Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience

Abstract Background Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagem...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nathalie Clavel, Jesseca Paquette, Vincent Dumez, Claudio Del Grande, Djahanchah Philip (Sacha) Ghadiri, Marie‐Pascale Pomey, Louise Normandin
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	clinical care healthcare professionals patient engagement patients scoping review validated tools Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/be1797a183d9435099c721b2398acdff
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:be1797a183d9435099c721b2398acdff
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:be1797a183d9435099c721b2398acdff2021-11-29T13:50:52ZPatient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience1369-76251369-651310.1111/hex.13344https://doaj.org/article/be1797a183d9435099c721b2398acdff2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13344https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625Abstract Background Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care. Objective Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care. Search Strategy A scoping review of recent peer‐reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL‐EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient‐centredness, empowerment, shared decision‐making and partnership in care. Main Results Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision‐making and patient‐centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient‐centredness, empowerment and shared decision‐making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase. Discussion and Conclusion There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time. Patient and Public Contribution This manuscript was prepared with a patient expert who is one of the authors. Vincent Dumez, who is a patient expert and codirector of the Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, has contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.Nathalie ClavelJesseca PaquetteVincent DumezClaudio Del GrandeDjahanchah Philip (Sacha) GhadiriMarie‐Pascale PomeyLouise NormandinWileyarticleclinical carehealthcare professionalspatient engagementpatientsscoping reviewvalidated toolsMedicine (General)R5-920Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENHealth Expectations, Vol 24, Iss 6, Pp 1924-1935 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	clinical care healthcare professionals patient engagement patients scoping review validated tools Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270
spellingShingle	clinical care healthcare professionals patient engagement patients scoping review validated tools Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Nathalie Clavel Jesseca Paquette Vincent Dumez Claudio Del Grande Djahanchah Philip (Sacha) Ghadiri Marie‐Pascale Pomey Louise Normandin Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience
description	Abstract Background Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care. Objective Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care. Search Strategy A scoping review of recent peer‐reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL‐EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient‐centredness, empowerment, shared decision‐making and partnership in care. Main Results Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision‐making and patient‐centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient‐centredness, empowerment and shared decision‐making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase. Discussion and Conclusion There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time. Patient and Public Contribution This manuscript was prepared with a patient expert who is one of the authors. Vincent Dumez, who is a patient expert and codirector of the Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, has contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.
format	article
author	Nathalie Clavel Jesseca Paquette Vincent Dumez Claudio Del Grande Djahanchah Philip (Sacha) Ghadiri Marie‐Pascale Pomey Louise Normandin
author_facet	Nathalie Clavel Jesseca Paquette Vincent Dumez Claudio Del Grande Djahanchah Philip (Sacha) Ghadiri Marie‐Pascale Pomey Louise Normandin
author_sort	Nathalie Clavel
title	Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience
title_short	Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience
title_full	Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience
title_fullStr	Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience
title_full_unstemmed	Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience
title_sort	patient engagement in care: a scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/be1797a183d9435099c721b2398acdff
work_keys_str_mv	AT nathalieclavel patientengagementincareascopingreviewofrecentlyvalidatedtoolsassessingpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalspreferencesandexperience AT jessecapaquette patientengagementincareascopingreviewofrecentlyvalidatedtoolsassessingpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalspreferencesandexperience AT vincentdumez patientengagementincareascopingreviewofrecentlyvalidatedtoolsassessingpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalspreferencesandexperience AT claudiodelgrande patientengagementincareascopingreviewofrecentlyvalidatedtoolsassessingpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalspreferencesandexperience AT djahanchahphilipsachaghadiri patientengagementincareascopingreviewofrecentlyvalidatedtoolsassessingpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalspreferencesandexperience AT mariepascalepomey patientengagementincareascopingreviewofrecentlyvalidatedtoolsassessingpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalspreferencesandexperience AT louisenormandin patientengagementincareascopingreviewofrecentlyvalidatedtoolsassessingpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalspreferencesandexperience
_version_	1718407369861365760

Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience

Ejemplares similares