Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis

Minimally invasive decompression is generally employed for treating lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it results in weakened spinal stability. To augment spinal stability, a new interspinous process device (NIPD) was developed in this study. The biomechanical features of the NIPD were evaluated in th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung-Wen Wei, Shao-Ming Chuang, Chen-Sheng Chen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bf3dcc87b327408ab867b6d6b5fa9c21
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bf3dcc87b327408ab867b6d6b5fa9c21
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bf3dcc87b327408ab867b6d6b5fa9c212021-11-11T15:25:26ZBiomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis10.3390/app1121104862076-3417https://doaj.org/article/bf3dcc87b327408ab867b6d6b5fa9c212021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10486https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417Minimally invasive decompression is generally employed for treating lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it results in weakened spinal stability. To augment spinal stability, a new interspinous process device (NIPD) was developed in this study. The biomechanical features of the NIPD were evaluated in this study. Three finite-element (FE) models of the entire lumbar spine were implemented to perform biomechanical analysis: the intact, defect (DEF), and NIPD models. The DEF model was considered for lumbar spines with bilateral laminotomies and partial discectomy at L3–L4. Range of motion (ROM), disc stress, and facet joint contact force were evaluated in flexion, extension, torsion, and lateral bending in the three FE models. The results indicated that ROM in the extension increased by 23% in the DEF model but decreased by 23% in the NIPD model. In the NIPD model, the cephalic adjacent disc stress in flexion and extension was within 5%, and negligible changes were noted in the facet joint contact force for torsion and lateral bending. Thus, the NIPD offers superior spinal stability and causes only a minor change in cephalic adjacent disc stress in flexion and extension during the bilateral laminotomy and partial discectomy of the lumbar spine. However, the NIPD has a minor influence on the ROM and facet joint force for lateral bending and torsion.Hung-Wen WeiShao-Ming ChuangChen-Sheng ChenMDPI AGarticleinterspinous process devicelumbar spinefinite-element modelbiomechanicsTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10486, p 10486 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic interspinous process device
lumbar spine
finite-element model
biomechanics
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle interspinous process device
lumbar spine
finite-element model
biomechanics
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Hung-Wen Wei
Shao-Ming Chuang
Chen-Sheng Chen
Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis
description Minimally invasive decompression is generally employed for treating lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it results in weakened spinal stability. To augment spinal stability, a new interspinous process device (NIPD) was developed in this study. The biomechanical features of the NIPD were evaluated in this study. Three finite-element (FE) models of the entire lumbar spine were implemented to perform biomechanical analysis: the intact, defect (DEF), and NIPD models. The DEF model was considered for lumbar spines with bilateral laminotomies and partial discectomy at L3–L4. Range of motion (ROM), disc stress, and facet joint contact force were evaluated in flexion, extension, torsion, and lateral bending in the three FE models. The results indicated that ROM in the extension increased by 23% in the DEF model but decreased by 23% in the NIPD model. In the NIPD model, the cephalic adjacent disc stress in flexion and extension was within 5%, and negligible changes were noted in the facet joint contact force for torsion and lateral bending. Thus, the NIPD offers superior spinal stability and causes only a minor change in cephalic adjacent disc stress in flexion and extension during the bilateral laminotomy and partial discectomy of the lumbar spine. However, the NIPD has a minor influence on the ROM and facet joint force for lateral bending and torsion.
format article
author Hung-Wen Wei
Shao-Ming Chuang
Chen-Sheng Chen
author_facet Hung-Wen Wei
Shao-Ming Chuang
Chen-Sheng Chen
author_sort Hung-Wen Wei
title Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis
title_short Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of the lumbar spine by using a new interspinous process device: a finite element analysis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bf3dcc87b327408ab867b6d6b5fa9c21
work_keys_str_mv AT hungwenwei biomechanicalevaluationofthelumbarspinebyusinganewinterspinousprocessdeviceafiniteelementanalysis
AT shaomingchuang biomechanicalevaluationofthelumbarspinebyusinganewinterspinousprocessdeviceafiniteelementanalysis
AT chenshengchen biomechanicalevaluationofthelumbarspinebyusinganewinterspinousprocessdeviceafiniteelementanalysis
_version_ 1718435332264820736