Use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.

<h4>Background</h4>The human resource gap in veterinary sectors, particularly in low-income countries, imposes limitations on the delivery of animal healthcare in hard-to-reach populations. Lay animal health workers have been deployed in these settings to fill the gap though there are mi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christian Tetteh Duamor, Katie Hampson, Felix Lankester, Maganga Sambo, Katharina Kreppel, Sally Wyke, Sarah Cleaveland
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/be940169ba784de494bdb547db361e37
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:be940169ba784de494bdb547db361e37
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:be940169ba784de494bdb547db361e372021-12-02T20:24:18ZUse of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.1935-27271935-273510.1371/journal.pntd.0009691https://doaj.org/article/be940169ba784de494bdb547db361e372021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009691https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735<h4>Background</h4>The human resource gap in veterinary sectors, particularly in low-income countries, imposes limitations on the delivery of animal healthcare in hard-to-reach populations. Lay animal health workers have been deployed in these settings to fill the gap though there are mixed views about the benefits of doing this and whether they can deliver services safely. We mapped evidence on the nature and extent of roles assigned to lay animal vaccinators, and identified lessons useful for their future deployment.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, we searched seven bibliographic databases for articles published between 1980 and 2021, with the search terms lay OR community-based OR volunteer AND "animal health worker" OR vaccinator*, and applied an a priori exclusion criteria to select studies. From 30 identified studies, lay vaccinators were used by non-government developmental (n = 12, 40%), research (n = 10, 33%) and government (n = 5, 17%) programmes to vaccinate domestic animals. The main reason for using lay vaccinators was to provide access to animal vaccination in the absence of professional veterinarians (n = 12, 40%). Reported positive outcomes of programmes included increased flock and herd sizes and farmer knowledge of best practice (n = 13, 43%); decreased disease transmission, outbreaks and mortality (n = 11, 37%); higher vaccination coverage (10, 33%); non-inferior seroconversion and birth rates among vaccinated herds (n = 3, 10%). The most frequently reported facilitating factor of lay vaccinator programmes was community participation (n = 14, 47%), whilst opposition from professional veterinarians (n = 8, 27%), stakeholders seeking financial gains to detriment of programmes goals (n = 8, 27%) and programming issues (n = 8, 27%) were the most frequently reported barriers. No study reported on cost-effectiveness and we found no record from a low and middle-income country of lay vaccinator programmes being integrated into national veterinary services.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Although the majority of included studies reported more benefits and positive perceptions of lay vaccinator programmes than problems and challenges, regularization will ensure the programmes can be designed and implemented to meet the needs of all stakeholders.Christian Tetteh DuamorKatie HampsonFelix LankesterMaganga SamboKatharina KreppelSally WykeSarah CleavelandPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleArctic medicine. Tropical medicineRC955-962Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 15, Iss 8, p e0009691 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Christian Tetteh Duamor
Katie Hampson
Felix Lankester
Maganga Sambo
Katharina Kreppel
Sally Wyke
Sarah Cleaveland
Use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.
description <h4>Background</h4>The human resource gap in veterinary sectors, particularly in low-income countries, imposes limitations on the delivery of animal healthcare in hard-to-reach populations. Lay animal health workers have been deployed in these settings to fill the gap though there are mixed views about the benefits of doing this and whether they can deliver services safely. We mapped evidence on the nature and extent of roles assigned to lay animal vaccinators, and identified lessons useful for their future deployment.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, we searched seven bibliographic databases for articles published between 1980 and 2021, with the search terms lay OR community-based OR volunteer AND "animal health worker" OR vaccinator*, and applied an a priori exclusion criteria to select studies. From 30 identified studies, lay vaccinators were used by non-government developmental (n = 12, 40%), research (n = 10, 33%) and government (n = 5, 17%) programmes to vaccinate domestic animals. The main reason for using lay vaccinators was to provide access to animal vaccination in the absence of professional veterinarians (n = 12, 40%). Reported positive outcomes of programmes included increased flock and herd sizes and farmer knowledge of best practice (n = 13, 43%); decreased disease transmission, outbreaks and mortality (n = 11, 37%); higher vaccination coverage (10, 33%); non-inferior seroconversion and birth rates among vaccinated herds (n = 3, 10%). The most frequently reported facilitating factor of lay vaccinator programmes was community participation (n = 14, 47%), whilst opposition from professional veterinarians (n = 8, 27%), stakeholders seeking financial gains to detriment of programmes goals (n = 8, 27%) and programming issues (n = 8, 27%) were the most frequently reported barriers. No study reported on cost-effectiveness and we found no record from a low and middle-income country of lay vaccinator programmes being integrated into national veterinary services.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Although the majority of included studies reported more benefits and positive perceptions of lay vaccinator programmes than problems and challenges, regularization will ensure the programmes can be designed and implemented to meet the needs of all stakeholders.
format article
author Christian Tetteh Duamor
Katie Hampson
Felix Lankester
Maganga Sambo
Katharina Kreppel
Sally Wyke
Sarah Cleaveland
author_facet Christian Tetteh Duamor
Katie Hampson
Felix Lankester
Maganga Sambo
Katharina Kreppel
Sally Wyke
Sarah Cleaveland
author_sort Christian Tetteh Duamor
title Use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.
title_short Use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.
title_full Use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.
title_fullStr Use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: A scoping review.
title_sort use of lay vaccinators in animal vaccination programmes: a scoping review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/be940169ba784de494bdb547db361e37
work_keys_str_mv AT christiantettehduamor useoflayvaccinatorsinanimalvaccinationprogrammesascopingreview
AT katiehampson useoflayvaccinatorsinanimalvaccinationprogrammesascopingreview
AT felixlankester useoflayvaccinatorsinanimalvaccinationprogrammesascopingreview
AT magangasambo useoflayvaccinatorsinanimalvaccinationprogrammesascopingreview
AT katharinakreppel useoflayvaccinatorsinanimalvaccinationprogrammesascopingreview
AT sallywyke useoflayvaccinatorsinanimalvaccinationprogrammesascopingreview
AT sarahcleaveland useoflayvaccinatorsinanimalvaccinationprogrammesascopingreview
_version_ 1718374073405276160