WRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model

Abstract Urban land surface processes need to be represented to inform future urban climate and building energy projections. Here, the single layer urban canopy model Town Energy Balance (TEB) is coupled to the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to create WRF‐TEB. The coupling method is de...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D. Meyer, R. Schoetter, M. Riechert, A. Verrelle, M. Tewari, J. Dudhia, V. Masson, M. vanReeuwijk, S. Grimmond
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bcae86f496ef41c18fd99af3c2a36249
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bcae86f496ef41c18fd99af3c2a36249
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bcae86f496ef41c18fd99af3c2a362492021-11-15T14:20:26ZWRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model1942-246610.1029/2019MS001961https://doaj.org/article/bcae86f496ef41c18fd99af3c2a362492020-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001961https://doaj.org/toc/1942-2466Abstract Urban land surface processes need to be represented to inform future urban climate and building energy projections. Here, the single layer urban canopy model Town Energy Balance (TEB) is coupled to the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to create WRF‐TEB. The coupling method is described generically, implemented into software, and the code and data are released with a Singularity image to address issues of scientific reproducibility. The coupling is implemented modularly and verified by an integration test. Results show no detectable errors in the coupling. Separately, a meteorological evaluation is undertaken using observations from Toulouse, France. The latter evaluation, during an urban canopy layer heat island episode, shows reasonable ability to estimate turbulent heat flux densities and other meteorological quantities. We conclude that new model couplings should make use of integration tests as meteorological evaluations by themselves are insufficient, given that errors are difficult to attribute because of the interplay between observational errors and multiple parameterization schemes (e.g., radiation, microphysics, and boundary layer).D. MeyerR. SchoetterM. RiechertA. VerrelleM. TewariJ. DudhiaV. MassonM. vanReeuwijkS. GrimmondAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)articleurban meteorologymodel developmentTown Energy BalanceWeather Research and Forecastingbuilding energyscientific reproducibilityPhysical geographyGB3-5030OceanographyGC1-1581ENJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol 12, Iss 8, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic urban meteorology
model development
Town Energy Balance
Weather Research and Forecasting
building energy
scientific reproducibility
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
spellingShingle urban meteorology
model development
Town Energy Balance
Weather Research and Forecasting
building energy
scientific reproducibility
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
D. Meyer
R. Schoetter
M. Riechert
A. Verrelle
M. Tewari
J. Dudhia
V. Masson
M. vanReeuwijk
S. Grimmond
WRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model
description Abstract Urban land surface processes need to be represented to inform future urban climate and building energy projections. Here, the single layer urban canopy model Town Energy Balance (TEB) is coupled to the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to create WRF‐TEB. The coupling method is described generically, implemented into software, and the code and data are released with a Singularity image to address issues of scientific reproducibility. The coupling is implemented modularly and verified by an integration test. Results show no detectable errors in the coupling. Separately, a meteorological evaluation is undertaken using observations from Toulouse, France. The latter evaluation, during an urban canopy layer heat island episode, shows reasonable ability to estimate turbulent heat flux densities and other meteorological quantities. We conclude that new model couplings should make use of integration tests as meteorological evaluations by themselves are insufficient, given that errors are difficult to attribute because of the interplay between observational errors and multiple parameterization schemes (e.g., radiation, microphysics, and boundary layer).
format article
author D. Meyer
R. Schoetter
M. Riechert
A. Verrelle
M. Tewari
J. Dudhia
V. Masson
M. vanReeuwijk
S. Grimmond
author_facet D. Meyer
R. Schoetter
M. Riechert
A. Verrelle
M. Tewari
J. Dudhia
V. Masson
M. vanReeuwijk
S. Grimmond
author_sort D. Meyer
title WRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model
title_short WRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model
title_full WRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model
title_fullStr WRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model
title_full_unstemmed WRF‐TEB: Implementation and Evaluation of the Coupled Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Town Energy Balance (TEB) Model
title_sort wrf‐teb: implementation and evaluation of the coupled weather research and forecasting (wrf) and town energy balance (teb) model
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/bcae86f496ef41c18fd99af3c2a36249
work_keys_str_mv AT dmeyer wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT rschoetter wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT mriechert wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT averrelle wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT mtewari wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT jdudhia wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT vmasson wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT mvanreeuwijk wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
AT sgrimmond wrftebimplementationandevaluationofthecoupledweatherresearchandforecastingwrfandtownenergybalancetebmodel
_version_ 1718428399241789440