What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systemat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Claire Beecher, Elaine Toomey, Beccy Maeso, Caroline Whiting, Derek C. Stewart, Andrew Worrall, Jim Elliott, Maureen Smith, Theresa Tierney, Bronagh Blackwood, Teresa Maguire, Melissa Kampman, Benny Ling, Christopher Gravel, Catherine Gill, Patricia Healy, Catherine Houghton, Andrew Booth, Chantelle Garritty, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Nikita N. Burke, Ciara Keenan, Matthew Westmore, Declan Devane |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/bede78ef48824bd99bff51e746a561f2 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
SETTING HEALTH PRIORITIES IN RESEARCH: AN AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE
by: Wasunna,Angela Amondi
Published: (2004) -
Priorities for people living with dementia: education, counseling, research
by: Kerstin Stieber Roger
Published: (2008) -
Global priorities for climate change and mental health research
by: Fiona Charlson, et al.
Published: (2022) -
A Survey of Researchers’ Needs and Priorities for Data Sharing
by: Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Strategic Priorities of Municipal Development Based on Identifying the Interests of Stakeholders: Methodological Approaches and Practical Implementation
by: S. V. Kuznetsov, et al.
Published: (2021)