Evaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage
Abstract This paper presents the first plasmid DNA irradiations carried out with Very High Energy Electrons (VHEE) over 100–200 MeV at the CLEAR user facility at CERN to determine the Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) of VHEE. DNA damage yields were measured in dry and aqueous environments to...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/bc24ff85f48f4675af445482c6dc0f31 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:bc24ff85f48f4675af445482c6dc0f31 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:bc24ff85f48f4675af445482c6dc0f312021-12-02T14:11:31ZEvaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage10.1038/s41598-021-82772-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/bc24ff85f48f4675af445482c6dc0f312021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82772-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This paper presents the first plasmid DNA irradiations carried out with Very High Energy Electrons (VHEE) over 100–200 MeV at the CLEAR user facility at CERN to determine the Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) of VHEE. DNA damage yields were measured in dry and aqueous environments to determine that ~ 99% of total DNA breaks were caused by indirect effects, consistent with other published measurements for protons and photons. Double-Strand Break (DSB) yield was used as the biological endpoint for RBE calculation, with values found to be consistent with established radiotherapy modalities. Similarities in physical damage between VHEE and conventional modalities gives confidence that biological effects of VHEE will also be similar—key for clinical implementation. Damage yields were used as a baseline for track structure simulations of VHEE plasmid irradiation using GEANT4-DNA. Current models for DSB yield have shown reasonable agreement with experimental values. The growing interest in FLASH radiotherapy motivated a study into DSB yield variation with dose rate following VHEE irradiation. No significant variations were observed between conventional and FLASH dose rate irradiations, indicating that no FLASH effect is seen under these conditions.K. L. SmallN. T. HenthornD. Angal-KalininA. L. ChadwickE. SantinaA. AitkenheadK. J. KirkbyR. J. SmithM. SurmanJ. JonesW. FaraboliniR. CorsiniD. GambaA. GilardiM. J. MerchantR. M. JonesNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q K. L. Small N. T. Henthorn D. Angal-Kalinin A. L. Chadwick E. Santina A. Aitkenhead K. J. Kirkby R. J. Smith M. Surman J. Jones W. Farabolini R. Corsini D. Gamba A. Gilardi M. J. Merchant R. M. Jones Evaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage |
description |
Abstract This paper presents the first plasmid DNA irradiations carried out with Very High Energy Electrons (VHEE) over 100–200 MeV at the CLEAR user facility at CERN to determine the Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) of VHEE. DNA damage yields were measured in dry and aqueous environments to determine that ~ 99% of total DNA breaks were caused by indirect effects, consistent with other published measurements for protons and photons. Double-Strand Break (DSB) yield was used as the biological endpoint for RBE calculation, with values found to be consistent with established radiotherapy modalities. Similarities in physical damage between VHEE and conventional modalities gives confidence that biological effects of VHEE will also be similar—key for clinical implementation. Damage yields were used as a baseline for track structure simulations of VHEE plasmid irradiation using GEANT4-DNA. Current models for DSB yield have shown reasonable agreement with experimental values. The growing interest in FLASH radiotherapy motivated a study into DSB yield variation with dose rate following VHEE irradiation. No significant variations were observed between conventional and FLASH dose rate irradiations, indicating that no FLASH effect is seen under these conditions. |
format |
article |
author |
K. L. Small N. T. Henthorn D. Angal-Kalinin A. L. Chadwick E. Santina A. Aitkenhead K. J. Kirkby R. J. Smith M. Surman J. Jones W. Farabolini R. Corsini D. Gamba A. Gilardi M. J. Merchant R. M. Jones |
author_facet |
K. L. Small N. T. Henthorn D. Angal-Kalinin A. L. Chadwick E. Santina A. Aitkenhead K. J. Kirkby R. J. Smith M. Surman J. Jones W. Farabolini R. Corsini D. Gamba A. Gilardi M. J. Merchant R. M. Jones |
author_sort |
K. L. Small |
title |
Evaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage |
title_short |
Evaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage |
title_full |
Evaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating very high energy electron RBE from nanodosimetric pBR322 plasmid DNA damage |
title_sort |
evaluating very high energy electron rbe from nanodosimetric pbr322 plasmid dna damage |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/bc24ff85f48f4675af445482c6dc0f31 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT klsmall evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT nthenthorn evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT dangalkalinin evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT alchadwick evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT esantina evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT aaitkenhead evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT kjkirkby evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT rjsmith evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT msurman evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT jjones evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT wfarabolini evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT rcorsini evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT dgamba evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT agilardi evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT mjmerchant evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage AT rmjones evaluatingveryhighenergyelectronrbefromnanodosimetricpbr322plasmiddnadamage |
_version_ |
1718391866102120448 |