Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature

Objective: To assess the characteristics and quality of cost utility analyses (CUA) related to otolaryngology within the CEA registry and to summarize their collective results. Methods: All cost-utility analyses published between 1976 and 2011 contained in the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry (C...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Krupa R. Patel, David J. Phillips, Jason M. Leibowitz, Theresa Scognamiglio, Victoria E. Banuchi, William I. Kuhel, David I. Kutler, Marc A. Cohen
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2016
Materias:	Otorhinolaryngology RF1-547 Surgery RD1-811
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bc0287b020794ced93487f5c87b5d34c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bc0287b020794ced93487f5c87b5d34c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bc0287b020794ced93487f5c87b5d34c2021-12-02T14:39:13ZValue within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature2095-881110.1016/j.wjorl.2016.01.001https://doaj.org/article/bc0287b020794ced93487f5c87b5d34c2016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881115300263https://doaj.org/toc/2095-8811Objective: To assess the characteristics and quality of cost utility analyses (CUA) related to otolaryngology within the CEA registry and to summarize their collective results. Methods: All cost-utility analyses published between 1976 and 2011 contained in the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry (CEA Registry) were evaluated. Topics that fall within the care of an otolaryngologist were included in the review regardless of the presence of an otolaryngologist author. Potential associations between various study characteristics and CEA registry quality scores were evaluated using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Results: Sixty-one of 2913 (2.1%) total CUA publications screened were related to otolaryngology. Eighteen of 61 (29.5%) publications included an otolaryngologist as an author. Fourteen studies agreed on the cost effectiveness of at least unilateral cochlear implantation and six of seven (85.7%) studies demonstrated the cost effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Forty-six percent (28 of 61) of all manuscripts were published between 2008 and 2011. A more recent publication year was associated with a higher CEA registry quality score while the presence of an otolaryngologist author and journal impact factor had no significant correlation with the quality of the CUA. Conclusion: Based on current evidence in the CEA registry, unilateral cochlear implantation for hearing loss and CPAP for OSA are both cost-effective therapeutic interventions. Although CUAs in otolaryngology have increased in quantity and improved in quality in more recent years, there is a relative lack of CUAs in otolaryngology in comparison to other subspecialties. Keyword: Cost-utility analysisKrupa R. PatelDavid J. PhillipsJason M. LeibowitzTheresa ScognamiglioVictoria E. BanuchiWilliam I. KuhelDavid I. KutlerMarc A. CohenKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.articleOtorhinolaryngologyRF1-547SurgeryRD1-811ENWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 28-37 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Otorhinolaryngology RF1-547 Surgery RD1-811
spellingShingle	Otorhinolaryngology RF1-547 Surgery RD1-811 Krupa R. Patel David J. Phillips Jason M. Leibowitz Theresa Scognamiglio Victoria E. Banuchi William I. Kuhel David I. Kutler Marc A. Cohen Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature
description	Objective: To assess the characteristics and quality of cost utility analyses (CUA) related to otolaryngology within the CEA registry and to summarize their collective results. Methods: All cost-utility analyses published between 1976 and 2011 contained in the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry (CEA Registry) were evaluated. Topics that fall within the care of an otolaryngologist were included in the review regardless of the presence of an otolaryngologist author. Potential associations between various study characteristics and CEA registry quality scores were evaluated using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Results: Sixty-one of 2913 (2.1%) total CUA publications screened were related to otolaryngology. Eighteen of 61 (29.5%) publications included an otolaryngologist as an author. Fourteen studies agreed on the cost effectiveness of at least unilateral cochlear implantation and six of seven (85.7%) studies demonstrated the cost effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Forty-six percent (28 of 61) of all manuscripts were published between 2008 and 2011. A more recent publication year was associated with a higher CEA registry quality score while the presence of an otolaryngologist author and journal impact factor had no significant correlation with the quality of the CUA. Conclusion: Based on current evidence in the CEA registry, unilateral cochlear implantation for hearing loss and CPAP for OSA are both cost-effective therapeutic interventions. Although CUAs in otolaryngology have increased in quantity and improved in quality in more recent years, there is a relative lack of CUAs in otolaryngology in comparison to other subspecialties. Keyword: Cost-utility analysis
format	article
author	Krupa R. Patel David J. Phillips Jason M. Leibowitz Theresa Scognamiglio Victoria E. Banuchi William I. Kuhel David I. Kutler Marc A. Cohen
author_facet	Krupa R. Patel David J. Phillips Jason M. Leibowitz Theresa Scognamiglio Victoria E. Banuchi William I. Kuhel David I. Kutler Marc A. Cohen
author_sort	Krupa R. Patel
title	Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature
title_short	Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature
title_full	Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature
title_fullStr	Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature
title_full_unstemmed	Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature
title_sort	value within otolaryngology: assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature
publisher	KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/bc0287b020794ced93487f5c87b5d34c
work_keys_str_mv	AT kruparpatel valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature AT davidjphillips valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature AT jasonmleibowitz valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature AT theresascognamiglio valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature AT victoriaebanuchi valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature AT williamikuhel valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature AT davidikutler valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature AT marcacohen valuewithinotolaryngologyassessmentofthecostutilityanalysisliterature
_version_	1718390735423668224

Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature

Ejemplares similares