L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne

Technical and scientific expertise has been for the past twenty years in the midst of a number of debates, following controversies in matter on sanitary and environmental risks. Under public influence, the expertise in this matter has had to progress and to offer guaranties of independence, transpar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Geneviève Decrop
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2014
Materias:	natural hazards land movement uncertainty expert assessment prevention crisis Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b9ac51e1dab44ffc9e09d33ed60e1f25
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b9ac51e1dab44ffc9e09d33ed60e1f25
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b9ac51e1dab44ffc9e09d33ed60e1f252021-12-02T10:00:20ZL’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne1492-844210.4000/vertigo.14608https://doaj.org/article/b9ac51e1dab44ffc9e09d33ed60e1f252014-05-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14608https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442Technical and scientific expertise has been for the past twenty years in the midst of a number of debates, following controversies in matter on sanitary and environmental risks. Under public influence, the expertise in this matter has had to progress and to offer guaranties of independence, transparency and reliability of its findings. Strangely, the field of natural hazards remained out of this movement. According to the classical model – legal-rational - the government and its experts have a stranglehold on risk assessment and preventive measures. In France, this model turns on a real « technical magistrature ». However, the expertise in this field is not free of interest ‘interference. The present article reports the case of an opaque organization of expertise on a geological movement, in the Romanche Valley, at South-East of Grenoble, with serious consequences on the exposed people and local economy.In this case, the local communities were completely dependent of the expertise, which runs in a closed circuit. But the problem of expertise has to be replaced in the questioning on public policies of natural risk prevention which are out of step with the new landscape of risk and with its future deals.Geneviève DecropÉditions en environnement VertigOarticlenatural hazardsland movementuncertaintyexpertassessmentprevention crisisEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 14, Iss 1 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	natural hazards land movement uncertainty expert assessment prevention crisis Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	natural hazards land movement uncertainty expert assessment prevention crisis Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geneviève Decrop L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne
description	Technical and scientific expertise has been for the past twenty years in the midst of a number of debates, following controversies in matter on sanitary and environmental risks. Under public influence, the expertise in this matter has had to progress and to offer guaranties of independence, transparency and reliability of its findings. Strangely, the field of natural hazards remained out of this movement. According to the classical model – legal-rational - the government and its experts have a stranglehold on risk assessment and preventive measures. In France, this model turns on a real « technical magistrature ». However, the expertise in this field is not free of interest ‘interference. The present article reports the case of an opaque organization of expertise on a geological movement, in the Romanche Valley, at South-East of Grenoble, with serious consequences on the exposed people and local economy.In this case, the local communities were completely dependent of the expertise, which runs in a closed circuit. But the problem of expertise has to be replaced in the questioning on public policies of natural risk prevention which are out of step with the new landscape of risk and with its future deals.
format	article
author	Geneviève Decrop
author_facet	Geneviève Decrop
author_sort	Geneviève Decrop
title	L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne
title_short	L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne
title_full	L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne
title_fullStr	L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne
title_full_unstemmed	L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne
title_sort	l’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des ruines de séchilienne
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/b9ac51e1dab44ffc9e09d33ed60e1f25
work_keys_str_mv	AT genevievedecrop lexpertiseenquestiondanslagestiondesrisquesnaturelslecasdesruinesdesechilienne
_version_	1718397820789063680

L’expertise en question dans la gestion des risques naturels : le cas des Ruines de Séchilienne

Ejemplares similares