Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.

<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this phantom study was to minimize the radiation dose by finding the best combination of low tube current and low voltage that would result in accurate volume measurements when compared to standard CT imaging without significantly decreasing the sensitivity...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreas Christe, Zsolt Szucs-Farkas, Adrian Huber, Philipp Steiger, Lars Leidolt, Justus E Roos, Johannes Heverhagen, Lukas Ebner
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b8fae66b2c4f4e2a8e28c37a45f4e863
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b8fae66b2c4f4e2a8e28c37a45f4e863
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b8fae66b2c4f4e2a8e28c37a45f4e8632021-11-18T08:40:24ZOptimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0082919https://doaj.org/article/b8fae66b2c4f4e2a8e28c37a45f4e8632013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24386126/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this phantom study was to minimize the radiation dose by finding the best combination of low tube current and low voltage that would result in accurate volume measurements when compared to standard CT imaging without significantly decreasing the sensitivity of detecting lung nodules both with and without the assistance of CAD.<h4>Methods</h4>An anthropomorphic chest phantom containing artificial solid and ground glass nodules (GGNs, 5-12 mm) was examined with a 64-row multi-detector CT scanner with three tube currents of 100, 50 and 25 mAs in combination with three tube voltages of 120, 100 and 80 kVp. This resulted in eight different protocols that were then compared to standard CT sensitivity (100 mAs/120 kVp). For each protocol, at least 127 different nodules were scanned in 21-25 phantoms. The nodules were analyzed in two separate sessions by three independent, blinded radiologists and computer-aided detection (CAD) software.<h4>Results</h4>The mean sensitivity of the radiologists for identifying solid lung nodules on a standard CT was 89.7% ± 4.9%. The sensitivity was not significantly impaired when the tube and current voltage were lowered at the same time, except at the lowest exposure level of 25 mAs/80 kVp [80.6% ± 4.3% (p = 0.031)]. Compared to the standard CT, the sensitivity for detecting GGNs was significantly lower at all dose levels when the voltage was 80 kVp; this result was independent of the tube current. The CAD significantly increased the radiologists' sensitivity for detecting solid nodules at all dose levels (5-11%). No significant volume measurement errors (VMEs) were documented for the radiologists or the CAD software at any dose level.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Our results suggest a CT protocol with 25 mAs and 100 kVp is optimal for detecting solid and ground glass nodules in lung cancer screening. The use of CAD software is highly recommended at all dose levels.Andreas ChristeZsolt Szucs-FarkasAdrian HuberPhilipp SteigerLars LeidoltJustus E RoosJohannes HeverhagenLukas EbnerPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 12, p e82919 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Andreas Christe
Zsolt Szucs-Farkas
Adrian Huber
Philipp Steiger
Lars Leidolt
Justus E Roos
Johannes Heverhagen
Lukas Ebner
Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.
description <h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this phantom study was to minimize the radiation dose by finding the best combination of low tube current and low voltage that would result in accurate volume measurements when compared to standard CT imaging without significantly decreasing the sensitivity of detecting lung nodules both with and without the assistance of CAD.<h4>Methods</h4>An anthropomorphic chest phantom containing artificial solid and ground glass nodules (GGNs, 5-12 mm) was examined with a 64-row multi-detector CT scanner with three tube currents of 100, 50 and 25 mAs in combination with three tube voltages of 120, 100 and 80 kVp. This resulted in eight different protocols that were then compared to standard CT sensitivity (100 mAs/120 kVp). For each protocol, at least 127 different nodules were scanned in 21-25 phantoms. The nodules were analyzed in two separate sessions by three independent, blinded radiologists and computer-aided detection (CAD) software.<h4>Results</h4>The mean sensitivity of the radiologists for identifying solid lung nodules on a standard CT was 89.7% ± 4.9%. The sensitivity was not significantly impaired when the tube and current voltage were lowered at the same time, except at the lowest exposure level of 25 mAs/80 kVp [80.6% ± 4.3% (p = 0.031)]. Compared to the standard CT, the sensitivity for detecting GGNs was significantly lower at all dose levels when the voltage was 80 kVp; this result was independent of the tube current. The CAD significantly increased the radiologists' sensitivity for detecting solid nodules at all dose levels (5-11%). No significant volume measurement errors (VMEs) were documented for the radiologists or the CAD software at any dose level.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Our results suggest a CT protocol with 25 mAs and 100 kVp is optimal for detecting solid and ground glass nodules in lung cancer screening. The use of CAD software is highly recommended at all dose levels.
format article
author Andreas Christe
Zsolt Szucs-Farkas
Adrian Huber
Philipp Steiger
Lars Leidolt
Justus E Roos
Johannes Heverhagen
Lukas Ebner
author_facet Andreas Christe
Zsolt Szucs-Farkas
Adrian Huber
Philipp Steiger
Lars Leidolt
Justus E Roos
Johannes Heverhagen
Lukas Ebner
author_sort Andreas Christe
title Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.
title_short Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.
title_full Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.
title_fullStr Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.
title_full_unstemmed Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.
title_sort optimal dose levels in screening chest ct for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/b8fae66b2c4f4e2a8e28c37a45f4e863
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaschriste optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT zsoltszucsfarkas optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT adrianhuber optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT philippsteiger optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT larsleidolt optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT justuseroos optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT johannesheverhagen optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
AT lukasebner optimaldoselevelsinscreeningchestctforunimpaireddetectionandvolumetryoflungnoduleswithandwithoutcomputerassisteddetectionatminimalpatientradiation
_version_ 1718421465933545472