The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI

Abstract The current study made participants sit to complete both the implicit sequence learning and the inclusion/exclusion tasks with the latter just after the former, and used eyes-closed and eyes-open resting states fMRI and their difference to test the ecological validity of the mutually exclus...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jianxin Zhang, Xiangpeng Wang, Didi Zhang, Antao Chen, Dianzhi Liu
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/babe5e08ec0d42e0be57e48e458c7216
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:babe5e08ec0d42e0be57e48e458c7216
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:babe5e08ec0d42e0be57e48e458c72162021-12-02T18:18:43ZThe ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI10.1038/s41598-021-92616-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/babe5e08ec0d42e0be57e48e458c72162021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92616-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The current study made participants sit to complete both the implicit sequence learning and the inclusion/exclusion tasks with the latter just after the former, and used eyes-closed and eyes-open resting states fMRI and their difference to test the ecological validity of the mutually exclusive theory (MET) in implicit-sequence-learning consciousness. (1) The behavioral and neuroimaging data did not support the process dissociation procedure, but did fit well with the MET. The correct inclusion-task response and the incorrect exclusion-task response were mutually exclusive with each other. The relevant brain areas of the two responses were either different or opposite in the eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states and their difference. (2) ALFFs in eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states and their difference were diversely related to the four MET knowledge in implicit sequence learning. The relevant brain areas of the four MET knowledge in the eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-state were the cerebral cortex responsible for vision, attention, cognitive control and consciousness, which could be called the upper consciousness network, and there were more relevant brain areas in the eyes-open resting-state than in the eye-closed resting-state.The relevant brain areas in ALFFs-difference were the subcortical nucleus responsible for sensory awareness, memory and implicit sequence learning, which could be called the lower consciousness network. ALFFs-difference could predict the four MET knowledge as a quantitative transition sensitivity index from internal feeling to external stimulus. (3) The relevant resting-state brain areas of the four MET knowledge were either different (for most brain areas, if some brain areas were related to one MET knowledge, they were not related to the other three MET knowledge) or opposite (for some brain areas, if some brain areas were positively related to one MET knowledge, they were negatively related to other MET knowledge). With the participants' control/consciousness level increasing from no-acquisition to controllable knowledge step by step, the positively relevant resting-state brain areas of the four MET knowledge changed from some consciousness network and the motor network, to some consciousness network and the implicit learning network, and then to some consciousness network; and the negatively relevant resting-state brain areas of the four MET knowledge changed from some consciousness network and visual perception network, to some consciousness network, then to some consciousness network and the motor network, and then to some consciousness network, the implicit learning network, and the motor network. In conclusion, the current study found the ecological validity of the MET was good in sitting posture and eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states, ALFFs in eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states and their difference could predict the four MET knowledge diversely, and the four MET knowledge had different or opposite relevant resting-state brain areas.Jianxin ZhangXiangpeng WangDidi ZhangAntao ChenDianzhi LiuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Jianxin Zhang Xiangpeng Wang Didi Zhang Antao Chen Dianzhi Liu The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI
description	Abstract The current study made participants sit to complete both the implicit sequence learning and the inclusion/exclusion tasks with the latter just after the former, and used eyes-closed and eyes-open resting states fMRI and their difference to test the ecological validity of the mutually exclusive theory (MET) in implicit-sequence-learning consciousness. (1) The behavioral and neuroimaging data did not support the process dissociation procedure, but did fit well with the MET. The correct inclusion-task response and the incorrect exclusion-task response were mutually exclusive with each other. The relevant brain areas of the two responses were either different or opposite in the eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states and their difference. (2) ALFFs in eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states and their difference were diversely related to the four MET knowledge in implicit sequence learning. The relevant brain areas of the four MET knowledge in the eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-state were the cerebral cortex responsible for vision, attention, cognitive control and consciousness, which could be called the upper consciousness network, and there were more relevant brain areas in the eyes-open resting-state than in the eye-closed resting-state.The relevant brain areas in ALFFs-difference were the subcortical nucleus responsible for sensory awareness, memory and implicit sequence learning, which could be called the lower consciousness network. ALFFs-difference could predict the four MET knowledge as a quantitative transition sensitivity index from internal feeling to external stimulus. (3) The relevant resting-state brain areas of the four MET knowledge were either different (for most brain areas, if some brain areas were related to one MET knowledge, they were not related to the other three MET knowledge) or opposite (for some brain areas, if some brain areas were positively related to one MET knowledge, they were negatively related to other MET knowledge). With the participants' control/consciousness level increasing from no-acquisition to controllable knowledge step by step, the positively relevant resting-state brain areas of the four MET knowledge changed from some consciousness network and the motor network, to some consciousness network and the implicit learning network, and then to some consciousness network; and the negatively relevant resting-state brain areas of the four MET knowledge changed from some consciousness network and visual perception network, to some consciousness network, then to some consciousness network and the motor network, and then to some consciousness network, the implicit learning network, and the motor network. In conclusion, the current study found the ecological validity of the MET was good in sitting posture and eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states, ALFFs in eyes-closed and eyes-open resting-states and their difference could predict the four MET knowledge diversely, and the four MET knowledge had different or opposite relevant resting-state brain areas.
format	article
author	Jianxin Zhang Xiangpeng Wang Didi Zhang Antao Chen Dianzhi Liu
author_facet	Jianxin Zhang Xiangpeng Wang Didi Zhang Antao Chen Dianzhi Liu
author_sort	Jianxin Zhang
title	The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI
title_short	The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI
title_full	The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI
title_fullStr	The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI
title_full_unstemmed	The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI
title_sort	ecological validity of met was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fmri
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/babe5e08ec0d42e0be57e48e458c7216
work_keys_str_mv	AT jianxinzhang theecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT xiangpengwang theecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT didizhang theecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT antaochen theecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT dianzhiliu theecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT jianxinzhang ecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT xiangpengwang ecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT didizhang ecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT antaochen ecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri AT dianzhiliu ecologicalvalidityofmetwasfavourableinsittingimplicitsequencelearningconsciousnessbyeyesclosedandeyesopenrestingstatesfmri
_version_	1718378239954518016

The ecological validity of MET was favourable in sitting implicit sequence learning consciousness by eyes closed and eyes open resting states fMRI

Ejemplares similares