Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

<h4>Background</h4>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common postoperative complications. Whether the use of staples or sutures makes a difference in abdominal surgery's infection rate remains elusive.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review was performed to identify randomi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juntao Feng, Xiaoli Jiang, Zhifu Zhi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ba6653d390a540a081572992258e57bc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ba6653d390a540a081572992258e57bc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ba6653d390a540a081572992258e57bc2021-11-25T06:19:21ZSubcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0251022https://doaj.org/article/ba6653d390a540a081572992258e57bc2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251022https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common postoperative complications. Whether the use of staples or sutures makes a difference in abdominal surgery's infection rate remains elusive.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials comparing staples and sutures after abdominal surgeries. Eligibility criteria involved the SSI occurrence as the primary outcome and the incidence of wound dehiscence, closure time, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction as the secondary outcomes.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 278 studies identified, seven randomized controlled trials representing 3705 patients were included in this review. There was no significant difference in SSI rates between sutures and staples in general (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.79-1.22, I2 = 44%, P = 0.1) or in a subgroup of gastrointestinal surgery, where subcuticular suturing was found with a comparable SSI risk with skin stapling (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.66-1.09). Staple closure was associated with a shorter surgery duration, whereas sutures appeared to provide better cosmesis and patient satisfaction. Sutures and staples achieved a comparable incidence of dehiscence. There was no significant between-study publication bias.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our study demonstrated similar outcomes in SSI rate between subcuticular sutures and staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.Juntao FengXiaoli JiangZhifu ZhiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0251022 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Juntao Feng
Xiaoli Jiang
Zhifu Zhi
Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
description <h4>Background</h4>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common postoperative complications. Whether the use of staples or sutures makes a difference in abdominal surgery's infection rate remains elusive.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials comparing staples and sutures after abdominal surgeries. Eligibility criteria involved the SSI occurrence as the primary outcome and the incidence of wound dehiscence, closure time, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction as the secondary outcomes.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 278 studies identified, seven randomized controlled trials representing 3705 patients were included in this review. There was no significant difference in SSI rates between sutures and staples in general (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.79-1.22, I2 = 44%, P = 0.1) or in a subgroup of gastrointestinal surgery, where subcuticular suturing was found with a comparable SSI risk with skin stapling (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.66-1.09). Staple closure was associated with a shorter surgery duration, whereas sutures appeared to provide better cosmesis and patient satisfaction. Sutures and staples achieved a comparable incidence of dehiscence. There was no significant between-study publication bias.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our study demonstrated similar outcomes in SSI rate between subcuticular sutures and staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
format article
author Juntao Feng
Xiaoli Jiang
Zhifu Zhi
author_facet Juntao Feng
Xiaoli Jiang
Zhifu Zhi
author_sort Juntao Feng
title Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ba6653d390a540a081572992258e57bc
work_keys_str_mv AT juntaofeng subcuticularsuturesversusstaplesforskinclosureinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaolijiang subcuticularsuturesversusstaplesforskinclosureinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhifuzhi subcuticularsuturesversusstaplesforskinclosureinpatientsundergoingabdominalsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1718413887531909120