A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR

The Japanese auxilary construction –te i-ru and Turkish –(I)yor reflect the category of aspect – a gramatical category seen in conjugations. The current study attempts to compare the Japanese aspect marker –te i-ru and its counterpart in Turkish –(I)yor. This article focuses on the distinctions betw...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Aytemis DEPCİ
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2019
Materias:	aspect, verb categories, –te i ru, –(i)yor Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bf22fe90417b475cae3e23e7d0abb143
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bf22fe90417b475cae3e23e7d0abb143
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bf22fe90417b475cae3e23e7d0abb1432021-11-24T09:21:04ZA CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR2148-416310.9761/JASSS784https://doaj.org/article/bf22fe90417b475cae3e23e7d0abb1432019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=386282674_10Depci%20Aytemis_S-159-189.pdf&key=26633https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163The Japanese auxilary construction –te i-ru and Turkish –(I)yor reflect the category of aspect – a gramatical category seen in conjugations. The current study attempts to compare the Japanese aspect marker –te i-ru and its counterpart in Turkish –(I)yor. This article focuses on the distinctions between these two morphemes as well as the similarities by taking into consideration of their semantic features. Various lexical verb categories have been adapted including verb categories of Vendler’s, Mourelatos’, Kindaichi’s and Johanson’s. These categories were compared with each other to eliminate the lacking parts. Examining these four categories, it is aimed to show that with which verb categories both –te i-ru and –(I)yor morhemes are acceptable and denote the same aspectual meaning whereas with some other verb groups they behave differently. Considering to discuss the different senses of –tei-ru and –(I)yor will shed much light on some other interesting points, different semantic features have been analyzed to determine the different meanings of –te i-ru and –(I)yor morphemes. This study proposes both –te i-ru and –(I)yor forms denote ‘progressive’ and ‘habitual’ senses in common, despite the fact that various meanings are also available by these forms. An imperfective marker -te i-ru covers the meaning of progressive, resultative, perfect or habitualness while –(I)yor refers to progressive meaning and habitualness. The progressive perfect meaning can be applied to–(I)yor, as long as durativity is concerned (but not as long as termination is concerned). Other than these meanings, –(I)yor also covers the meaning of futurate, presumptive, historical present (HP), ability and imperative which -te i-ru does not denote.Aytemis DEPCİFırat Universityarticleaspect, verb categories, –te iru, –(i)yorSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 6, Iss 18, Pp 159-189 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	aspect, verb categories, –te i ru, –(i)yor Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	aspect, verb categories, –te i ru, –(i)yor Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Aytemis DEPCİ A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR
description	The Japanese auxilary construction –te i-ru and Turkish –(I)yor reflect the category of aspect – a gramatical category seen in conjugations. The current study attempts to compare the Japanese aspect marker –te i-ru and its counterpart in Turkish –(I)yor. This article focuses on the distinctions between these two morphemes as well as the similarities by taking into consideration of their semantic features. Various lexical verb categories have been adapted including verb categories of Vendler’s, Mourelatos’, Kindaichi’s and Johanson’s. These categories were compared with each other to eliminate the lacking parts. Examining these four categories, it is aimed to show that with which verb categories both –te i-ru and –(I)yor morhemes are acceptable and denote the same aspectual meaning whereas with some other verb groups they behave differently. Considering to discuss the different senses of –tei-ru and –(I)yor will shed much light on some other interesting points, different semantic features have been analyzed to determine the different meanings of –te i-ru and –(I)yor morphemes. This study proposes both –te i-ru and –(I)yor forms denote ‘progressive’ and ‘habitual’ senses in common, despite the fact that various meanings are also available by these forms. An imperfective marker -te i-ru covers the meaning of progressive, resultative, perfect or habitualness while –(I)yor refers to progressive meaning and habitualness. The progressive perfect meaning can be applied to–(I)yor, as long as durativity is concerned (but not as long as termination is concerned). Other than these meanings, –(I)yor also covers the meaning of futurate, presumptive, historical present (HP), ability and imperative which -te i-ru does not denote.
format	article
author	Aytemis DEPCİ
author_facet	Aytemis DEPCİ
author_sort	Aytemis DEPCİ
title	A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR
title_short	A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR
title_full	A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR
title_fullStr	A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR
title_full_unstemmed	A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR
title_sort	contrastive study on japanese and turkish aspect: focus on –te i-ru and –(i)yor
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/bf22fe90417b475cae3e23e7d0abb143
work_keys_str_mv	AT aytemisdepci acontrastivestudyonjapaneseandturkishaspectfocusonteiruandiyor AT aytemisdepci contrastivestudyonjapaneseandturkishaspectfocusonteiruandiyor
_version_	1718415251343409152

A CONTRASTIVE STUDY ON JAPANESE AND TURKISH ASPECT: FOCUS ON –TE I-RU AND –(I)YOR

Ejemplares similares