A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>
A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry p...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c0 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c02021-11-25T15:58:57ZA Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i>10.3390/agriculture111110862077-0472https://doaj.org/article/ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/11/1086https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0472A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry plants against <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> was performed. The experiment was performed on strawberry cultivars Sonata, Karmen, and Wendy—cultivated in a cultivating room and greenhouse. The health of plants was affected negatively by the pathogen in all variants of biological agents used, but differences were seen in the rates of this decrease. The results revealed the ability of some tested agents to improve the growth of plants in the absence of the pathogen; the preparation Polyversum (<i>Pythium oligandrum</i>) was the most beneficial, in both the presence and absence of the pathogen. Contrarily, some agents alone decreased the health of plants; Integral Pro (<i>Bacillus subtillis</i>) and a strain of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. caused a deterioration in the health of the plants, even in the absence of a pathogen. The results of our analysis demonstrate the varied usefulness of all agents under unified environmental conditions; their effect seems to be dependent on the conditions and on the combination of the genotypes of all three participants in the interaction: plant–pathogen–antagonist.Matěj PánekAleš HanáčekJana WenzlováMarie MaňasováMiloslav ZouharMDPI AGarticlebiological protectionblack root rotbiological control agentsPythiaceaeAgriculture (General)S1-972ENAgriculture, Vol 11, Iss 1086, p 1086 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
biological protection black root rot biological control agents Pythiaceae Agriculture (General) S1-972 |
spellingShingle |
biological protection black root rot biological control agents Pythiaceae Agriculture (General) S1-972 Matěj Pánek Aleš Hanáček Jana Wenzlová Marie Maňasová Miloslav Zouhar A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> |
description |
A comparison of the ability of commercially produced biological control agents—Contans, Gliorex, Hirundo, Polyversum, Prometheus, Clonoplus, Integral Pro and Xilon GR, completed with an isolate of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> and of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp.—to protect strawberry plants against <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> was performed. The experiment was performed on strawberry cultivars Sonata, Karmen, and Wendy—cultivated in a cultivating room and greenhouse. The health of plants was affected negatively by the pathogen in all variants of biological agents used, but differences were seen in the rates of this decrease. The results revealed the ability of some tested agents to improve the growth of plants in the absence of the pathogen; the preparation Polyversum (<i>Pythium oligandrum</i>) was the most beneficial, in both the presence and absence of the pathogen. Contrarily, some agents alone decreased the health of plants; Integral Pro (<i>Bacillus subtillis</i>) and a strain of <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. caused a deterioration in the health of the plants, even in the absence of a pathogen. The results of our analysis demonstrate the varied usefulness of all agents under unified environmental conditions; their effect seems to be dependent on the conditions and on the combination of the genotypes of all three participants in the interaction: plant–pathogen–antagonist. |
format |
article |
author |
Matěj Pánek Aleš Hanáček Jana Wenzlová Marie Maňasová Miloslav Zouhar |
author_facet |
Matěj Pánek Aleš Hanáček Jana Wenzlová Marie Maňasová Miloslav Zouhar |
author_sort |
Matěj Pánek |
title |
A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> |
title_short |
A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> |
title_full |
A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of the Ability of Some Commercially Produced Biological Control Agents to Protect Strawberry Plants against the Plant Pathogen <i>Phytophthora cactorum</i> |
title_sort |
comparison of the ability of some commercially produced biological control agents to protect strawberry plants against the plant pathogen <i>phytophthora cactorum</i> |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/ba632b57689e4a7da40ce8ed58a2a9c0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matejpanek acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT aleshanacek acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT janawenzlova acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT mariemanasova acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT miloslavzouhar acomparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT matejpanek comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT aleshanacek comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT janawenzlova comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT mariemanasova comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi AT miloslavzouhar comparisonoftheabilityofsomecommerciallyproducedbiologicalcontrolagentstoprotectstrawberryplantsagainsttheplantpathogeniphytophthoracactorumi |
_version_ |
1718413403398078464 |