Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While su...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf75 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf75 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf752021-11-25T17:23:13ZDescribing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)10.3390/educsci111106692227-7102https://doaj.org/article/bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf752021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/11/669https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7102Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students’ reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students’ reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students’ reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines.Jennifer SchellingerPatrick J. EnderleKari RobertsSam Skrob-MartinDanielle RhemerSherry A. SoutherlandMDPI AGarticlescientific reasoningbiological reasoningassessmentthree-tiered assessmentAssessment of Biological ReasoningEducationLENEducation Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 669, p 669 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
scientific reasoning biological reasoning assessment three-tiered assessment Assessment of Biological Reasoning Education L |
spellingShingle |
scientific reasoning biological reasoning assessment three-tiered assessment Assessment of Biological Reasoning Education L Jennifer Schellinger Patrick J. Enderle Kari Roberts Sam Skrob-Martin Danielle Rhemer Sherry A. Southerland Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) |
description |
Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students’ reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students’ reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students’ reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines. |
format |
article |
author |
Jennifer Schellinger Patrick J. Enderle Kari Roberts Sam Skrob-Martin Danielle Rhemer Sherry A. Southerland |
author_facet |
Jennifer Schellinger Patrick J. Enderle Kari Roberts Sam Skrob-Martin Danielle Rhemer Sherry A. Southerland |
author_sort |
Jennifer Schellinger |
title |
Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) |
title_short |
Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) |
title_full |
Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) |
title_fullStr |
Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) |
title_sort |
describing the development of the assessment of biological reasoning (abr) |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/bb98ed01edf24a4abdee3ad81a5fdf75 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jenniferschellinger describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr AT patrickjenderle describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr AT kariroberts describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr AT samskrobmartin describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr AT daniellerhemer describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr AT sherryasoutherland describingthedevelopmentoftheassessmentofbiologicalreasoningabr |
_version_ |
1718412433158045696 |