Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.

<h4>Background</h4>India has set a goal to eliminate measles and rubella/Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) by 2023. Towards this goal, India conducted nationwide supplementary immunization activity (SIA) with measles-rubella containing vaccine (MRCV) targeting children aged between 9 mon...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devika Shanmugasundaram, Shally Awasthi, Bhagirathi Dwibedi, S Geetha, Manish Jain, Shikha Malik, Bhupeshwari Patel, Himabindu Singh, Shalini Tripathi, Rajlakshmi Viswanathan, Anjoo Agarwal, Rajeswari Bonu, Shuchi Jain, Saubhagya Kumar Jena, J Priyasree, K Pushpalatha, Syed Ali, Debasis Biswas, Amita Jain, Rahul Narang, Sudha Madhuri, Suji George, Ojas Kaduskar, G Kiruthika, R Sabarinathan, Gajanan Sapakal, Nivedita Gupta, Manoj V Murhekar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/be6dcbce204146a9892316d6e71425b0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:be6dcbce204146a9892316d6e71425b0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:be6dcbce204146a9892316d6e71425b02021-11-25T06:33:29ZBurden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.1935-27271935-273510.1371/journal.pntd.0009608https://doaj.org/article/be6dcbce204146a9892316d6e71425b02021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009608https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735<h4>Background</h4>India has set a goal to eliminate measles and rubella/Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) by 2023. Towards this goal, India conducted nationwide supplementary immunization activity (SIA) with measles-rubella containing vaccine (MRCV) targeting children aged between 9 months to <15 years and established a hospital-based sentinel surveillance for CRS. Reliable data about incidence of CRS is necessary to monitor progress towards the elimination goal.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted serosurveys in 2019-20 among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics of 6 hospitals, which were also sentinel sites for CRS surveillance, to estimate the prevalence of IgG antibodies against rubella. We systematically sampled 1800 women attending antenatal clinics and tested their sera for IgG antibodies against rubella. We used rubella seroprevalence data from the current survey and the survey conducted in 2017 among antenatal women from another 6 CRS surveillance sites to construct a catalytic models to estimate the incidence and burden of CRS.<h4>Result</h4>The seroprevalence of rubella antibodies was 82.3% (95% CI: 80.4-84.0). Rubella seropositivity did not differ by age group and educational status. Based on the constant and age-dependent force of infection models, we estimated that the annual incidence of CRS in India was 225.58 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 217.49-232.41) and 65.47 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 41.60-104.16) respectively. This translated to an estimated 14,520 (95% CI: 9,225-23,100) and 50,028 (95% CI: 48,234-51,543) infants with CRS every year based on age-dependent and constant force of infection models respectively.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Our findings indicated that about one fifth of women in the reproductive age group in India were susceptible for rubella. The estimates of CRS incidence will serve as a baseline to monitor the impact of MRCV SIAs, as well progress towards the elimination goal of rubella/CRS.Devika ShanmugasundaramShally AwasthiBhagirathi DwibediS GeethaManish JainShikha MalikBhupeshwari PatelHimabindu SinghShalini TripathiRajlakshmi ViswanathanAnjoo AgarwalRajeswari BonuShuchi JainSaubhagya Kumar JenaJ PriyasreeK PushpalathaSyed AliDebasis BiswasAmita JainRahul NarangSudha MadhuriSuji GeorgeOjas KaduskarG KiruthikaR SabarinathanGajanan SapakalNivedita GuptaManoj V MurhekarPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleArctic medicine. Tropical medicineRC955-962Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 15, Iss 7, p e0009608 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Devika Shanmugasundaram
Shally Awasthi
Bhagirathi Dwibedi
S Geetha
Manish Jain
Shikha Malik
Bhupeshwari Patel
Himabindu Singh
Shalini Tripathi
Rajlakshmi Viswanathan
Anjoo Agarwal
Rajeswari Bonu
Shuchi Jain
Saubhagya Kumar Jena
J Priyasree
K Pushpalatha
Syed Ali
Debasis Biswas
Amita Jain
Rahul Narang
Sudha Madhuri
Suji George
Ojas Kaduskar
G Kiruthika
R Sabarinathan
Gajanan Sapakal
Nivedita Gupta
Manoj V Murhekar
Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.
description <h4>Background</h4>India has set a goal to eliminate measles and rubella/Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) by 2023. Towards this goal, India conducted nationwide supplementary immunization activity (SIA) with measles-rubella containing vaccine (MRCV) targeting children aged between 9 months to <15 years and established a hospital-based sentinel surveillance for CRS. Reliable data about incidence of CRS is necessary to monitor progress towards the elimination goal.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted serosurveys in 2019-20 among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics of 6 hospitals, which were also sentinel sites for CRS surveillance, to estimate the prevalence of IgG antibodies against rubella. We systematically sampled 1800 women attending antenatal clinics and tested their sera for IgG antibodies against rubella. We used rubella seroprevalence data from the current survey and the survey conducted in 2017 among antenatal women from another 6 CRS surveillance sites to construct a catalytic models to estimate the incidence and burden of CRS.<h4>Result</h4>The seroprevalence of rubella antibodies was 82.3% (95% CI: 80.4-84.0). Rubella seropositivity did not differ by age group and educational status. Based on the constant and age-dependent force of infection models, we estimated that the annual incidence of CRS in India was 225.58 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 217.49-232.41) and 65.47 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 41.60-104.16) respectively. This translated to an estimated 14,520 (95% CI: 9,225-23,100) and 50,028 (95% CI: 48,234-51,543) infants with CRS every year based on age-dependent and constant force of infection models respectively.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Our findings indicated that about one fifth of women in the reproductive age group in India were susceptible for rubella. The estimates of CRS incidence will serve as a baseline to monitor the impact of MRCV SIAs, as well progress towards the elimination goal of rubella/CRS.
format article
author Devika Shanmugasundaram
Shally Awasthi
Bhagirathi Dwibedi
S Geetha
Manish Jain
Shikha Malik
Bhupeshwari Patel
Himabindu Singh
Shalini Tripathi
Rajlakshmi Viswanathan
Anjoo Agarwal
Rajeswari Bonu
Shuchi Jain
Saubhagya Kumar Jena
J Priyasree
K Pushpalatha
Syed Ali
Debasis Biswas
Amita Jain
Rahul Narang
Sudha Madhuri
Suji George
Ojas Kaduskar
G Kiruthika
R Sabarinathan
Gajanan Sapakal
Nivedita Gupta
Manoj V Murhekar
author_facet Devika Shanmugasundaram
Shally Awasthi
Bhagirathi Dwibedi
S Geetha
Manish Jain
Shikha Malik
Bhupeshwari Patel
Himabindu Singh
Shalini Tripathi
Rajlakshmi Viswanathan
Anjoo Agarwal
Rajeswari Bonu
Shuchi Jain
Saubhagya Kumar Jena
J Priyasree
K Pushpalatha
Syed Ali
Debasis Biswas
Amita Jain
Rahul Narang
Sudha Madhuri
Suji George
Ojas Kaduskar
G Kiruthika
R Sabarinathan
Gajanan Sapakal
Nivedita Gupta
Manoj V Murhekar
author_sort Devika Shanmugasundaram
title Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.
title_short Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.
title_full Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.
title_fullStr Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.
title_full_unstemmed Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.
title_sort burden of congenital rubella syndrome (crs) in india based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/be6dcbce204146a9892316d6e71425b0
work_keys_str_mv AT devikashanmugasundaram burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT shallyawasthi burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT bhagirathidwibedi burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT sgeetha burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT manishjain burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT shikhamalik burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT bhupeshwaripatel burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT himabindusingh burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT shalinitripathi burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT rajlakshmiviswanathan burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT anjooagarwal burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT rajeswaribonu burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT shuchijain burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT saubhagyakumarjena burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT jpriyasree burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT kpushpalatha burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT syedali burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT debasisbiswas burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT amitajain burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT rahulnarang burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT sudhamadhuri burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT sujigeorge burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT ojaskaduskar burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT gkiruthika burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT rsabarinathan burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT gajanansapakal burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT niveditagupta burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
AT manojvmurhekar burdenofcongenitalrubellasyndromecrsinindiabasedondatafromcrosssectionalserosurveys2017and201920
_version_ 1718413643442290688