Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios

This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission te...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lorenzo Fanari, Eneko Iradier, Iñigo Bilbao, Rufino Cabrera, Jon Montalban, Pablo Angueira
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	IEEE 802.11be PHY layer channel coding techniques factory automation industrial wireless networks Chemical technology TP1-1185
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/be7b8c3fd49e423d85ecddf788a914e0
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:be7b8c3fd49e423d85ecddf788a914e0
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:be7b8c3fd49e423d85ecddf788a914e02021-11-11T19:11:30ZComparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios10.3390/s212172091424-8220https://doaj.org/article/be7b8c3fd49e423d85ecddf788a914e02021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7209https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission techniques to guarantee link reliability. At the same time, retransmissions compromise latency. IEEE 802.11be, the upcoming WLAN standard, is being considered for Factory Automation (FA) communications. 802.11be addresses specifically latency and reliability difficulties, typical in the previous 802.11 standards. This paper evaluates different channel coding techniques potentially applicable in IEEE 802.11be. The methods suggested here are the following: WLAN LDPC, WLAN Convolutional Codes (CC), New Radio (NR) Polar, and Long Term Evolution (LTE)-based Turbo Codes. The tests consider an IEEE 802.11be prototype under the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and industrial channel models. The results suggest that the best performing codes in factory automation cases are the WLAN LDPCs and New Radio Polar Codes.Lorenzo FanariEneko IradierIñigo BilbaoRufino CabreraJon MontalbanPablo AngueiraMDPI AGarticleIEEE 802.11bePHY layerchannel coding techniquesfactory automationindustrial wireless networksChemical technologyTP1-1185ENSensors, Vol 21, Iss 7209, p 7209 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	IEEE 802.11be PHY layer channel coding techniques factory automation industrial wireless networks Chemical technology TP1-1185
spellingShingle	IEEE 802.11be PHY layer channel coding techniques factory automation industrial wireless networks Chemical technology TP1-1185 Lorenzo Fanari Eneko Iradier Iñigo Bilbao Rufino Cabrera Jon Montalban Pablo Angueira Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
description	This paper presents improvements in the physical layer reliability of the IEEE 802.11be standard. Most wireless system proposals do not fulfill the stringent requirements of Factory Automation use cases. The harsh propagation features of industrial environments usually require time retransmission techniques to guarantee link reliability. At the same time, retransmissions compromise latency. IEEE 802.11be, the upcoming WLAN standard, is being considered for Factory Automation (FA) communications. 802.11be addresses specifically latency and reliability difficulties, typical in the previous 802.11 standards. This paper evaluates different channel coding techniques potentially applicable in IEEE 802.11be. The methods suggested here are the following: WLAN LDPC, WLAN Convolutional Codes (CC), New Radio (NR) Polar, and Long Term Evolution (LTE)-based Turbo Codes. The tests consider an IEEE 802.11be prototype under the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and industrial channel models. The results suggest that the best performing codes in factory automation cases are the WLAN LDPCs and New Radio Polar Codes.
format	article
author	Lorenzo Fanari Eneko Iradier Iñigo Bilbao Rufino Cabrera Jon Montalban Pablo Angueira
author_facet	Lorenzo Fanari Eneko Iradier Iñigo Bilbao Rufino Cabrera Jon Montalban Pablo Angueira
author_sort	Lorenzo Fanari
title	Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_short	Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_full	Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_fullStr	Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios
title_sort	comparison between different channel coding techniques for ieee 802.11be within factory automation scenarios
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/be7b8c3fd49e423d85ecddf788a914e0
work_keys_str_mv	AT lorenzofanari comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT enekoiradier comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT inigobilbao comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT rufinocabrera comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT jonmontalban comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios AT pabloangueira comparisonbetweendifferentchannelcodingtechniquesforieee80211bewithinfactoryautomationscenarios
_version_	1718431607460724736

Comparison between Different Channel Coding Techniques for IEEE 802.11be within Factory Automation Scenarios

Ejemplares similares