Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)

Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While su...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jennifer Schellinger, Patrick J. Enderle, Kari Roberts, Sam Skrob-Martin, Danielle Rhemer, Sherry A. Southerland
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf75
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf75
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf752021-11-25T17:23:13ZDescribing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)10.3390/educsci111106692227-7102https://doaj.org/article/bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf752021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/11/669https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7102Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students’ reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students’ reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students’ reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines.Jennifer SchellingerPatrick J. EnderleKari RobertsSam Skrob-MartinDanielle RhemerSherry A. SoutherlandMDPI AGarticlescientific reasoningbiological reasoningassessmentthree-tiered assessmentAssessment of Biological ReasoningEducationLENEducation Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 669, p 669 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic scientific reasoning
biological reasoning
assessment
three-tiered assessment
Assessment of Biological Reasoning
Education
L
spellingShingle scientific reasoning
biological reasoning
assessment
three-tiered assessment
Assessment of Biological Reasoning
Education
L
Jennifer Schellinger
Patrick J. Enderle
Kari Roberts
Sam Skrob-Martin
Danielle Rhemer
Sherry A. Southerland
Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
description Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students’ reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students’ reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students’ reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines.
format article
author Jennifer Schellinger
Patrick J. Enderle
Kari Roberts
Sam Skrob-Martin
Danielle Rhemer
Sherry A. Southerland
author_facet Jennifer Schellinger
Patrick J. Enderle
Kari Roberts
Sam Skrob-Martin
Danielle Rhemer
Sherry A. Southerland
author_sort Jennifer Schellinger
title Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
title_short Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
title_full Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
title_fullStr Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
title_full_unstemmed Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
title_sort describing the development of the assessment of biological reasoning (abr)
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf75
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferschellinger describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr
AT patrickjenderle describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr
AT kariroberts describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr
AT samskrobmartin describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr
AT daniellerhemer describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr
AT sherryasoutherland describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr
_version_ 1718412433158045696