Consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality

Bioassessment is widely used to measure ecological integrity of natural habitats following anthropogenic disturbances and modifications. Traditionally, bioassessment has been based exclusively on species-environment interactions, i.e. niche processes. However, dispersal processes, and in particular...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thibault Leboucher, Lucas Mignien, Marie Wach, Sébastien Boutry, Aurélien Jamoneau, Sophia I. Passy, Juliette Tison-Rosebery
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bdeb3d6f4b8e4190b9131a39928953c1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bdeb3d6f4b8e4190b9131a39928953c1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bdeb3d6f4b8e4190b9131a39928953c12021-12-01T04:53:43ZConsideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107791https://doaj.org/article/bdeb3d6f4b8e4190b9131a39928953c12021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21004568https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XBioassessment is widely used to measure ecological integrity of natural habitats following anthropogenic disturbances and modifications. Traditionally, bioassessment has been based exclusively on species-environment interactions, i.e. niche processes. However, dispersal processes, and in particular mass effect, could mask the influence of niche processes and lead to erroneous conclusions about ecosystem health. To circumvent this problem, we identified 40 diatom species with distributions driven primarily by mass effect and propose an alternative version of the Biological Diatom Index (IBD2007) excluding these species. We tested the environmental responses of both the original IBD (IBD2007) and the modified IBD (IBDmod) with a benthic diatom dataset from France, collected between 2007 and 2013 and including 9487 samples from 3913 spatially distinct localities. Our results indicate a better relationship between the IBDmod scores and environmental conditions, compared to the IBD2007 scores, leading to a more accurate determination of river ecological status, especially in conditions of moderate nutrient enrichment. This study supports the idea that mass effect may result in biased evaluation of water quality. It is advocated that this process is considered in other diatom-based indices, and by extension, in any biotic index.Thibault LeboucherLucas MignienMarie WachSébastien BoutryAurélien JamoneauSophia I. PassyJuliette Tison-RoseberyElsevierarticleBiological Diatom IndexBio-assessmentCommunity assemblyDiatomsDispersalMass effectEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 127, Iss , Pp 107791- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biological Diatom Index
Bio-assessment
Community assembly
Diatoms
Dispersal
Mass effect
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Biological Diatom Index
Bio-assessment
Community assembly
Diatoms
Dispersal
Mass effect
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Thibault Leboucher
Lucas Mignien
Marie Wach
Sébastien Boutry
Aurélien Jamoneau
Sophia I. Passy
Juliette Tison-Rosebery
Consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality
description Bioassessment is widely used to measure ecological integrity of natural habitats following anthropogenic disturbances and modifications. Traditionally, bioassessment has been based exclusively on species-environment interactions, i.e. niche processes. However, dispersal processes, and in particular mass effect, could mask the influence of niche processes and lead to erroneous conclusions about ecosystem health. To circumvent this problem, we identified 40 diatom species with distributions driven primarily by mass effect and propose an alternative version of the Biological Diatom Index (IBD2007) excluding these species. We tested the environmental responses of both the original IBD (IBD2007) and the modified IBD (IBDmod) with a benthic diatom dataset from France, collected between 2007 and 2013 and including 9487 samples from 3913 spatially distinct localities. Our results indicate a better relationship between the IBDmod scores and environmental conditions, compared to the IBD2007 scores, leading to a more accurate determination of river ecological status, especially in conditions of moderate nutrient enrichment. This study supports the idea that mass effect may result in biased evaluation of water quality. It is advocated that this process is considered in other diatom-based indices, and by extension, in any biotic index.
format article
author Thibault Leboucher
Lucas Mignien
Marie Wach
Sébastien Boutry
Aurélien Jamoneau
Sophia I. Passy
Juliette Tison-Rosebery
author_facet Thibault Leboucher
Lucas Mignien
Marie Wach
Sébastien Boutry
Aurélien Jamoneau
Sophia I. Passy
Juliette Tison-Rosebery
author_sort Thibault Leboucher
title Consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality
title_short Consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality
title_full Consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality
title_fullStr Consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality
title_full_unstemmed Consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality
title_sort consideration of mass effect processes in bioindication allows more accurate bioassessment of water quality
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bdeb3d6f4b8e4190b9131a39928953c1
work_keys_str_mv AT thibaultleboucher considerationofmasseffectprocessesinbioindicationallowsmoreaccuratebioassessmentofwaterquality
AT lucasmignien considerationofmasseffectprocessesinbioindicationallowsmoreaccuratebioassessmentofwaterquality
AT mariewach considerationofmasseffectprocessesinbioindicationallowsmoreaccuratebioassessmentofwaterquality
AT sebastienboutry considerationofmasseffectprocessesinbioindicationallowsmoreaccuratebioassessmentofwaterquality
AT aurelienjamoneau considerationofmasseffectprocessesinbioindicationallowsmoreaccuratebioassessmentofwaterquality
AT sophiaipassy considerationofmasseffectprocessesinbioindicationallowsmoreaccuratebioassessmentofwaterquality
AT juliettetisonrosebery considerationofmasseffectprocessesinbioindicationallowsmoreaccuratebioassessmentofwaterquality
_version_ 1718405686629498880