To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers

Aim of the Study: The aim of the present study was to analyze the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was done on upper left central incisor bracket of MBT 0.022 slot of American...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Perumallapalli Divya, Santosh Reddy Banswada, Shilpa Reddy Kukunuru, Keerthi B Kavya, R Ravi Rathod, Keerthi Chowdary Polavarapu
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	ceramic bracket distal face and base mesial face and base slot width stainless steel bracket stereomicroscope Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bc93998d030f4c90ad024208b8af8f29
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bc93998d030f4c90ad024208b8af8f29
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bc93998d030f4c90ad024208b8af8f292021-11-19T12:15:52ZTo compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_295_21https://doaj.org/article/bc93998d030f4c90ad024208b8af8f292021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1037;epage=1041;aulast=Divyahttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Aim of the Study: The aim of the present study was to analyze the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was done on upper left central incisor bracket of MBT 0.022 slot of American orthodontics (AO), 3M Unitek, Ormco with each 20 of stainless steel and ceramic brackets divided into six groups, and the total sample was 120. The brackets were scanned with stereo microscope of Magnus Company and Image Pro plus analysis software was used to evaluate the mesial face and base, distal face and base. Results: Comparison in between the groups of stainless steel showed that 3M Unitek brackets showed higher slot widths as compared to AO and Ormco which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Comparison in between the groups of ceramic brackets of AO brackets showed higher slot widths as compared to Ormco and 3M Unitek ceramic brackets which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: By this study, there was a difference between stated values and measured values of brackets displaying inaccuracies in dimension. A clear impreciseness about the appliance could be needed during the finishing and detailing stage to avoid loss of torque control due to slot oversize and the divergence of slot walls.Perumallapalli DivyaSantosh Reddy BanswadaShilpa Reddy KukunuruKeerthi B KavyaR Ravi RathodKeerthi Chowdary PolavarapuWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticleceramic bracketdistal face and basemesial face and baseslot widthstainless steel bracketstereomicroscopePharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1037-1041 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	ceramic bracket distal face and base mesial face and base slot width stainless steel bracket stereomicroscope Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	ceramic bracket distal face and base mesial face and base slot width stainless steel bracket stereomicroscope Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Perumallapalli Divya Santosh Reddy Banswada Shilpa Reddy Kukunuru Keerthi B Kavya R Ravi Rathod Keerthi Chowdary Polavarapu To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers
description	Aim of the Study: The aim of the present study was to analyze the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was done on upper left central incisor bracket of MBT 0.022 slot of American orthodontics (AO), 3M Unitek, Ormco with each 20 of stainless steel and ceramic brackets divided into six groups, and the total sample was 120. The brackets were scanned with stereo microscope of Magnus Company and Image Pro plus analysis software was used to evaluate the mesial face and base, distal face and base. Results: Comparison in between the groups of stainless steel showed that 3M Unitek brackets showed higher slot widths as compared to AO and Ormco which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Comparison in between the groups of ceramic brackets of AO brackets showed higher slot widths as compared to Ormco and 3M Unitek ceramic brackets which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: By this study, there was a difference between stated values and measured values of brackets displaying inaccuracies in dimension. A clear impreciseness about the appliance could be needed during the finishing and detailing stage to avoid loss of torque control due to slot oversize and the divergence of slot walls.
format	article
author	Perumallapalli Divya Santosh Reddy Banswada Shilpa Reddy Kukunuru Keerthi B Kavya R Ravi Rathod Keerthi Chowdary Polavarapu
author_facet	Perumallapalli Divya Santosh Reddy Banswada Shilpa Reddy Kukunuru Keerthi B Kavya R Ravi Rathod Keerthi Chowdary Polavarapu
author_sort	Perumallapalli Divya
title	To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers
title_short	To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers
title_full	To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers
title_fullStr	To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers
title_full_unstemmed	To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers
title_sort	to compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/bc93998d030f4c90ad024208b8af8f29
work_keys_str_mv	AT perumallapallidivya tocomparetheaccuracyof0022inchslotofstainlesssteelandceramicorthodonticbracketsmarketedbydifferentmanufacturers AT santoshreddybanswada tocomparetheaccuracyof0022inchslotofstainlesssteelandceramicorthodonticbracketsmarketedbydifferentmanufacturers AT shilpareddykukunuru tocomparetheaccuracyof0022inchslotofstainlesssteelandceramicorthodonticbracketsmarketedbydifferentmanufacturers AT keerthibkavya tocomparetheaccuracyof0022inchslotofstainlesssteelandceramicorthodonticbracketsmarketedbydifferentmanufacturers AT rravirathod tocomparetheaccuracyof0022inchslotofstainlesssteelandceramicorthodonticbracketsmarketedbydifferentmanufacturers AT keerthichowdarypolavarapu tocomparetheaccuracyof0022inchslotofstainlesssteelandceramicorthodonticbracketsmarketedbydifferentmanufacturers
_version_	1718420154851786752

To compare the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers

Ejemplares similares