What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]

Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systemat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Claire Beecher, Elaine Toomey, Beccy Maeso, Caroline Whiting, Derek C. Stewart, Andrew Worrall, Jim Elliott, Maureen Smith, Theresa Tierney, Bronagh Blackwood, Teresa Maguire, Melissa Kampman, Benny Ling, Christopher Gravel, Catherine Gill, Patricia Healy, Catherine Houghton, Andrew Booth, Chantelle Garritty, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Nikita N. Burke, Ciara Keenan, Matthew Westmore, Declan Devane
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	F1000 Research Ltd 2021
Materias:	Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bede78ef48824bd99bff51e746a561f2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bede78ef48824bd99bff51e746a561f2
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bede78ef48824bd99bff51e746a561f22021-11-22T12:41:08ZWhat are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]2515-482610.12688/hrbopenres.13321.2https://doaj.org/article/bede78ef48824bd99bff51e746a561f22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/4-80/v2https://doaj.org/toc/2515-4826Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systematic review process may be simplified or omitted to produce information more efficiently within constraints of time, expertise, funding or any combination thereof. There is an absence of high-quality evidence underpinning some decisions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. We will conduct a modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to determine the top 10 unanswered research questions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews in collaboration with patients, public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders. Methods: An international steering group consisting of key stakeholder perspectives (patients, the public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders) will facilitate broad reach, recruitment and participation across stakeholder groups. An initial online survey will identify stakeholders’ perceptions of research uncertainties about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. Responses will be categorised to generate a long list of questions. The list will be checked against systematic reviews published within the past three years to identify if the question is unanswered. A second online stakeholder survey will rank the long list in order of priority. Finally, a virtual consensus workshop of key stakeholders will agree on the top 10 unanswered questions. Discussion: Research prioritisation is an important means for minimising research waste and ensuring that research resources are targeted towards answering the most important questions. Identifying the top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities will help target research to improve how we plan, do and share rapid reviews and ultimately enhance the use of high-quality synthesised evidence to inform health care policy and practice.Claire BeecherElaine ToomeyBeccy MaesoCaroline WhitingDerek C. StewartAndrew WorrallJim ElliottMaureen SmithTheresa TierneyBronagh BlackwoodTeresa MaguireMelissa KampmanBenny LingChristopher GravelCatherine GillPatricia HealyCatherine HoughtonAndrew BoothChantelle GarrittyJames ThomasAndrea C. TriccoNikita N. BurkeCiara KeenanMatthew WestmoreDeclan DevaneF1000 Research LtdarticleMedicineRENHRB Open Research, Vol 4 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R
spellingShingle	Medicine R Claire Beecher Elaine Toomey Beccy Maeso Caroline Whiting Derek C. Stewart Andrew Worrall Jim Elliott Maureen Smith Theresa Tierney Bronagh Blackwood Teresa Maguire Melissa Kampman Benny Ling Christopher Gravel Catherine Gill Patricia Healy Catherine Houghton Andrew Booth Chantelle Garritty James Thomas Andrea C. Tricco Nikita N. Burke Ciara Keenan Matthew Westmore Declan Devane What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
description	Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systematic review process may be simplified or omitted to produce information more efficiently within constraints of time, expertise, funding or any combination thereof. There is an absence of high-quality evidence underpinning some decisions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. We will conduct a modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to determine the top 10 unanswered research questions about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews in collaboration with patients, public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders. Methods: An international steering group consisting of key stakeholder perspectives (patients, the public, reviewers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and funders) will facilitate broad reach, recruitment and participation across stakeholder groups. An initial online survey will identify stakeholders’ perceptions of research uncertainties about how we plan, do and share rapid reviews. Responses will be categorised to generate a long list of questions. The list will be checked against systematic reviews published within the past three years to identify if the question is unanswered. A second online stakeholder survey will rank the long list in order of priority. Finally, a virtual consensus workshop of key stakeholders will agree on the top 10 unanswered questions. Discussion: Research prioritisation is an important means for minimising research waste and ensuring that research resources are targeted towards answering the most important questions. Identifying the top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities will help target research to improve how we plan, do and share rapid reviews and ultimately enhance the use of high-quality synthesised evidence to inform health care policy and practice.
format	article
author	Claire Beecher Elaine Toomey Beccy Maeso Caroline Whiting Derek C. Stewart Andrew Worrall Jim Elliott Maureen Smith Theresa Tierney Bronagh Blackwood Teresa Maguire Melissa Kampman Benny Ling Christopher Gravel Catherine Gill Patricia Healy Catherine Houghton Andrew Booth Chantelle Garritty James Thomas Andrea C. Tricco Nikita N. Burke Ciara Keenan Matthew Westmore Declan Devane
author_facet	Claire Beecher Elaine Toomey Beccy Maeso Caroline Whiting Derek C. Stewart Andrew Worrall Jim Elliott Maureen Smith Theresa Tierney Bronagh Blackwood Teresa Maguire Melissa Kampman Benny Ling Christopher Gravel Catherine Gill Patricia Healy Catherine Houghton Andrew Booth Chantelle Garritty James Thomas Andrea C. Tricco Nikita N. Burke Ciara Keenan Matthew Westmore Declan Devane
author_sort	Claire Beecher
title	What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
title_short	What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
title_full	What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
title_fullStr	What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
title_full_unstemmed	What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
title_sort	what are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? a james lind alliance research methodology priority setting partnership: the priority iii study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
publisher	F1000 Research Ltd
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/bede78ef48824bd99bff51e746a561f2
work_keys_str_mv	AT clairebeecher whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT elainetoomey whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT beccymaeso whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT carolinewhiting whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT derekcstewart whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT andrewworrall whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT jimelliott whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT maureensmith whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT theresatierney whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT bronaghblackwood whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT teresamaguire whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT melissakampman whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT bennyling whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT christophergravel whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT catherinegill whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT patriciahealy whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT catherinehoughton whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT andrewbooth whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT chantellegarritty whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT jamesthomas whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT andreactricco whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT nikitanburke whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT ciarakeenan whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT matthewwestmore whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations AT declandevane whatarethemostimportantunansweredresearchquestionsonrapidreviewmethodologyajameslindallianceresearchmethodologyprioritysettingpartnershipthepriorityiiistudyprotocolversion2peerreview1approved3approvedwithreservations
_version_	1718417636582227968

What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]

Ejemplares similares