How to test for partially predictable chaos
Abstract For a chaotic system pairs of initially close-by trajectories become eventually fully uncorrelated on the attracting set. This process of decorrelation can split into an initial exponential decrease and a subsequent diffusive process on the chaotic attractor causing the final loss of predic...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b961888e2c554dbfbba85764bc8cd2b6 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:b961888e2c554dbfbba85764bc8cd2b6 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:b961888e2c554dbfbba85764bc8cd2b62021-12-02T15:06:13ZHow to test for partially predictable chaos10.1038/s41598-017-01083-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b961888e2c554dbfbba85764bc8cd2b62017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01083-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract For a chaotic system pairs of initially close-by trajectories become eventually fully uncorrelated on the attracting set. This process of decorrelation can split into an initial exponential decrease and a subsequent diffusive process on the chaotic attractor causing the final loss of predictability. Both processes can be either of the same or of very different time scales. In the latter case the two trajectories linger within a finite but small distance (with respect to the overall extent of the attractor) for exceedingly long times and remain partially predictable. Standard tests for chaos widely use inter-orbital correlations as an indicator. However, testing partially predictable chaos yields mostly ambiguous results, as this type of chaos is characterized by attractors of fractally broadened braids. For a resolution we introduce a novel 0–1 indicator for chaos based on the cross-distance scaling of pairs of initially close trajectories. This test robustly discriminates chaos, including partially predictable chaos, from laminar flow. Additionally using the finite time cross-correlation of pairs of initially close trajectories, we are able to identify laminar flow as well as strong and partially predictable chaos in a 0–1 manner solely from the properties of pairs of trajectories.Hendrik WerneckeBulcsú SándorClaudius GrosNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Hendrik Wernecke Bulcsú Sándor Claudius Gros How to test for partially predictable chaos |
description |
Abstract For a chaotic system pairs of initially close-by trajectories become eventually fully uncorrelated on the attracting set. This process of decorrelation can split into an initial exponential decrease and a subsequent diffusive process on the chaotic attractor causing the final loss of predictability. Both processes can be either of the same or of very different time scales. In the latter case the two trajectories linger within a finite but small distance (with respect to the overall extent of the attractor) for exceedingly long times and remain partially predictable. Standard tests for chaos widely use inter-orbital correlations as an indicator. However, testing partially predictable chaos yields mostly ambiguous results, as this type of chaos is characterized by attractors of fractally broadened braids. For a resolution we introduce a novel 0–1 indicator for chaos based on the cross-distance scaling of pairs of initially close trajectories. This test robustly discriminates chaos, including partially predictable chaos, from laminar flow. Additionally using the finite time cross-correlation of pairs of initially close trajectories, we are able to identify laminar flow as well as strong and partially predictable chaos in a 0–1 manner solely from the properties of pairs of trajectories. |
format |
article |
author |
Hendrik Wernecke Bulcsú Sándor Claudius Gros |
author_facet |
Hendrik Wernecke Bulcsú Sándor Claudius Gros |
author_sort |
Hendrik Wernecke |
title |
How to test for partially predictable chaos |
title_short |
How to test for partially predictable chaos |
title_full |
How to test for partially predictable chaos |
title_fullStr |
How to test for partially predictable chaos |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to test for partially predictable chaos |
title_sort |
how to test for partially predictable chaos |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/b961888e2c554dbfbba85764bc8cd2b6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hendrikwernecke howtotestforpartiallypredictablechaos AT bulcsusandor howtotestforpartiallypredictablechaos AT claudiusgros howtotestforpartiallypredictablechaos |
_version_ |
1718388538740834304 |