What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]

Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systemat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Claire Beecher, Elaine Toomey, Beccy Maeso, Caroline Whiting, Derek C. Stewart, Andrew Worrall, Jim Elliott, Maureen Smith, Theresa Tierney, Bronagh Blackwood, Teresa Maguire, Melissa Kampman, Benny Ling, Christopher Gravel, Catherine Gill, Patricia Healy, Catherine Houghton, Andrew Booth, Chantelle Garritty, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Nikita N. Burke, Ciara Keenan, Matthew Westmore, Declan Devane
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	F1000 Research Ltd 2021
Materias:	Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bede78ef48824bd99bff51e746a561f2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Sea el primero en dejar un comentario!

What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]

Ejemplares similares