Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives

Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abby Bull, Katie Meadmore, Kathryn Fackrell, Amanda Blatch-Jones, Alejandra Recio-Saucedo, Simon Fraser
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Medicine
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/beb3a7064d0b471eba0059bd5ed7722b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:beb3a7064d0b471eba0059bd5ed7722b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:beb3a7064d0b471eba0059bd5ed7722b2021-11-13T00:00:09ZIdentification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives10.1136/bmjopen-2021-0489792044-6055https://doaj.org/article/beb3a7064d0b471eba0059bd5ed7722b2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/9/e048979.fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055Abby BullKatie MeadmoreKathryn FackrellAmanda Blatch-JonesAlejandra Recio-SaucedoSimon FraserBMJ Publishing GrouparticleMedicineRENBMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Abby Bull
Katie Meadmore
Kathryn Fackrell
Amanda Blatch-Jones
Alejandra Recio-Saucedo
Simon Fraser
Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
format article
author Abby Bull
Katie Meadmore
Kathryn Fackrell
Amanda Blatch-Jones
Alejandra Recio-Saucedo
Simon Fraser
author_facet Abby Bull
Katie Meadmore
Kathryn Fackrell
Amanda Blatch-Jones
Alejandra Recio-Saucedo
Simon Fraser
author_sort Abby Bull
title Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
title_short Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
title_full Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
title_fullStr Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
title_sort identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/beb3a7064d0b471eba0059bd5ed7722b
work_keys_str_mv AT abbybull identificationandcomparisonofkeycriteriaoffeedbackoffundingdecisionsmixedmethodsanalysisoffunderandapplicantperspectives
AT katiemeadmore identificationandcomparisonofkeycriteriaoffeedbackoffundingdecisionsmixedmethodsanalysisoffunderandapplicantperspectives
AT kathrynfackrell identificationandcomparisonofkeycriteriaoffeedbackoffundingdecisionsmixedmethodsanalysisoffunderandapplicantperspectives
AT amandablatchjones identificationandcomparisonofkeycriteriaoffeedbackoffundingdecisionsmixedmethodsanalysisoffunderandapplicantperspectives
AT alejandrareciosaucedo identificationandcomparisonofkeycriteriaoffeedbackoffundingdecisionsmixedmethodsanalysisoffunderandapplicantperspectives
AT simonfraser identificationandcomparisonofkeycriteriaoffeedbackoffundingdecisionsmixedmethodsanalysisoffunderandapplicantperspectives
_version_ 1718430339542548480

Ejemplares similares