Ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific

Ecosystem services (ES) are heralded as an approach that communicates across disciplines and between researchers and resource managers, encouraging more environmentally sustainable human behavior. However, most studies presuppose that "values" are ontologically distinct from "ecosyste...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chelsea E. Hunter, Matthew Lauer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bb0785625d7d46bbb3a991017332e5bd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bb0785625d7d46bbb3a991017332e5bd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bb0785625d7d46bbb3a991017332e5bd2021-11-15T16:40:17ZEcosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific1708-308710.5751/ES-12253-260224https://doaj.org/article/bb0785625d7d46bbb3a991017332e5bd2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss2/art24/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Ecosystem services (ES) are heralded as an approach that communicates across disciplines and between researchers and resource managers, encouraging more environmentally sustainable human behavior. However, most studies presuppose that "values" are ontologically distinct from "ecosystem services" without examining what this framing enables and occludes about human and other-than-human relations. Through a reflexive research approach, we conduct a conventional photo elicitation ES survey among four groups in Moorea, French Polynesia, while also eliciting respondents' evaluations of the survey method, and documenting the method in action as participants interacted with it. Photo elicitation results suggest that fishers valued the subsistence fishery while scientists favored habitats, yet all stakeholders were concerned about the role of economic activities in contributing to environmental degradation. Yet, survey participants had difficulties with interpreting the photos of ecosystem services as intended, an indication that the ES framework commits to a nature-culture dualism and displaces other ways of ordering human and other-than-human relations, particularly those present throughout the Global South. We argue that ecosystem services research is best treated as a situated practice where researcher and research participants jointly produce intended and unintended results and outcomes.Chelsea E. HunterMatthew LauerResilience Alliancearticlecultural ecosystem servicesnature-cultural dualismpacificreflexive methodsBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 2, p 24 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cultural ecosystem services
nature-cultural dualism
pacific
reflexive methods
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle cultural ecosystem services
nature-cultural dualism
pacific
reflexive methods
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Chelsea E. Hunter
Matthew Lauer
Ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific
description Ecosystem services (ES) are heralded as an approach that communicates across disciplines and between researchers and resource managers, encouraging more environmentally sustainable human behavior. However, most studies presuppose that "values" are ontologically distinct from "ecosystem services" without examining what this framing enables and occludes about human and other-than-human relations. Through a reflexive research approach, we conduct a conventional photo elicitation ES survey among four groups in Moorea, French Polynesia, while also eliciting respondents' evaluations of the survey method, and documenting the method in action as participants interacted with it. Photo elicitation results suggest that fishers valued the subsistence fishery while scientists favored habitats, yet all stakeholders were concerned about the role of economic activities in contributing to environmental degradation. Yet, survey participants had difficulties with interpreting the photos of ecosystem services as intended, an indication that the ES framework commits to a nature-culture dualism and displaces other ways of ordering human and other-than-human relations, particularly those present throughout the Global South. We argue that ecosystem services research is best treated as a situated practice where researcher and research participants jointly produce intended and unintended results and outcomes.
format article
author Chelsea E. Hunter
Matthew Lauer
author_facet Chelsea E. Hunter
Matthew Lauer
author_sort Chelsea E. Hunter
title Ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific
title_short Ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific
title_full Ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific
title_fullStr Ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the South Pacific
title_sort ecosystems services research in action: reflexively valuing environments in the south pacific
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bb0785625d7d46bbb3a991017332e5bd
work_keys_str_mv AT chelseaehunter ecosystemsservicesresearchinactionreflexivelyvaluingenvironmentsinthesouthpacific
AT matthewlauer ecosystemsservicesresearchinactionreflexivelyvaluingenvironmentsinthesouthpacific
_version_ 1718426927762505728