Annisa Nadia Putri Harsa, Lily El Ferawati Rofil
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Asia Pacific Network 2021
Materias:	Asrama Indonesia Jubi Kompas media news framing Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b8a8600029094955966840a1f6be3c7b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b8a8600029094955966840a1f6be3c7b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b8a8600029094955966840a1f6be3c7b2021-12-02T15:13:37ZPapua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict10.24135/pjr.v27i1&2.11731023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/b8a8600029094955966840a1f6be3c7b2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1173https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 The 2019 Asrama Papua conflict in Surabaya initiated many discourses on racial discrimination and police brutality towards Papuan students in Indonesia. The question arises as to how the public perceive news framing and its effects on public opinion. This question will be answered by examining reports in the newspapers Kompas (published in Jakarta) and Jubi (Jayapura, Papua) which display quite different thematic and rhetorical structures. As secondary research, this article aims to assess the public opinion on the framing of the incident based on Berger and Luckmann’s Social Construction of Reality. Through qualitative focus group discussion, this study examines people’s perceptions of news media framing and its effect on the shaping of public opinion towards an ethnic minority group. The results show that media framing reinforces a certain idea of public opinion towards minority groups through various factors such as Perspective of Reporting and Depth of Reporting, both of which differ in Kompas and Jubi as a result of differences in their audiences. Differences were also found in such factors as the thematic structure between lens of sympathy and lens of antagonism. Ultimately, this research suggests that the public possess an awareness of news framing, thus giving them the capability to construct their own critical viewpoints towards media and the incident. Annisa Nadia Putri HarsaLily El Ferawati RofilAsia Pacific NetworkarticleAsramaIndonesiaJubiKompasmedianews framingCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 27, Iss 1&2 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Asrama Indonesia Jubi Kompas media news framing Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
spellingShingle	Asrama Indonesia Jubi Kompas media news framing Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Annisa Nadia Putri Harsa Lily El Ferawati Rofil Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict
description	The 2019 Asrama Papua conflict in Surabaya initiated many discourses on racial discrimination and police brutality towards Papuan students in Indonesia. The question arises as to how the public perceive news framing and its effects on public opinion. This question will be answered by examining reports in the newspapers Kompas (published in Jakarta) and Jubi (Jayapura, Papua) which display quite different thematic and rhetorical structures. As secondary research, this article aims to assess the public opinion on the framing of the incident based on Berger and Luckmann’s Social Construction of Reality. Through qualitative focus group discussion, this study examines people’s perceptions of news media framing and its effect on the shaping of public opinion towards an ethnic minority group. The results show that media framing reinforces a certain idea of public opinion towards minority groups through various factors such as Perspective of Reporting and Depth of Reporting, both of which differ in Kompas and Jubi as a result of differences in their audiences. Differences were also found in such factors as the thematic structure between lens of sympathy and lens of antagonism. Ultimately, this research suggests that the public possess an awareness of news framing, thus giving them the capability to construct their own critical viewpoints towards media and the incident.
format	article
author	Annisa Nadia Putri Harsa Lily El Ferawati Rofil
author_facet	Annisa Nadia Putri Harsa Lily El Ferawati Rofil
author_sort	Annisa Nadia Putri Harsa
title	Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict
title_short	Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict
title_full	Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict
title_fullStr	Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict
title_full_unstemmed	Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict
title_sort	papua and the public: news framing of the 2019 asrama papua conflict
publisher	Asia Pacific Network
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b8a8600029094955966840a1f6be3c7b
work_keys_str_mv	AT annisanadiaputriharsa papuaandthepublicnewsframingofthe2019asramapapuaconflict AT lilyelferawatirofil papuaandthepublicnewsframingofthe2019asramapapuaconflict
_version_	1718387595404115968

Papua and the public: News framing of the 2019 Asrama Papua conflict

Ejemplares similares