Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds

The author discusses the category of paradigm introduced by Thomas Kuhn, systematizes and summarizes the principal claims advanced by home and foreign scholars, reveals the most common trends in understanding paradigms in modern humanities, specifically in linguistics. It is demonstrated that the ca...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	T. V. Dubrovskaya
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2019
Materias:	paradigm linguistics paradigm shift method analysis quantitative qualitative positivism constructivism Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bdc7c82f799e48cd9d9564dc2fcc696a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bdc7c82f799e48cd9d9564dc2fcc696a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bdc7c82f799e48cd9d9564dc2fcc696a2021-12-02T07:58:08ZParadigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-73-87https://doaj.org/article/bdc7c82f799e48cd9d9564dc2fcc696a2019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1297https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The author discusses the category of paradigm introduced by Thomas Kuhn, systematizes and summarizes the principal claims advanced by home and foreign scholars, reveals the most common trends in understanding paradigms in modern humanities, specifically in linguistics. It is demonstrated that the category of paradigm remains popular, but it has undergone some transformations. Considering the review, it can be assumed that the strict understanding of paradigms as incompatible model problems and solutions to them is being replaced by more flexible statements about a greater or lesser importance of a given paradigm over a specific period. Scholars admit the possibility to return to old research problems and tackle them at a higher level, focus on building a universal paradigm that would incorporate various directions of studies and views of language. The author characterizes paradigm arguments in Western research methodology as constructed on the basis of different philosophical approaches to knowledge (admitting or rejecting the possibility to learn the objective truth). It is shown that the methodological compromise has resulted in ‘compatibility principle’, mixed-method research, and a combination of qualitative and quantitative research in humanities, including linguistics.T. V. DubrovskayaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleparadigmlinguisticsparadigm shiftmethodanalysisquantitativequalitativepositivismconstructivismSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 9, Pp 73-87 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	paradigm linguistics paradigm shift method analysis quantitative qualitative positivism constructivism Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	paradigm linguistics paradigm shift method analysis quantitative qualitative positivism constructivism Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 T. V. Dubrovskaya Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds
description	The author discusses the category of paradigm introduced by Thomas Kuhn, systematizes and summarizes the principal claims advanced by home and foreign scholars, reveals the most common trends in understanding paradigms in modern humanities, specifically in linguistics. It is demonstrated that the category of paradigm remains popular, but it has undergone some transformations. Considering the review, it can be assumed that the strict understanding of paradigms as incompatible model problems and solutions to them is being replaced by more flexible statements about a greater or lesser importance of a given paradigm over a specific period. Scholars admit the possibility to return to old research problems and tackle them at a higher level, focus on building a universal paradigm that would incorporate various directions of studies and views of language. The author characterizes paradigm arguments in Western research methodology as constructed on the basis of different philosophical approaches to knowledge (admitting or rejecting the possibility to learn the objective truth). It is shown that the methodological compromise has resulted in ‘compatibility principle’, mixed-method research, and a combination of qualitative and quantitative research in humanities, including linguistics.
format	article
author	T. V. Dubrovskaya
author_facet	T. V. Dubrovskaya
author_sort	T. V. Dubrovskaya
title	Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds
title_short	Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds
title_full	Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds
title_fullStr	Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds
title_full_unstemmed	Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds
title_sort	paradigms in modern russian and foreign linguistics: nature, dynamics, and philosophical grounds
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/bdc7c82f799e48cd9d9564dc2fcc696a
work_keys_str_mv	AT tvdubrovskaya paradigmsinmodernrussianandforeignlinguisticsnaturedynamicsandphilosophicalgrounds
_version_	1718398874639400960

Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds

Ejemplares similares