Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
<i><b>Background</b></i>: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Theref...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/be1c05897c5c4212a6a6388091cae115 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:be1c05897c5c4212a6a6388091cae115 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:be1c05897c5c4212a6a6388091cae1152021-11-11T18:11:50ZBond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies10.3390/ma142166941996-1944https://doaj.org/article/be1c05897c5c4212a6a6388091cae1152021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6694https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944<i><b>Background</b></i>: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and self-adhesive flowable composites (SFCs) on deciduous teeth. <b><i>Methods</i></b>: A comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA checklist was manually and electronically performed by two independent reviewers through the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase, to include in vitro studies comparing GICs and SFCs bond strength values of restorations on primary teeth. In addition, three groups of meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. <b><i>Results</i></b>: Three articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and subjected to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. No statistically significant difference was found between SFC versus GIC; however, both groups significantly differed with conventional flowable composites (CFs). <b><i>Conclusions</i></b>: Despite the absence of significant difference in bond strength values, SFCs may be considered a valid alternative to GICs in the restoration of deciduous teeth, although CFs proved better in vitro performances.Flavia IaculliAlessandro SalucciGianni Di GiorgioValeria LuzziGaetano IerardoAntonella PolimeniMaurizio BossùMDPI AGarticlebond strengthdental restorationsglass ionomer cementsprimary teethself-adhesive flowable compositesTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6694, p 6694 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
bond strength dental restorations glass ionomer cements primary teeth self-adhesive flowable composites Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 |
spellingShingle |
bond strength dental restorations glass ionomer cements primary teeth self-adhesive flowable composites Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 Flavia Iaculli Alessandro Salucci Gianni Di Giorgio Valeria Luzzi Gaetano Ierardo Antonella Polimeni Maurizio Bossù Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies |
description |
<i><b>Background</b></i>: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and self-adhesive flowable composites (SFCs) on deciduous teeth. <b><i>Methods</i></b>: A comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA checklist was manually and electronically performed by two independent reviewers through the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase, to include in vitro studies comparing GICs and SFCs bond strength values of restorations on primary teeth. In addition, three groups of meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. <b><i>Results</i></b>: Three articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and subjected to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. No statistically significant difference was found between SFC versus GIC; however, both groups significantly differed with conventional flowable composites (CFs). <b><i>Conclusions</i></b>: Despite the absence of significant difference in bond strength values, SFCs may be considered a valid alternative to GICs in the restoration of deciduous teeth, although CFs proved better in vitro performances. |
format |
article |
author |
Flavia Iaculli Alessandro Salucci Gianni Di Giorgio Valeria Luzzi Gaetano Ierardo Antonella Polimeni Maurizio Bossù |
author_facet |
Flavia Iaculli Alessandro Salucci Gianni Di Giorgio Valeria Luzzi Gaetano Ierardo Antonella Polimeni Maurizio Bossù |
author_sort |
Flavia Iaculli |
title |
Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies |
title_short |
Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies |
title_full |
Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies |
title_fullStr |
Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies |
title_sort |
bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composites and glass ionomer cements to primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/be1c05897c5c4212a6a6388091cae115 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT flaviaiaculli bondstrengthofselfadhesiveflowablecompositesandglassionomercementstoprimaryteethasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT alessandrosalucci bondstrengthofselfadhesiveflowablecompositesandglassionomercementstoprimaryteethasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT giannidigiorgio bondstrengthofselfadhesiveflowablecompositesandglassionomercementstoprimaryteethasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT valerialuzzi bondstrengthofselfadhesiveflowablecompositesandglassionomercementstoprimaryteethasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT gaetanoierardo bondstrengthofselfadhesiveflowablecompositesandglassionomercementstoprimaryteethasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT antonellapolimeni bondstrengthofselfadhesiveflowablecompositesandglassionomercementstoprimaryteethasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvitrostudies AT mauriziobossu bondstrengthofselfadhesiveflowablecompositesandglassionomercementstoprimaryteethasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinvitrostudies |
_version_ |
1718431908414619648 |