A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term

The “Ecological Value” (EV) term has been spread in the literature since 1860; however, there is no consensus on its definition and the criteria for its assessment. To identify, assess and summarize the main definitions, criteria, indicators and applications behind the EV term, we performed a system...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: F. Amador-Cruz, B.L. Figueroa-Rangel, M. Olvera-Vargas, M.E. Mendoza
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b9a94b497b6b4ea5a7c3cb9cb9ec5f1a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b9a94b497b6b4ea5a7c3cb9cb9ec5f1a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b9a94b497b6b4ea5a7c3cb9cb9ec5f1a2021-12-01T04:54:37ZA systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107856https://doaj.org/article/b9a94b497b6b4ea5a7c3cb9cb9ec5f1a2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21005215https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XThe “Ecological Value” (EV) term has been spread in the literature since 1860; however, there is no consensus on its definition and the criteria for its assessment. To identify, assess and summarize the main definitions, criteria, indicators and applications behind the EV term, we performed a systematic literature review of 209 articles published over the last 10 years. Methods included documentation of the following data: i) study area, ii) study subject, iii) study object; iv) criteria, indicators and methods used in the analyses, v) applications of the EV term, and vi) if the study was performed in a natural protected area. Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) was conducted to uncover the association among studies regarding the use of EV and to test for homogeneity among the articles publishing research involving EV. A bootstrap technique was used for MCA validation. The main findings exposed the polysemy of the term and the paucity in the definition, mainly derived by the lack of a theoretical framework. Only 74, out of the 209 revised articles, involved numerical analysis to evaluate criteria. The more recurrent criteria were those related with ecological properties (biodiversity, vulnerability) and with functional characteristics (fragmentation, connectivity and resilience). Remote sensing techniques were the more frequent method for the assessment of EV. The main applications in the use of this term were for natural and urban planning, biodiversity conservation and payment for ecosystem services. An explicit heterogeneity among articles, with and without numerical analysis, was denoted by MCA. Finally, we concluded that the EV term is highly related with the intrinsic values of the landscape.F. Amador-CruzB.L. Figueroa-RangelM. Olvera-VargasM.E. MendozaElsevierarticleFieldworkInstrumental valueIntrinsic valueMultivariate analysisPolysemyRemote sensingEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 129, Iss , Pp 107856- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Fieldwork
Instrumental value
Intrinsic value
Multivariate analysis
Polysemy
Remote sensing
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Fieldwork
Instrumental value
Intrinsic value
Multivariate analysis
Polysemy
Remote sensing
Ecology
QH540-549.5
F. Amador-Cruz
B.L. Figueroa-Rangel
M. Olvera-Vargas
M.E. Mendoza
A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term
description The “Ecological Value” (EV) term has been spread in the literature since 1860; however, there is no consensus on its definition and the criteria for its assessment. To identify, assess and summarize the main definitions, criteria, indicators and applications behind the EV term, we performed a systematic literature review of 209 articles published over the last 10 years. Methods included documentation of the following data: i) study area, ii) study subject, iii) study object; iv) criteria, indicators and methods used in the analyses, v) applications of the EV term, and vi) if the study was performed in a natural protected area. Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) was conducted to uncover the association among studies regarding the use of EV and to test for homogeneity among the articles publishing research involving EV. A bootstrap technique was used for MCA validation. The main findings exposed the polysemy of the term and the paucity in the definition, mainly derived by the lack of a theoretical framework. Only 74, out of the 209 revised articles, involved numerical analysis to evaluate criteria. The more recurrent criteria were those related with ecological properties (biodiversity, vulnerability) and with functional characteristics (fragmentation, connectivity and resilience). Remote sensing techniques were the more frequent method for the assessment of EV. The main applications in the use of this term were for natural and urban planning, biodiversity conservation and payment for ecosystem services. An explicit heterogeneity among articles, with and without numerical analysis, was denoted by MCA. Finally, we concluded that the EV term is highly related with the intrinsic values of the landscape.
format article
author F. Amador-Cruz
B.L. Figueroa-Rangel
M. Olvera-Vargas
M.E. Mendoza
author_facet F. Amador-Cruz
B.L. Figueroa-Rangel
M. Olvera-Vargas
M.E. Mendoza
author_sort F. Amador-Cruz
title A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term
title_short A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term
title_full A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term
title_fullStr A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term
title_sort systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the ecological value term
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b9a94b497b6b4ea5a7c3cb9cb9ec5f1a
work_keys_str_mv AT famadorcruz asystematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
AT blfigueroarangel asystematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
AT molveravargas asystematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
AT memendoza asystematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
AT famadorcruz systematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
AT blfigueroarangel systematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
AT molveravargas systematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
AT memendoza systematicreviewonthedefinitioncriteriaindicatorsmethodsandapplicationsbehindtheecologicalvalueterm
_version_ 1718405685676343296