Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos
The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. This purpose rises from our will to contribute to the debate about the scientificity of such topics. After providing an overview of the most authoritative scholars who have broached the issue, an attempt will...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b92021-12-05T14:11:00ZChance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos2543-804210.1515/openps-2021-0003https://doaj.org/article/bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b92020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2021-0003https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8042The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. This purpose rises from our will to contribute to the debate about the scientificity of such topics. After providing an overview of the most authoritative scholars who have broached the issue, an attempt will be made to propose an alternative answer through scientific computational research, that is neural networks.Boiago LunaQuaratino Giovanni RaimondoCarli Luiss GuidoDe Gruyterarticlechanceboudonneural networksPolitical scienceJENOpen Political Science, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 27-30 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
chance boudon neural networks Political science J |
spellingShingle |
chance boudon neural networks Political science J Boiago Luna Quaratino Giovanni Raimondo Carli Luiss Guido Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos |
description |
The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. This purpose rises from our will to contribute to the debate about the scientificity of such topics. After providing an overview of the most authoritative scholars who have broached the issue, an attempt will be made to propose an alternative answer through scientific computational research, that is neural networks. |
format |
article |
author |
Boiago Luna Quaratino Giovanni Raimondo Carli Luiss Guido |
author_facet |
Boiago Luna Quaratino Giovanni Raimondo Carli Luiss Guido |
author_sort |
Boiago Luna |
title |
Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos |
title_short |
Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos |
title_full |
Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos |
title_fullStr |
Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos |
title_sort |
chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. an open research between thesmos and nomos |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT boiagoluna chancecausalityandnecessityinsocialsciencesmethodologyanopenresearchbetweenthesmosandnomos AT quaratinogiovanniraimondo chancecausalityandnecessityinsocialsciencesmethodologyanopenresearchbetweenthesmosandnomos AT carliluissguido chancecausalityandnecessityinsocialsciencesmethodologyanopenresearchbetweenthesmosandnomos |
_version_ |
1718371497272147968 |