Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos

The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. This purpose rises from our will to contribute to the debate about the scientificity of such topics. After providing an overview of the most authoritative scholars who have broached the issue, an attempt will...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boiago Luna, Quaratino Giovanni Raimondo, Carli Luiss Guido
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: De Gruyter 2020
Materias:
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b92021-12-05T14:11:00ZChance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos2543-804210.1515/openps-2021-0003https://doaj.org/article/bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b92020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2021-0003https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8042The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. This purpose rises from our will to contribute to the debate about the scientificity of such topics. After providing an overview of the most authoritative scholars who have broached the issue, an attempt will be made to propose an alternative answer through scientific computational research, that is neural networks.Boiago LunaQuaratino Giovanni RaimondoCarli Luiss GuidoDe Gruyterarticlechanceboudonneural networksPolitical scienceJENOpen Political Science, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 27-30 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic chance
boudon
neural networks
Political science
J
spellingShingle chance
boudon
neural networks
Political science
J
Boiago Luna
Quaratino Giovanni Raimondo
Carli Luiss Guido
Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos
description The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. This purpose rises from our will to contribute to the debate about the scientificity of such topics. After providing an overview of the most authoritative scholars who have broached the issue, an attempt will be made to propose an alternative answer through scientific computational research, that is neural networks.
format article
author Boiago Luna
Quaratino Giovanni Raimondo
Carli Luiss Guido
author_facet Boiago Luna
Quaratino Giovanni Raimondo
Carli Luiss Guido
author_sort Boiago Luna
title Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos
title_short Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos
title_full Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos
title_fullStr Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos
title_full_unstemmed Chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. An open research between thesmos and nomos
title_sort chance, causality and necessity in social sciences methodology. an open research between thesmos and nomos
publisher De Gruyter
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/bad4b812555546ccaf427d5fc75a67b9
work_keys_str_mv AT boiagoluna chancecausalityandnecessityinsocialsciencesmethodologyanopenresearchbetweenthesmosandnomos
AT quaratinogiovanniraimondo chancecausalityandnecessityinsocialsciencesmethodologyanopenresearchbetweenthesmosandnomos
AT carliluissguido chancecausalityandnecessityinsocialsciencesmethodologyanopenresearchbetweenthesmosandnomos
_version_ 1718371497272147968