Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules

Bankruptcy solution methods are widely used and efficient methods for conflict resolution which attract considerable attention in the area of solving conflicts related to water resources. However, most of the related studies have focused on the use of bankruptcy solution methods in solving quantitat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ali Ahani, Hanif Kazerooni
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:	bankruptcy theory conflict resolution water quality Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b971f47b46084b46bf542c73e992c0b9
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b971f47b46084b46bf542c73e992c0b9
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b971f47b46084b46bf542c73e992c0b92021-11-05T17:19:25ZAllocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules2709-80282709-803610.2166/aqua.2021.048https://doaj.org/article/b971f47b46084b46bf542c73e992c0b92021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://aqua.iwaponline.com/content/70/7/971https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8028https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8036Bankruptcy solution methods are widely used and efficient methods for conflict resolution which attract considerable attention in the area of solving conflicts related to water resources. However, most of the related studies have focused on the use of bankruptcy solution methods in solving quantitative water resources conflicts. In this study, four bankruptcy solution rules including proportional (PRO), constrained equal awards (CEA), constrained equal losses (CEL), and Talmud (TAL) rules were used to develop four models to allocate the allowable pollution loads to pollution sources. One of the novel aspects of the current study is to consider the amount of each flow discharge in addition to the pollution concentration of each pollution source. Evaluation of performances of the selected bankruptcy solution rules in a reach of Karun River in Iran showed that the CEA-based model can be considered as the most desirable option for small pollution sources whereas the CEL-based model seems to be the most appropriate option for large pollution sources. The models based on PRO and TAL rules provide results between those of CEA and CEL rules which can be considered as more probable options to reach agreement on between small and large pollution sources.Ali AhaniHanif KazerooniIWA Publishingarticlebankruptcy theoryconflict resolutionwater qualityEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENAqua, Vol 70, Iss 7, Pp 971-983 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	bankruptcy theory conflict resolution water quality Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	bankruptcy theory conflict resolution water quality Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ali Ahani Hanif Kazerooni Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules
description	Bankruptcy solution methods are widely used and efficient methods for conflict resolution which attract considerable attention in the area of solving conflicts related to water resources. However, most of the related studies have focused on the use of bankruptcy solution methods in solving quantitative water resources conflicts. In this study, four bankruptcy solution rules including proportional (PRO), constrained equal awards (CEA), constrained equal losses (CEL), and Talmud (TAL) rules were used to develop four models to allocate the allowable pollution loads to pollution sources. One of the novel aspects of the current study is to consider the amount of each flow discharge in addition to the pollution concentration of each pollution source. Evaluation of performances of the selected bankruptcy solution rules in a reach of Karun River in Iran showed that the CEA-based model can be considered as the most desirable option for small pollution sources whereas the CEL-based model seems to be the most appropriate option for large pollution sources. The models based on PRO and TAL rules provide results between those of CEA and CEL rules which can be considered as more probable options to reach agreement on between small and large pollution sources.
format	article
author	Ali Ahani Hanif Kazerooni
author_facet	Ali Ahani Hanif Kazerooni
author_sort	Ali Ahani
title	Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules
title_short	Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules
title_full	Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules
title_fullStr	Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules
title_full_unstemmed	Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules
title_sort	allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules
publisher	IWA Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b971f47b46084b46bf542c73e992c0b9
work_keys_str_mv	AT aliahani allocationofallowablepollutionloadbyusingthebankruptcysolutionrules AT hanifkazerooni allocationofallowablepollutionloadbyusingthebankruptcysolutionrules
_version_	1718444121692045312

Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules

Ejemplares similares