Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5

Abstract Bile acids are recognised as bioactive signalling molecules. While they are known to influence arrhythmia susceptibility in cholestasis, there is limited knowledge about the underlying mechanisms. To delineate mechanisms underlying fetal heart rhythm disturbances in cholestatic pregnancy, w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Effendi Ibrahim, Ivan Diakonov, Dulasi Arunthavarajah, Teresa Swift, Mary Goodwin, Saraid McIlvride, Vanya Nikolova, Catherine Williamson, Julia Gorelik
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b9f80aa5866a41af9eb558fcc06bf458
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b9f80aa5866a41af9eb558fcc06bf458
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b9f80aa5866a41af9eb558fcc06bf4582021-12-02T12:32:35ZBile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR510.1038/s41598-018-25569-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b9f80aa5866a41af9eb558fcc06bf4582018-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25569-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Bile acids are recognised as bioactive signalling molecules. While they are known to influence arrhythmia susceptibility in cholestasis, there is limited knowledge about the underlying mechanisms. To delineate mechanisms underlying fetal heart rhythm disturbances in cholestatic pregnancy, we used FRET microscopy to monitor cAMP release and contraction measurements in isolated rodent neonatal cardiomyocytes. The unconjugated bile acids CDCA, DCA and UDCA and, to a lesser extent, CA were found to be relatively potent agonists for the GPBAR1 (TGR5) receptor and elicit cAMP release, whereas all glyco- and tauro- conjugated bile acids are weak agonists. The bile acid-induced cAMP production does not lead to an increase in contraction rate, and seems to be mediated by the RI isoform of adenylate cyclase, unlike adrenaline-dependent release which is mediated by the RII isoform. In contrast, bile acids elicited slowing of neonatal cardiomyocyte contraction indicating that other signalling pathways are involved. The conjugated bile acids were found to be partial agonists of the muscarinic M2, but not sphingosin-1-phosphate-2, receptors, and act partially through the Gi pathway. Furthermore, the contraction slowing effect of unconjugated bile acids may also relate to cytotoxicity at higher concentrations.Effendi IbrahimIvan DiakonovDulasi ArunthavarajahTeresa SwiftMary GoodwinSaraid McIlvrideVanya NikolovaCatherine WilliamsonJulia GorelikNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Effendi Ibrahim
Ivan Diakonov
Dulasi Arunthavarajah
Teresa Swift
Mary Goodwin
Saraid McIlvride
Vanya Nikolova
Catherine Williamson
Julia Gorelik
Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5
description Abstract Bile acids are recognised as bioactive signalling molecules. While they are known to influence arrhythmia susceptibility in cholestasis, there is limited knowledge about the underlying mechanisms. To delineate mechanisms underlying fetal heart rhythm disturbances in cholestatic pregnancy, we used FRET microscopy to monitor cAMP release and contraction measurements in isolated rodent neonatal cardiomyocytes. The unconjugated bile acids CDCA, DCA and UDCA and, to a lesser extent, CA were found to be relatively potent agonists for the GPBAR1 (TGR5) receptor and elicit cAMP release, whereas all glyco- and tauro- conjugated bile acids are weak agonists. The bile acid-induced cAMP production does not lead to an increase in contraction rate, and seems to be mediated by the RI isoform of adenylate cyclase, unlike adrenaline-dependent release which is mediated by the RII isoform. In contrast, bile acids elicited slowing of neonatal cardiomyocyte contraction indicating that other signalling pathways are involved. The conjugated bile acids were found to be partial agonists of the muscarinic M2, but not sphingosin-1-phosphate-2, receptors, and act partially through the Gi pathway. Furthermore, the contraction slowing effect of unconjugated bile acids may also relate to cytotoxicity at higher concentrations.
format article
author Effendi Ibrahim
Ivan Diakonov
Dulasi Arunthavarajah
Teresa Swift
Mary Goodwin
Saraid McIlvride
Vanya Nikolova
Catherine Williamson
Julia Gorelik
author_facet Effendi Ibrahim
Ivan Diakonov
Dulasi Arunthavarajah
Teresa Swift
Mary Goodwin
Saraid McIlvride
Vanya Nikolova
Catherine Williamson
Julia Gorelik
author_sort Effendi Ibrahim
title Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5
title_short Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5
title_full Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5
title_fullStr Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5
title_full_unstemmed Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5
title_sort bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of gi protein, muscarinic receptors and tgr5
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/b9f80aa5866a41af9eb558fcc06bf458
work_keys_str_mv AT effendiibrahim bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT ivandiakonov bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT dulasiarunthavarajah bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT teresaswift bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT marygoodwin bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT saraidmcilvride bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT vanyanikolova bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT catherinewilliamson bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
AT juliagorelik bileacidsandtheirrespectiveconjugateselicitdifferentresponsesinneonatalcardiomyocytesroleofgiproteinmuscarinicreceptorsandtgr5
_version_ 1718394058258251776