A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority

This article focuses on academic publication on hate speech within Indonesia’s scholarly context. The authors analyse the ongoing discourse on hate speech by conducting a meta-analysis method on Garuda, an official website designed for repository of scholarly publications in Indonesia. By examined...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Justito Adiprasetio, Detta Rahmawan, Kunto Adi Wibowo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b9ba02baacf541eeb179ea1ff1559cfb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b9ba02baacf541eeb179ea1ff1559cfb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b9ba02baacf541eeb179ea1ff1559cfb2021-12-02T17:28:08ZA meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority10.24135/pjr.v27i1&2.11671023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/b9ba02baacf541eeb179ea1ff1559cfb2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1167https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 This article focuses on academic publication on hate speech within Indonesia’s scholarly context. The authors analyse the ongoing discourse on hate speech by conducting a meta-analysis method on Garuda, an official website designed for repository of scholarly publications in Indonesia. By examined 143 scientific articles, this study found that most studies refer to the definition of hate speech from the Circular No. SE/06/X2015 on hate speech issued by the Indonesian National Police which shows how most Indonesian academics were comfortable in using limited perspectives on hate speech. Furthermore, the variety of the studies on hate speech comes from law or legal studies and communication or da'wah communication. Most Indonesia academics also conducted studies on hate speech with a juridical normative approach, as well as qualitative research. Intriguingly, some studies have been done with unclear method and approaches. Academics ideally should serve as one of the critics for people in power and government apparatus, for example by continuing to question how hate speech is studied, including in the context of its definition and how it affects the implementation in Indonesia. Hence, the authors urged Indonesian academics to do more studies on hate speech from various backgrounds with more rigorous and various research methods to be able to expand the knowledge on hate speech cases in Indonesia. Justito AdiprasetioDetta RahmawanKunto Adi WibowoAsia Pacific Networkarticlecommunicationdefamationdiscourse analysisfreedom of expressionfreedom of speechhate speechCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 27, Iss 1&2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic communication
defamation
discourse analysis
freedom of expression
freedom of speech
hate speech
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle communication
defamation
discourse analysis
freedom of expression
freedom of speech
hate speech
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Justito Adiprasetio
Detta Rahmawan
Kunto Adi Wibowo
A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority
description This article focuses on academic publication on hate speech within Indonesia’s scholarly context. The authors analyse the ongoing discourse on hate speech by conducting a meta-analysis method on Garuda, an official website designed for repository of scholarly publications in Indonesia. By examined 143 scientific articles, this study found that most studies refer to the definition of hate speech from the Circular No. SE/06/X2015 on hate speech issued by the Indonesian National Police which shows how most Indonesian academics were comfortable in using limited perspectives on hate speech. Furthermore, the variety of the studies on hate speech comes from law or legal studies and communication or da'wah communication. Most Indonesia academics also conducted studies on hate speech with a juridical normative approach, as well as qualitative research. Intriguingly, some studies have been done with unclear method and approaches. Academics ideally should serve as one of the critics for people in power and government apparatus, for example by continuing to question how hate speech is studied, including in the context of its definition and how it affects the implementation in Indonesia. Hence, the authors urged Indonesian academics to do more studies on hate speech from various backgrounds with more rigorous and various research methods to be able to expand the knowledge on hate speech cases in Indonesia.
format article
author Justito Adiprasetio
Detta Rahmawan
Kunto Adi Wibowo
author_facet Justito Adiprasetio
Detta Rahmawan
Kunto Adi Wibowo
author_sort Justito Adiprasetio
title A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority
title_short A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority
title_full A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority
title_sort meta-analysis of hate speech in indonesia: the yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b9ba02baacf541eeb179ea1ff1559cfb
work_keys_str_mv AT justitoadiprasetio ametaanalysisofhatespeechinindonesiatheyieldingofanacademicdiscoursetothediscourseofauthority
AT dettarahmawan ametaanalysisofhatespeechinindonesiatheyieldingofanacademicdiscoursetothediscourseofauthority
AT kuntoadiwibowo ametaanalysisofhatespeechinindonesiatheyieldingofanacademicdiscoursetothediscourseofauthority
AT justitoadiprasetio metaanalysisofhatespeechinindonesiatheyieldingofanacademicdiscoursetothediscourseofauthority
AT dettarahmawan metaanalysisofhatespeechinindonesiatheyieldingofanacademicdiscoursetothediscourseofauthority
AT kuntoadiwibowo metaanalysisofhatespeechinindonesiatheyieldingofanacademicdiscoursetothediscourseofauthority
_version_ 1718380750869364736