MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Websites are important in every organisation and tremendous effort is made to design websites that not only look and feel good, but are usable and of high quality. Nevertheless, one critical task is how to evaluate these websites to ensure that users are satisfied with its quality and usability. Alt...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Solomon Adelowo Adepoju, Ishaq Oyebisi Oyefolahan, Muhammed Bashir Abdullahi, Adamu Alhaji Mohammed
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	UUM Press 2020
Materias:	decision making website usability website evaluation quality Information technology T58.5-58.64
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bb1b04df009f4a9b9ae93bca8bb7f185
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bb1b04df009f4a9b9ae93bca8bb7f185
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bb1b04df009f4a9b9ae93bca8bb7f1852021-11-15T04:09:42ZMULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW10.32890/jict2020.19.3.51675-414X2180-3862https://doaj.org/article/bb1b04df009f4a9b9ae93bca8bb7f1852020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jict/article/view/jict2020.19.3.5https://doaj.org/toc/1675-414Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2180-3862Websites are important in every organisation and tremendous effort is made to design websites that not only look and feel good, but are usable and of high quality. Nevertheless, one critical task is how to evaluate these websites to ensure that users are satisfied with its quality and usability. Although a variety of methods and approaches have been proposed, there is currently an increase in research efforts to model website quality and usability evaluation from the point of view of decision-makers which existing methods do not handle. Thus, this has led to the application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches in the evaluation of websites to handle complexity in decision-making. This paper, therefore, provides a review of the various MCDM methods that have been used in the usability and quality evaluation of websites. The search strategy which was adopted identified a total of 63 published articles in peer-reviewed journals and international conferences between 2005 and 2017. From the research questions formulated for the study, the papers were classified into various MCDM approaches, website genre, number and list of criteria used over the years and the localization of websites based on country. Some of the findings showed that the Analytical Hierarchy Process approach integrated with fuzzy logic has been the most common method over the years. In addition, e-commerce websites make up the most common website genre. Besides, currently most active websites are from Turkey and five is the average number of criteria for the evaluation of website quality and usability. Solomon Adelowo AdepojuIshaq Oyebisi OyefolahanMuhammed Bashir AbdullahiAdamu Alhaji MohammedUUM Pressarticledecision makingwebsiteusabilitywebsite evaluationqualityInformation technologyT58.5-58.64ENJournal of ICT, Vol 19, Iss 3, Pp 399-436 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	decision making website usability website evaluation quality Information technology T58.5-58.64
spellingShingle	decision making website usability website evaluation quality Information technology T58.5-58.64 Solomon Adelowo Adepoju Ishaq Oyebisi Oyefolahan Muhammed Bashir Abdullahi Adamu Alhaji Mohammed MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
description	Websites are important in every organisation and tremendous effort is made to design websites that not only look and feel good, but are usable and of high quality. Nevertheless, one critical task is how to evaluate these websites to ensure that users are satisfied with its quality and usability. Although a variety of methods and approaches have been proposed, there is currently an increase in research efforts to model website quality and usability evaluation from the point of view of decision-makers which existing methods do not handle. Thus, this has led to the application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches in the evaluation of websites to handle complexity in decision-making. This paper, therefore, provides a review of the various MCDM methods that have been used in the usability and quality evaluation of websites. The search strategy which was adopted identified a total of 63 published articles in peer-reviewed journals and international conferences between 2005 and 2017. From the research questions formulated for the study, the papers were classified into various MCDM approaches, website genre, number and list of criteria used over the years and the localization of websites based on country. Some of the findings showed that the Analytical Hierarchy Process approach integrated with fuzzy logic has been the most common method over the years. In addition, e-commerce websites make up the most common website genre. Besides, currently most active websites are from Turkey and five is the average number of criteria for the evaluation of website quality and usability.
format	article
author	Solomon Adelowo Adepoju Ishaq Oyebisi Oyefolahan Muhammed Bashir Abdullahi Adamu Alhaji Mohammed
author_facet	Solomon Adelowo Adepoju Ishaq Oyebisi Oyefolahan Muhammed Bashir Abdullahi Adamu Alhaji Mohammed
author_sort	Solomon Adelowo Adepoju
title	MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_short	MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_full	MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_fullStr	MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed	MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_sort	multi-criteria decision-making based approaches in website quality and usability evaluation: a systematic review
publisher	UUM Press
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/bb1b04df009f4a9b9ae93bca8bb7f185
work_keys_str_mv	AT solomonadelowoadepoju multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedapproachesinwebsitequalityandusabilityevaluationasystematicreview AT ishaqoyebisioyefolahan multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedapproachesinwebsitequalityandusabilityevaluationasystematicreview AT muhammedbashirabdullahi multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedapproachesinwebsitequalityandusabilityevaluationasystematicreview AT adamualhajimohammed multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedapproachesinwebsitequalityandusabilityevaluationasystematicreview
_version_	1718428892833775616

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING BASED APPROACHES IN WEBSITE QUALITY AND USABILITY EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Ejemplares similares