A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.

What originally appeared to be only an external cast of an anuran 'mummy' from the Quercy Phosphorites (southwestern France) was described as Rana plicata during the 19th century. Its geographical provenance is only vaguely known; therefore its precise age within the Paleogene was uncertai...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fabien Laloy, Jean-Claude Rage, Susan E Evans, Renaud Boistel, Nicolas Lenoir, Michel Laurin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bc38fe286fdb47a59f71aac85932fb42
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bc38fe286fdb47a59f71aac85932fb42
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bc38fe286fdb47a59f71aac85932fb422021-11-18T08:53:45ZA re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0074874https://doaj.org/article/bc38fe286fdb47a59f71aac85932fb422013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24086389/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203What originally appeared to be only an external cast of an anuran 'mummy' from the Quercy Phosphorites (southwestern France) was described as Rana plicata during the 19th century. Its geographical provenance is only vaguely known; therefore its precise age within the Paleogene was uncertain. The taxon was erected on the basis of the external morphology of the specimen, which includes few diagnostic characters. As a further complication, the name Rana plicata was recently shown to be unavailable at the time of the description, and the name Rana cadurcorum was proposed as a replacement. In order to see whether internal features were fossilized, the fossil was CT scanned. This showed that a large part of the skeleton is preserved. Unexpectedly, the scans revealed that the skull of the mummy is almost identical to that of Thaumastosaurus gezei, another anuran from the late middle or late Eocene of the Quercy Phosphorites. The few observed differences are attributable to intraspecific and ontogenetic variation, and R. cadurcorum is a junior subjective synonym of T. gezei. The mummy is therefore probably from the same time interval as T. gezei. The latter was previously known only by its skull, but the mummy provides important information on the postcranial skeleton. Earlier assessments, based only on the skull, placed Thaumastosaurus close to South American hyloid anurans, but a new phylogenetic analysis including postcranial characters reveals ranoid affinities. This study exemplifies the usefulness of modern imaging technologies that allow non-destructive study of previously inaccessible internal anatomical features.Fabien LaloyJean-Claude RageSusan E EvansRenaud BoistelNicolas LenoirMichel LaurinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e74874 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Fabien Laloy
Jean-Claude Rage
Susan E Evans
Renaud Boistel
Nicolas Lenoir
Michel Laurin
A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.
description What originally appeared to be only an external cast of an anuran 'mummy' from the Quercy Phosphorites (southwestern France) was described as Rana plicata during the 19th century. Its geographical provenance is only vaguely known; therefore its precise age within the Paleogene was uncertain. The taxon was erected on the basis of the external morphology of the specimen, which includes few diagnostic characters. As a further complication, the name Rana plicata was recently shown to be unavailable at the time of the description, and the name Rana cadurcorum was proposed as a replacement. In order to see whether internal features were fossilized, the fossil was CT scanned. This showed that a large part of the skeleton is preserved. Unexpectedly, the scans revealed that the skull of the mummy is almost identical to that of Thaumastosaurus gezei, another anuran from the late middle or late Eocene of the Quercy Phosphorites. The few observed differences are attributable to intraspecific and ontogenetic variation, and R. cadurcorum is a junior subjective synonym of T. gezei. The mummy is therefore probably from the same time interval as T. gezei. The latter was previously known only by its skull, but the mummy provides important information on the postcranial skeleton. Earlier assessments, based only on the skull, placed Thaumastosaurus close to South American hyloid anurans, but a new phylogenetic analysis including postcranial characters reveals ranoid affinities. This study exemplifies the usefulness of modern imaging technologies that allow non-destructive study of previously inaccessible internal anatomical features.
format article
author Fabien Laloy
Jean-Claude Rage
Susan E Evans
Renaud Boistel
Nicolas Lenoir
Michel Laurin
author_facet Fabien Laloy
Jean-Claude Rage
Susan E Evans
Renaud Boistel
Nicolas Lenoir
Michel Laurin
author_sort Fabien Laloy
title A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.
title_short A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.
title_full A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.
title_fullStr A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.
title_full_unstemmed A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified' specimen.
title_sort re-interpretation of the eocene anuran thaumastosaurus based on microct examination of a 'mummified' specimen.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/bc38fe286fdb47a59f71aac85932fb42
work_keys_str_mv AT fabienlaloy areinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT jeanclauderage areinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT susaneevans areinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT renaudboistel areinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT nicolaslenoir areinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT michellaurin areinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT fabienlaloy reinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT jeanclauderage reinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT susaneevans reinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT renaudboistel reinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT nicolaslenoir reinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
AT michellaurin reinterpretationoftheeoceneanuranthaumastosaurusbasedonmicroctexaminationofamummifiedspecimen
_version_ 1718421227398234112