Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)

The present research featured the semantics of expressivity of comparative phraseological units (CPU) in English, German, Russian, and Urdu. The authors studied the lexical components of comparative constructions in order to define the universal and the national in these languages. Comparative idiom...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	N. V. Bhatti, E. V. Kovsh, E. Yu. Kharitonova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Kemerovo State University 2021
Materias:	comparative phraseological unit semantic group meronym universal linguacultural symbol national linguistic culture semantic category associative image History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics DK1-4735 Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ba8f370e129e49828ff9b6ca709c6681
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ba8f370e129e49828ff9b6ca709c6681
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ba8f370e129e49828ff9b6ca709c66812021-11-17T02:43:10ZCulturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)2078-89752078-898310.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-760-772https://doaj.org/article/ba8f370e129e49828ff9b6ca709c66812021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/5055https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983The present research featured the semantics of expressivity of comparative phraseological units (CPU) in English, German, Russian, and Urdu. The authors studied the lexical components of comparative constructions in order to define the universal and the national in these languages. Comparative idioms can be described as the core of evaluativity. They were divided into groups, which revealed the cognitive stereotypes in the linguistic cultures under analysis. The thematic classification made it possible to analyze the productivity of meronyms in CPU and compare the basic images of the English, German, Russian, and Urdu national linguistic cultures. The national specificity of comparative phraseology appeared to depend on the national-specific vocabulary, i.e. lexemes with special linguacultural significance or national realia. As a part of a phraseological comparative unit, realia lose part of their meaning, while maintaining the national aspect. Most CPU demonstrated negative evaluativity, which confirmed the universal semantic asymmetry of phraseology.N. V. BhattiE. V. KovshE. Yu. KharitonovaKemerovo State Universityarticlecomparative phraseological unitsemantic groupmeronymuniversal linguacultural symbolnational linguistic culturesemantic categoryassociative imageHistory of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet RepublicsDK1-4735PsychologyBF1-990ENRUВестник Кемеровского государственного университета, Vol 23, Iss 3, Pp 760-772 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	comparative phraseological unit semantic group meronym universal linguacultural symbol national linguistic culture semantic category associative image History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics DK1-4735 Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	comparative phraseological unit semantic group meronym universal linguacultural symbol national linguistic culture semantic category associative image History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics DK1-4735 Psychology BF1-990 N. V. Bhatti E. V. Kovsh E. Yu. Kharitonova Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)
description	The present research featured the semantics of expressivity of comparative phraseological units (CPU) in English, German, Russian, and Urdu. The authors studied the lexical components of comparative constructions in order to define the universal and the national in these languages. Comparative idioms can be described as the core of evaluativity. They were divided into groups, which revealed the cognitive stereotypes in the linguistic cultures under analysis. The thematic classification made it possible to analyze the productivity of meronyms in CPU and compare the basic images of the English, German, Russian, and Urdu national linguistic cultures. The national specificity of comparative phraseology appeared to depend on the national-specific vocabulary, i.e. lexemes with special linguacultural significance or national realia. As a part of a phraseological comparative unit, realia lose part of their meaning, while maintaining the national aspect. Most CPU demonstrated negative evaluativity, which confirmed the universal semantic asymmetry of phraseology.
format	article
author	N. V. Bhatti E. V. Kovsh E. Yu. Kharitonova
author_facet	N. V. Bhatti E. V. Kovsh E. Yu. Kharitonova
author_sort	N. V. Bhatti
title	Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)
title_short	Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)
title_full	Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)
title_fullStr	Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)
title_full_unstemmed	Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)
title_sort	culturological characteristics of phraseological comparative units in indo-european languages (english, german, russian, and urdu)
publisher	Kemerovo State University
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ba8f370e129e49828ff9b6ca709c6681
work_keys_str_mv	AT nvbhatti culturologicalcharacteristicsofphraseologicalcomparativeunitsinindoeuropeanlanguagesenglishgermanrussianandurdu AT evkovsh culturologicalcharacteristicsofphraseologicalcomparativeunitsinindoeuropeanlanguagesenglishgermanrussianandurdu AT eyukharitonova culturologicalcharacteristicsofphraseologicalcomparativeunitsinindoeuropeanlanguagesenglishgermanrussianandurdu
_version_	1718426012795011072

Culturological Characteristics of Phraseological Comparative Units in Indo-European Languages (English, German, Russian, and Urdu)

Ejemplares similares