Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images

Abstract Both histologic subtypes and tumor mutation burden (TMB) represent important biomarkers in lung cancer, with implications for patient prognosis and treatment decisions. Typically, TMB is evaluated by comprehensive genomic profiling but this requires use of finite tissue specimens and costly...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Apaar Sadhwani, Huang-Wei Chang, Ali Behrooz, Trissia Brown, Isabelle Auvigne-Flament, Hardik Patel, Robert Findlater, Vanessa Velez, Fraser Tan, Kamilla Tekiela, Ellery Wulczyn, Eunhee S. Yi, Craig H. Mermel, Debra Hanks, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen, Kimary Kulig, Cory Batenchuk, David F. Steiner, Peter Cimermancic
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bb85166704e240079299ad3d736a4fbb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bb85166704e240079299ad3d736a4fbb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bb85166704e240079299ad3d736a4fbb2021-12-02T16:46:35ZComparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images10.1038/s41598-021-95747-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/bb85166704e240079299ad3d736a4fbb2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95747-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Both histologic subtypes and tumor mutation burden (TMB) represent important biomarkers in lung cancer, with implications for patient prognosis and treatment decisions. Typically, TMB is evaluated by comprehensive genomic profiling but this requires use of finite tissue specimens and costly, time-consuming laboratory processes. Histologic subtype classification represents an established component of lung adenocarcinoma histopathology, but can be challenging and is associated with substantial inter-pathologist variability. Here we developed a deep learning system to both classify histologic patterns in lung adenocarcinoma and predict TMB status using de-identified Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained whole slide images. We first trained a convolutional neural network to map histologic features across whole slide images of lung cancer resection specimens. On evaluation using an external data source, this model achieved patch-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78–0.98 across nine histologic features. We then integrated the output of this model with clinico-demographic data to develop an interpretable model for TMB classification. The resulting end-to-end system was evaluated on 172 held out cases from TCGA, achieving an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.63–0.80). The benefit of using histologic features in predicting TMB is highlighted by the significant improvement this approach offers over using the clinical features alone (AUC of 0.63 [95% CI 0.53–0.72], p = 0.002). Furthermore, we found that our histologic subtype-based approach achieved performance similar to that of a weakly supervised approach (AUC of 0.72 [95% CI 0.64–0.80]). Together these results underscore that incorporating histologic patterns in biomarker prediction for lung cancer provides informative signals, and that interpretable approaches utilizing these patterns perform comparably with less interpretable, weakly supervised approaches.Apaar SadhwaniHuang-Wei ChangAli BehroozTrissia BrownIsabelle Auvigne-FlamentHardik PatelRobert FindlaterVanessa VelezFraser TanKamilla TekielaEllery WulczynEunhee S. YiCraig H. MermelDebra HanksPo-Hsuan Cameron ChenKimary KuligCory BatenchukDavid F. SteinerPeter CimermancicNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Apaar Sadhwani
Huang-Wei Chang
Ali Behrooz
Trissia Brown
Isabelle Auvigne-Flament
Hardik Patel
Robert Findlater
Vanessa Velez
Fraser Tan
Kamilla Tekiela
Ellery Wulczyn
Eunhee S. Yi
Craig H. Mermel
Debra Hanks
Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen
Kimary Kulig
Cory Batenchuk
David F. Steiner
Peter Cimermancic
Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images
description Abstract Both histologic subtypes and tumor mutation burden (TMB) represent important biomarkers in lung cancer, with implications for patient prognosis and treatment decisions. Typically, TMB is evaluated by comprehensive genomic profiling but this requires use of finite tissue specimens and costly, time-consuming laboratory processes. Histologic subtype classification represents an established component of lung adenocarcinoma histopathology, but can be challenging and is associated with substantial inter-pathologist variability. Here we developed a deep learning system to both classify histologic patterns in lung adenocarcinoma and predict TMB status using de-identified Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained whole slide images. We first trained a convolutional neural network to map histologic features across whole slide images of lung cancer resection specimens. On evaluation using an external data source, this model achieved patch-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78–0.98 across nine histologic features. We then integrated the output of this model with clinico-demographic data to develop an interpretable model for TMB classification. The resulting end-to-end system was evaluated on 172 held out cases from TCGA, achieving an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.63–0.80). The benefit of using histologic features in predicting TMB is highlighted by the significant improvement this approach offers over using the clinical features alone (AUC of 0.63 [95% CI 0.53–0.72], p = 0.002). Furthermore, we found that our histologic subtype-based approach achieved performance similar to that of a weakly supervised approach (AUC of 0.72 [95% CI 0.64–0.80]). Together these results underscore that incorporating histologic patterns in biomarker prediction for lung cancer provides informative signals, and that interpretable approaches utilizing these patterns perform comparably with less interpretable, weakly supervised approaches.
format article
author Apaar Sadhwani
Huang-Wei Chang
Ali Behrooz
Trissia Brown
Isabelle Auvigne-Flament
Hardik Patel
Robert Findlater
Vanessa Velez
Fraser Tan
Kamilla Tekiela
Ellery Wulczyn
Eunhee S. Yi
Craig H. Mermel
Debra Hanks
Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen
Kimary Kulig
Cory Batenchuk
David F. Steiner
Peter Cimermancic
author_facet Apaar Sadhwani
Huang-Wei Chang
Ali Behrooz
Trissia Brown
Isabelle Auvigne-Flament
Hardik Patel
Robert Findlater
Vanessa Velez
Fraser Tan
Kamilla Tekiela
Ellery Wulczyn
Eunhee S. Yi
Craig H. Mermel
Debra Hanks
Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen
Kimary Kulig
Cory Batenchuk
David F. Steiner
Peter Cimermancic
author_sort Apaar Sadhwani
title Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images
title_short Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images
title_full Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images
title_sort comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to classify tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma using histopathology images
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bb85166704e240079299ad3d736a4fbb
work_keys_str_mv AT apaarsadhwani comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT huangweichang comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT alibehrooz comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT trissiabrown comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT isabelleauvigneflament comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT hardikpatel comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT robertfindlater comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT vanessavelez comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT frasertan comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT kamillatekiela comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT ellerywulczyn comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT eunheesyi comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT craighmermel comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT debrahanks comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT pohsuancameronchen comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT kimarykulig comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT corybatenchuk comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT davidfsteiner comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
AT petercimermancic comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningapproachestoclassifytumormutationburdeninlungadenocarcinomausinghistopathologyimages
_version_ 1718383417642450944