Radiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status

This study reports the role played by the mutation status of Uveal Melanoma (UM) in relation to hepatic metastatic patterns as seen on imaging modalities. Radiological images were obtained from 123 patients treated at the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam or the Rotterdam Eye Hospital. Radiological i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu, Michael C. Y. Tang, Miguel Jansen, Kaspar W. Geul, Roy S. Dwarkasing, Jolanda Vaarwater, Wojtek Drabarek, Robert M. Verdijk, Dion Paridaens, Nicole C. Naus, Erwin Brosens, Annelies de Klein, Emine Kilic
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bc3b3d5de9d44426ab3c53d81f4cab6a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bc3b3d5de9d44426ab3c53d81f4cab6a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bc3b3d5de9d44426ab3c53d81f4cab6a2021-11-11T15:28:12ZRadiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status10.3390/cancers132153162072-6694https://doaj.org/article/bc3b3d5de9d44426ab3c53d81f4cab6a2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/21/5316https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694This study reports the role played by the mutation status of Uveal Melanoma (UM) in relation to hepatic metastatic patterns as seen on imaging modalities. Radiological images were obtained from 123 patients treated at the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam or the Rotterdam Eye Hospital. Radiological images were derived from either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Hepatic metastatic patterns were classified by counting the number of metastases found in the liver. Miliary metastatic pattern (innumerable small metastases in the entire liver) was analyzed separately. Mutation status was determined in 85 patients. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and survival with metastases differed significantly between each of the metastatic patterns (respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.009, <i>p</i> < 0.001), both in favor of patients with less hepatic metastases. The mutation status of the primary tumor was not correlated with any hepatic tumor profiles (<i>p</i> = 0.296). Of the patients who had a solitary metastasis (<i>n</i> = 18), 11 originated from a primary <i>BAP1</i>-mutated tumors and one from a primary <i>SF3B1</i>-mutated tumor. Of the patients who had a miliary metastasis pattern (<i>n</i> = 24), 17 had a primary <i>BAP1</i>-mutated tumor and two had a primary <i>SF3B1</i>-mutated tumor. Chromosome 8p loss was significantly more in patients with more metastases (<i>p</i> = 0.045). Moreover, the primary UMs of patients with miliary metastases harbored more chromosome 8p and 1p loss, compared to patients with single solitary metastasis (<i>p</i> = 0.035 and <i>p</i> = 0.026, respectively). In conclusion, our study shows that there is an inverse correlation of the number of metastasis with the DFS and metastasized survival, indicating separate growth patterns. We also revealed that the number and type of metastases is irrelevant to the prognostic mutation status of the tumor, showing that both <i>BAP1</i>- and <i>SF3B1</i>-mutated UM can result in solitary and miliary metastases, indicating that other processes lay ground to the different metastatic patterns.Serdar YavuzyigitogluMichael C. Y. TangMiguel JansenKaspar W. GeulRoy S. DwarkasingJolanda VaarwaterWojtek DrabarekRobert M. VerdijkDion ParidaensNicole C. NausErwin BrosensAnnelies de KleinEmine KilicMDPI AGarticleuveal melanomachoroidal melanomaeye melanomaBAP1SF3B1liver metastasesNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENCancers, Vol 13, Iss 5316, p 5316 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic uveal melanoma
choroidal melanoma
eye melanoma
BAP1
SF3B1
liver metastases
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle uveal melanoma
choroidal melanoma
eye melanoma
BAP1
SF3B1
liver metastases
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu
Michael C. Y. Tang
Miguel Jansen
Kaspar W. Geul
Roy S. Dwarkasing
Jolanda Vaarwater
Wojtek Drabarek
Robert M. Verdijk
Dion Paridaens
Nicole C. Naus
Erwin Brosens
Annelies de Klein
Emine Kilic
Radiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status
description This study reports the role played by the mutation status of Uveal Melanoma (UM) in relation to hepatic metastatic patterns as seen on imaging modalities. Radiological images were obtained from 123 patients treated at the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam or the Rotterdam Eye Hospital. Radiological images were derived from either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Hepatic metastatic patterns were classified by counting the number of metastases found in the liver. Miliary metastatic pattern (innumerable small metastases in the entire liver) was analyzed separately. Mutation status was determined in 85 patients. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and survival with metastases differed significantly between each of the metastatic patterns (respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.009, <i>p</i> < 0.001), both in favor of patients with less hepatic metastases. The mutation status of the primary tumor was not correlated with any hepatic tumor profiles (<i>p</i> = 0.296). Of the patients who had a solitary metastasis (<i>n</i> = 18), 11 originated from a primary <i>BAP1</i>-mutated tumors and one from a primary <i>SF3B1</i>-mutated tumor. Of the patients who had a miliary metastasis pattern (<i>n</i> = 24), 17 had a primary <i>BAP1</i>-mutated tumor and two had a primary <i>SF3B1</i>-mutated tumor. Chromosome 8p loss was significantly more in patients with more metastases (<i>p</i> = 0.045). Moreover, the primary UMs of patients with miliary metastases harbored more chromosome 8p and 1p loss, compared to patients with single solitary metastasis (<i>p</i> = 0.035 and <i>p</i> = 0.026, respectively). In conclusion, our study shows that there is an inverse correlation of the number of metastasis with the DFS and metastasized survival, indicating separate growth patterns. We also revealed that the number and type of metastases is irrelevant to the prognostic mutation status of the tumor, showing that both <i>BAP1</i>- and <i>SF3B1</i>-mutated UM can result in solitary and miliary metastases, indicating that other processes lay ground to the different metastatic patterns.
format article
author Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu
Michael C. Y. Tang
Miguel Jansen
Kaspar W. Geul
Roy S. Dwarkasing
Jolanda Vaarwater
Wojtek Drabarek
Robert M. Verdijk
Dion Paridaens
Nicole C. Naus
Erwin Brosens
Annelies de Klein
Emine Kilic
author_facet Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu
Michael C. Y. Tang
Miguel Jansen
Kaspar W. Geul
Roy S. Dwarkasing
Jolanda Vaarwater
Wojtek Drabarek
Robert M. Verdijk
Dion Paridaens
Nicole C. Naus
Erwin Brosens
Annelies de Klein
Emine Kilic
author_sort Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu
title Radiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status
title_short Radiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status
title_full Radiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status
title_fullStr Radiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status
title_full_unstemmed Radiological Patterns of Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases in Correlation to Genetic Status
title_sort radiological patterns of uveal melanoma liver metastases in correlation to genetic status
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bc3b3d5de9d44426ab3c53d81f4cab6a
work_keys_str_mv AT serdaryavuzyigitoglu radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT michaelcytang radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT migueljansen radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT kasparwgeul radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT roysdwarkasing radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT jolandavaarwater radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT wojtekdrabarek radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT robertmverdijk radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT dionparidaens radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT nicolecnaus radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT erwinbrosens radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT anneliesdeklein radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
AT eminekilic radiologicalpatternsofuvealmelanomalivermetastasesincorrelationtogeneticstatus
_version_ 1718435265220968448