A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>

A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matěj Pánek, Aleš Hanáček, Jana Wenzlová, Marie Maňasová, Miloslav Zouhar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c02021-11-25T15:58:57ZA Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>10.3390/agriculture111110862077-0472https://doaj.org/article/ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/11/1086https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0472A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry plants against <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> was performed. The experiment was performed on strawberry cultivars Sonata, Karmen, and Wendy—cultivated in a cultivating room and greenhouse. The health of plants was affected negatively by the pathogen in all variants of biological agents used, but differences were seen in the rates of this decrease. The results revealed the ability of some tested agents to improve the growth of plants in the absence of the pathogen; the preparation Polyversum (<i>Pythium oligandrum</i>) was the most beneficial, in both the presence and absence of the pathogen. Contrarily, some agents alone decreased the health of plants; Integral Pro (<i>Bacillus subtillis</i>) and a strain of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. caused a deterioration in the health of the plants, even in the absence of a pathogen. The results of our analysis demonstrate the varied usefulness of all agents under unified environmental conditions; their effect seems to be dependent on the conditions and on the combination of the genotypes of all three participants in the interaction: plant–pathogen–antagonist.Matěj PánekAleš HanáčekJana WenzlováMarie MaňasováMiloslav ZouharMDPI AGarticlebiological protectionblack root rotbiological control agentsPythiaceaeAgriculture (General)S1-972ENAgriculture, Vol 11, Iss 1086, p 1086 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic biological protection
black root rot
biological control agents
Pythiaceae
Agriculture (General)
S1-972
spellingShingle biological protection
black root rot
biological control agents
Pythiaceae
Agriculture (General)
S1-972
Matěj Pánek
Aleš Hanáček
Jana Wenzlová
Marie Maňasová
Miloslav Zouhar
A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>
description A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry plants against <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> was performed. The experiment was performed on strawberry cultivars Sonata, Karmen, and Wendy—cultivated in a cultivating room and greenhouse. The health of plants was affected negatively by the pathogen in all variants of biological agents used, but differences were seen in the rates of this decrease. The results revealed the ability of some tested agents to improve the growth of plants in the absence of the pathogen; the preparation Polyversum (<i>Pythium oligandrum</i>) was the most beneficial, in both the presence and absence of the pathogen. Contrarily, some agents alone decreased the health of plants; Integral Pro (<i>Bacillus subtillis</i>) and a strain of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. caused a deterioration in the health of the plants, even in the absence of a pathogen. The results of our analysis demonstrate the varied usefulness of all agents under unified environmental conditions; their effect seems to be dependent on the conditions and on the combination of the genotypes of all three participants in the interaction: plant–pathogen–antagonist.
format article
author Matěj Pánek
Aleš Hanáček
Jana Wenzlová
Marie Maňasová
Miloslav Zouhar
author_facet Matěj Pánek
Aleš Hanáček
Jana Wenzlová
Marie Maňasová
Miloslav Zouhar
author_sort Matěj Pánek
title A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>
title_short A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>
title_full A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>
title_sort comparison of the ability of some commercially produced biological control agents to protect strawberry plants against the plant pathogen <i>phytophthora cactorum</i>
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c0
work_keys_str_mv AT matejpanek acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT aleshanacek acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT janawenzlova acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT mariemanasova acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT miloslavzouhar acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT matejpanek comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT aleshanacek comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT janawenzlova comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT mariemanasova comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
AT miloslavzouhar comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi
_version_ 1718413403398078464