Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)

Abstract This method comparison study used radiographs of 20 mice and 20 budgerigars to investigate comparability between computed radiography (CR) and high-resolution screen-film systems and study the effects of reduced radiation doses on image quality of digital radiographs of small patients. Expo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiebke Tebrün, Eberhard Ludewig, Claudia Köhler, Julia Böhme, Michael Pees
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/be98fd7e32de4d71be3ddf887b09a1b5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:be98fd7e32de4d71be3ddf887b09a1b5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:be98fd7e32de4d71be3ddf887b09a1b52021-12-02T15:08:10ZNeedle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)10.1038/s41598-019-46546-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/be98fd7e32de4d71be3ddf887b09a1b52019-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46546-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This method comparison study used radiographs of 20 mice and 20 budgerigars to investigate comparability between computed radiography (CR) and high-resolution screen-film systems and study the effects of reduced radiation doses on image quality of digital radiographs of small patients. Exposure settings used with the mammography screen-film system (SF) were taken as baseline settings. A powder-based storage-phosphor system (CRP) and a needle-based storage-phosphor system (CRN) were used with the same settings (D/100%) and half the detector dose (D/50%). Using a scoring system four reviewers assessed five criteria per species covering soft tissue and bone structures. Results were evaluated for differences between reviewers (interobserver variability), systems and settings (intersystem variability, using visual grading characteristic analysis). Correlations were significant (p ≤ 0.05) for interobserver variability in 86.7% of the cases. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.206 to 0.772. For mice and budgerigars, the CRN system was rated as superior to the SF and CRP system for most criteria, being significant in two cases each. Comparing the SF and CRP system, the conventional method scored higher for all criteria, in one case significantly. For both species and both digital systems, dose reduction to 50% resulted in significantly worse scores for most criteria. In summary, the needle-based storage-phosphor technique proved to be superior compared to the conventional storage-phosphor and mammography screen-film system. Needle-based detector systems are suitable substitutes for high-resolution screen–film systems when performing diagnostic imaging of small patients. Dose reduction to 50% of the corresponding dose needed in high-resolution film-screen systems cannot be recommended.Wiebke TebrünEberhard LudewigClaudia KöhlerJulia BöhmeMichael PeesNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Wiebke Tebrün
Eberhard Ludewig
Claudia Köhler
Julia Böhme
Michael Pees
Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)
description Abstract This method comparison study used radiographs of 20 mice and 20 budgerigars to investigate comparability between computed radiography (CR) and high-resolution screen-film systems and study the effects of reduced radiation doses on image quality of digital radiographs of small patients. Exposure settings used with the mammography screen-film system (SF) were taken as baseline settings. A powder-based storage-phosphor system (CRP) and a needle-based storage-phosphor system (CRN) were used with the same settings (D/100%) and half the detector dose (D/50%). Using a scoring system four reviewers assessed five criteria per species covering soft tissue and bone structures. Results were evaluated for differences between reviewers (interobserver variability), systems and settings (intersystem variability, using visual grading characteristic analysis). Correlations were significant (p ≤ 0.05) for interobserver variability in 86.7% of the cases. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.206 to 0.772. For mice and budgerigars, the CRN system was rated as superior to the SF and CRP system for most criteria, being significant in two cases each. Comparing the SF and CRP system, the conventional method scored higher for all criteria, in one case significantly. For both species and both digital systems, dose reduction to 50% resulted in significantly worse scores for most criteria. In summary, the needle-based storage-phosphor technique proved to be superior compared to the conventional storage-phosphor and mammography screen-film system. Needle-based detector systems are suitable substitutes for high-resolution screen–film systems when performing diagnostic imaging of small patients. Dose reduction to 50% of the corresponding dose needed in high-resolution film-screen systems cannot be recommended.
format article
author Wiebke Tebrün
Eberhard Ludewig
Claudia Köhler
Julia Böhme
Michael Pees
author_facet Wiebke Tebrün
Eberhard Ludewig
Claudia Köhler
Julia Böhme
Michael Pees
author_sort Wiebke Tebrün
title Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)
title_short Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)
title_full Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)
title_fullStr Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)
title_full_unstemmed Needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)
title_sort needle-based storage-phosphor detector radiography is superior to a conventional powder-based storage phosphor detector and a high-resolution screen-film system in small patients (budgerigars and mice)
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/be98fd7e32de4d71be3ddf887b09a1b5
work_keys_str_mv AT wiebketebrun needlebasedstoragephosphordetectorradiographyissuperiortoaconventionalpowderbasedstoragephosphordetectorandahighresolutionscreenfilmsysteminsmallpatientsbudgerigarsandmice
AT eberhardludewig needlebasedstoragephosphordetectorradiographyissuperiortoaconventionalpowderbasedstoragephosphordetectorandahighresolutionscreenfilmsysteminsmallpatientsbudgerigarsandmice
AT claudiakohler needlebasedstoragephosphordetectorradiographyissuperiortoaconventionalpowderbasedstoragephosphordetectorandahighresolutionscreenfilmsysteminsmallpatientsbudgerigarsandmice
AT juliabohme needlebasedstoragephosphordetectorradiographyissuperiortoaconventionalpowderbasedstoragephosphordetectorandahighresolutionscreenfilmsysteminsmallpatientsbudgerigarsandmice
AT michaelpees needlebasedstoragephosphordetectorradiographyissuperiortoaconventionalpowderbasedstoragephosphordetectorandahighresolutionscreenfilmsysteminsmallpatientsbudgerigarsandmice
_version_ 1718388278094200832