Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures

Abstract Objective Body mass index (BMI) is used to identify trajectories of adiposity in youth, but it does not distinguish fat‐ from fat‐free‐mass. There are other inexpensive measures of adiposity which might better capture fat‐mass in youth The objective of this study is to examine differences b...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marie‐Pierre Sylvestre, Marilyn N. Ahun, Jennifer O'Loughlin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
BMI
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b9bc0865e82344ec97d7f3cb32f590aa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b9bc0865e82344ec97d7f3cb32f590aa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b9bc0865e82344ec97d7f3cb32f590aa2021-12-01T08:57:17ZRevisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures2055-223810.1002/osp4.538https://doaj.org/article/b9bc0865e82344ec97d7f3cb32f590aa2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.538https://doaj.org/toc/2055-2238Abstract Objective Body mass index (BMI) is used to identify trajectories of adiposity in youth, but it does not distinguish fat‐ from fat‐free‐mass. There are other inexpensive measures of adiposity which might better capture fat‐mass in youth The objective of this study is to examine differences between sex‐specific trajectories of BMI and other adiposity indicators (subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness, waist circumference, waist‐to‐height ratio) which may better capture fat‐mass in youth. Methods Data come from four cycles of a longitudinal cohort of 1293 students in Montréal, Canada at ages 12, 15, 17 and 24. Group‐based trajectory models identified sex‐specific adiposity trajectories among participants with data in ≥3 cycles (n = 417 males; n = 445 females). Results There were six trajectory groups in males and females for all five indicators, except for waist circumference (seven) in both sexes and triceps skinfold thickness (four) and waist‐to‐height ratio (five) in females. Most trajectories indicated linear increases; only the skinfold thickness indicators identified a decreasing trajectory. While all indicators identified a trajectory with high levels of adiposity, they differed in the number and relative size of trajectories pertaining to individuals in lower half of the adiposity distribution. Conclusion BMI is a satisfactory indicator of adiposity in youth if the aim of the trajectory analysis is to identify youth with excess adiposity, a known risk factor for cardiometabolic outcomes in adulthood.Marie‐Pierre SylvestreMarilyn N. AhunJennifer O'LoughlinWileyarticleadiposityadolescenceBMIgroup‐based trajectoriesyoung adulthoodInternal medicineRC31-1245ENObesity Science & Practice, Vol 7, Iss 6, Pp 711-718 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic adiposity
adolescence
BMI
group‐based trajectories
young adulthood
Internal medicine
RC31-1245
spellingShingle adiposity
adolescence
BMI
group‐based trajectories
young adulthood
Internal medicine
RC31-1245
Marie‐Pierre Sylvestre
Marilyn N. Ahun
Jennifer O'Loughlin
Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures
description Abstract Objective Body mass index (BMI) is used to identify trajectories of adiposity in youth, but it does not distinguish fat‐ from fat‐free‐mass. There are other inexpensive measures of adiposity which might better capture fat‐mass in youth The objective of this study is to examine differences between sex‐specific trajectories of BMI and other adiposity indicators (subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness, waist circumference, waist‐to‐height ratio) which may better capture fat‐mass in youth. Methods Data come from four cycles of a longitudinal cohort of 1293 students in Montréal, Canada at ages 12, 15, 17 and 24. Group‐based trajectory models identified sex‐specific adiposity trajectories among participants with data in ≥3 cycles (n = 417 males; n = 445 females). Results There were six trajectory groups in males and females for all five indicators, except for waist circumference (seven) in both sexes and triceps skinfold thickness (four) and waist‐to‐height ratio (five) in females. Most trajectories indicated linear increases; only the skinfold thickness indicators identified a decreasing trajectory. While all indicators identified a trajectory with high levels of adiposity, they differed in the number and relative size of trajectories pertaining to individuals in lower half of the adiposity distribution. Conclusion BMI is a satisfactory indicator of adiposity in youth if the aim of the trajectory analysis is to identify youth with excess adiposity, a known risk factor for cardiometabolic outcomes in adulthood.
format article
author Marie‐Pierre Sylvestre
Marilyn N. Ahun
Jennifer O'Loughlin
author_facet Marie‐Pierre Sylvestre
Marilyn N. Ahun
Jennifer O'Loughlin
author_sort Marie‐Pierre Sylvestre
title Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures
title_short Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures
title_full Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures
title_fullStr Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in‐depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures
title_sort revisiting trajectories of bmi in youth: an in‐depth analysis of differences between bmi and other adiposity measures
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b9bc0865e82344ec97d7f3cb32f590aa
work_keys_str_mv AT mariepierresylvestre revisitingtrajectoriesofbmiinyouthanindepthanalysisofdifferencesbetweenbmiandotheradipositymeasures
AT marilynnahun revisitingtrajectoriesofbmiinyouthanindepthanalysisofdifferencesbetweenbmiandotheradipositymeasures
AT jenniferoloughlin revisitingtrajectoriesofbmiinyouthanindepthanalysisofdifferencesbetweenbmiandotheradipositymeasures
_version_ 1718405376179699712