Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.

Uncertainty is a crucial issue for any risk assessment. Consequently, it also poses crucial challenges for risk communications. Many guidebooks advise reporting uncertainties in risk assessments, expecting that the audience will appreciate this disclosure. However, the empirical evidence about the e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peter Wiedemann, Franziska U Boerner, Frederik Freudenstein
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/be2147a8bb0e4dbb9da6eec4a089f6fb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:be2147a8bb0e4dbb9da6eec4a089f6fb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:be2147a8bb0e4dbb9da6eec4a089f6fb2021-12-02T20:15:25ZEffects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253762https://doaj.org/article/be2147a8bb0e4dbb9da6eec4a089f6fb2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253762https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Uncertainty is a crucial issue for any risk assessment. Consequently, it also poses crucial challenges for risk communications. Many guidebooks advise reporting uncertainties in risk assessments, expecting that the audience will appreciate this disclosure. However, the empirical evidence about the effects of uncertainty reporting is sparse and inconclusive. Therefore, based on examples of potential health risks of electromagnetic fields (EMF), three experiments were conducted analysing the effects of communicating uncertainties separately for hazard identification, risk characterisation and risk protection. The setups aimed to explore how reporting and how explaining of uncertainty affects dependent variables such as risk perception, perceived competence of the risk assessors, and trust in risk management. Each of the three experiments used a 2x2 design with a first factor presenting uncertainty descriptions (as used in public controversies on EMF related health effects) or describing a certainty conditions; and a second factor explaining the causes of uncertainties (by pointing at knowledge gaps) or not explaining them. The study results indicate that qualitative uncertainty descriptions regarding hazard identification reduce the confidence in the professional competencies of the assessors. In contrast, a quantitative uncertainty description in risk characterisation-regarding the magnitude of the risk-does not affect any of the dependent variables. Concerning risk protection, trust in exposure limit values is not affected by qualitative uncertainty information. However, the qualitative description of uncertainty regarding the adequacy of protection amplifies fears. Furthermore, explaining this uncertainty results in lower text understandability.Peter WiedemannFranziska U BoernerFrederik FreudensteinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0253762 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Peter Wiedemann
Franziska U Boerner
Frederik Freudenstein
Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
description Uncertainty is a crucial issue for any risk assessment. Consequently, it also poses crucial challenges for risk communications. Many guidebooks advise reporting uncertainties in risk assessments, expecting that the audience will appreciate this disclosure. However, the empirical evidence about the effects of uncertainty reporting is sparse and inconclusive. Therefore, based on examples of potential health risks of electromagnetic fields (EMF), three experiments were conducted analysing the effects of communicating uncertainties separately for hazard identification, risk characterisation and risk protection. The setups aimed to explore how reporting and how explaining of uncertainty affects dependent variables such as risk perception, perceived competence of the risk assessors, and trust in risk management. Each of the three experiments used a 2x2 design with a first factor presenting uncertainty descriptions (as used in public controversies on EMF related health effects) or describing a certainty conditions; and a second factor explaining the causes of uncertainties (by pointing at knowledge gaps) or not explaining them. The study results indicate that qualitative uncertainty descriptions regarding hazard identification reduce the confidence in the professional competencies of the assessors. In contrast, a quantitative uncertainty description in risk characterisation-regarding the magnitude of the risk-does not affect any of the dependent variables. Concerning risk protection, trust in exposure limit values is not affected by qualitative uncertainty information. However, the qualitative description of uncertainty regarding the adequacy of protection amplifies fears. Furthermore, explaining this uncertainty results in lower text understandability.
format article
author Peter Wiedemann
Franziska U Boerner
Frederik Freudenstein
author_facet Peter Wiedemann
Franziska U Boerner
Frederik Freudenstein
author_sort Peter Wiedemann
title Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_short Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_full Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_fullStr Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
title_sort effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/be2147a8bb0e4dbb9da6eec4a089f6fb
work_keys_str_mv AT peterwiedemann effectsofcommunicatinguncertaintydescriptionsinhazardidentificationriskcharacterizationandriskprotection
AT franziskauboerner effectsofcommunicatinguncertaintydescriptionsinhazardidentificationriskcharacterizationandriskprotection
AT frederikfreudenstein effectsofcommunicatinguncertaintydescriptionsinhazardidentificationriskcharacterizationandriskprotection
_version_ 1718374606821130240