A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>

A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matěj Pánek, Aleš Hanáček, Jana Wenzlová, Marie Maňasová, Miloslav Zouhar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry plants against <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> was performed. The experiment was performed on strawberry cultivars Sonata, Karmen, and Wendy—cultivated in a cultivating room and greenhouse. The health of plants was affected negatively by the pathogen in all variants of biological agents used, but differences were seen in the rates of this decrease. The results revealed the ability of some tested agents to improve the growth of plants in the absence of the pathogen; the preparation Polyversum (<i>Pythium oligandrum</i>) was the most beneficial, in both the presence and absence of the pathogen. Contrarily, some agents alone decreased the health of plants; Integral Pro (<i>Bacillus subtillis</i>) and a strain of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. caused a deterioration in the health of the plants, even in the absence of a pathogen. The results of our analysis demonstrate the varied usefulness of all agents under unified environmental conditions; their effect seems to be dependent on the conditions and on the combination of the genotypes of all three participants in the interaction: plant–pathogen–antagonist.