The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.

Most authors have identified two rapid increases in relative brain size (encephalization quotient, EQ) in cetacean evolution: first at the origin of the modern suborders (odontocetes and mysticetes) around the Eocene-Oligocene transition, and a second at the origin of the delphinoid odontocetes duri...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David A Waugh, J G M Thewissen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b970ed6a57964657bc2339c3e3763769
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b970ed6a57964657bc2339c3e3763769
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b970ed6a57964657bc2339c3e37637692021-12-02T20:14:05ZThe pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257803https://doaj.org/article/b970ed6a57964657bc2339c3e37637692021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257803https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Most authors have identified two rapid increases in relative brain size (encephalization quotient, EQ) in cetacean evolution: first at the origin of the modern suborders (odontocetes and mysticetes) around the Eocene-Oligocene transition, and a second at the origin of the delphinoid odontocetes during the middle Miocene. We explore how methods used to estimate brain and body mass alter this perceived timing and rate of cetacean EQ evolution. We provide new data on modern mammals (mysticetes, odontocetes, and terrestrial artiodactyls) and show that brain mass and endocranial volume scale allometrically, and that endocranial volume is not a direct proxy for brain mass. We demonstrate that inconsistencies in the methods used to estimate body size across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary have caused a spurious pattern in earlier relative brain size studies. Instead, we employ a single method, using occipital condyle width as a skeletal proxy for body mass using a new dataset of extant cetaceans, to clarify this pattern. We suggest that cetacean relative brain size is most accurately portrayed using EQs based on the scaling coefficients as observed in the closely related terrestrial artiodactyls. Finally, we include additional data for an Eocene whale, raising the sample size of Eocene archaeocetes to seven. Our analysis of fossil cetacean EQ is different from previous works which had shown that a sudden increase in EQ coincided with the origin of odontocetes at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary. Instead, our data show that brain size increased at the origin of basilosaurids, 5 million years before the Eocene-Oligocene transition, and we do not observe a significant increase in relative brain size at the origin of odontocetes.David A WaughJ G M ThewissenPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257803 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
David A Waugh
J G M Thewissen
The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.
description Most authors have identified two rapid increases in relative brain size (encephalization quotient, EQ) in cetacean evolution: first at the origin of the modern suborders (odontocetes and mysticetes) around the Eocene-Oligocene transition, and a second at the origin of the delphinoid odontocetes during the middle Miocene. We explore how methods used to estimate brain and body mass alter this perceived timing and rate of cetacean EQ evolution. We provide new data on modern mammals (mysticetes, odontocetes, and terrestrial artiodactyls) and show that brain mass and endocranial volume scale allometrically, and that endocranial volume is not a direct proxy for brain mass. We demonstrate that inconsistencies in the methods used to estimate body size across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary have caused a spurious pattern in earlier relative brain size studies. Instead, we employ a single method, using occipital condyle width as a skeletal proxy for body mass using a new dataset of extant cetaceans, to clarify this pattern. We suggest that cetacean relative brain size is most accurately portrayed using EQs based on the scaling coefficients as observed in the closely related terrestrial artiodactyls. Finally, we include additional data for an Eocene whale, raising the sample size of Eocene archaeocetes to seven. Our analysis of fossil cetacean EQ is different from previous works which had shown that a sudden increase in EQ coincided with the origin of odontocetes at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary. Instead, our data show that brain size increased at the origin of basilosaurids, 5 million years before the Eocene-Oligocene transition, and we do not observe a significant increase in relative brain size at the origin of odontocetes.
format article
author David A Waugh
J G M Thewissen
author_facet David A Waugh
J G M Thewissen
author_sort David A Waugh
title The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.
title_short The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.
title_full The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.
title_fullStr The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.
title_full_unstemmed The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.
title_sort pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b970ed6a57964657bc2339c3e3763769
work_keys_str_mv AT davidawaugh thepatternofbrainsizechangeintheearlyevolutionofcetaceans
AT jgmthewissen thepatternofbrainsizechangeintheearlyevolutionofcetaceans
AT davidawaugh patternofbrainsizechangeintheearlyevolutionofcetaceans
AT jgmthewissen patternofbrainsizechangeintheearlyevolutionofcetaceans
_version_ 1718374730841456640