The Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation
The paper investigates the myth about the birth of Huicilopochtli, the deity considered by the Spanish conquistadors to be the supreme god of the Aztecs. Aztec myths are even today usually interpreted diachronically, strictly following the sequence of events. Structural analysis, on the other hand,...
Enregistré dans:
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN FR SR |
Publié: |
University of Belgrade
2016
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/bd6724dd6676489bb4b79f4ee30222bf |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:bd6724dd6676489bb4b79f4ee30222bf |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:bd6724dd6676489bb4b79f4ee30222bf2021-12-02T03:18:15ZThe Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/bd6724dd6676489bb4b79f4ee30222bf2016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/7https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801The paper investigates the myth about the birth of Huicilopochtli, the deity considered by the Spanish conquistadors to be the supreme god of the Aztecs. Aztec myths are even today usually interpreted diachronically, strictly following the sequence of events. Structural analysis, on the other hand, in attempting to uncover the message a myth holds, doesn’t deem the sequence of events in the story important, but rather, studies the interrelation of chains of essential units of myth – mythemes. These two kinds of analysis provide two different interpretations of the same myth: while formal analysis gives a cosmological interpretation, structural analysis points to the powerful social contradictions which this myth tries to reconcile.Igor SekeUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 95-111 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR SR |
topic |
Anthropology GN1-890 |
spellingShingle |
Anthropology GN1-890 Igor Seke The Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation |
description |
The paper investigates the myth about the birth of Huicilopochtli, the deity considered by the Spanish conquistadors to be the supreme god of the Aztecs. Aztec myths are even today usually interpreted diachronically, strictly following the sequence of events. Structural analysis, on the other hand, in attempting to uncover the message a myth holds, doesn’t deem the sequence of events in the story important, but rather, studies the interrelation of chains of essential units of myth – mythemes. These two kinds of analysis provide two different interpretations of the same myth: while formal analysis gives a cosmological interpretation, structural analysis points to the powerful social contradictions which this myth tries to reconcile. |
format |
article |
author |
Igor Seke |
author_facet |
Igor Seke |
author_sort |
Igor Seke |
title |
The Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation |
title_short |
The Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation |
title_full |
The Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation |
title_fullStr |
The Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Myth of Huitzilopochtli: Diachronic and Structural Interpretation |
title_sort |
myth of huitzilopochtli: diachronic and structural interpretation |
publisher |
University of Belgrade |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/bd6724dd6676489bb4b79f4ee30222bf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT igorseke themythofhuitzilopochtlidiachronicandstructuralinterpretation AT igorseke mythofhuitzilopochtlidiachronicandstructuralinterpretation |
_version_ |
1718401816921636864 |