Advocating for the Health Worker

Background: Health workers in both well-resourced and limited income settings face health threats from exposures encountered in their unique and complex work environment. Even before the 2014 Ebola outbreak, preventable harm was routinely felt by health workers, most visibly through the fatal collus...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Melissa McDiarmid
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bf4ab224b9c04cd0adf608313f4ab6ac
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bf4ab224b9c04cd0adf608313f4ab6ac
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bf4ab224b9c04cd0adf608313f4ab6ac2021-12-02T06:59:14ZAdvocating for the Health Worker2214-999610.5334/aogh.2461https://doaj.org/article/bf4ab224b9c04cd0adf608313f4ab6ac2019-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2461https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: Health workers in both well-resourced and limited income settings face health threats from exposures encountered in their unique and complex work environment. Even before the 2014 Ebola outbreak, preventable harm was routinely felt by health workers, most visibly through the fatal collusion between the HIV/AIDS epidemic and tuberculosis (TB) infection in high endemic countries. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to examine the analyses of the health sector workforce by development and public health agencies regarding its sustainability, threats from workersʼ personal health risks and discussion of protections to address those risks. Methods: Development and public health agency reports assessing the sustainability of and threats to the health workforce both pre-and post the 2014 Ebola outbreak were examined with a focus on low and middle- income countries (LMICs). Findings: Reviews of the health sector workforce have largely focused on its role as a necessary component of sustainable development. Hence, staff competency, numbers and productivity have been emphasized with little notice of the conditions of work and the highly hazardous environment contributing to worker out-migration, illness and death. Conclusions: Going forward, the 2016 World Health Assembly campaign to advance human resources for health and other UN efforts on health employment may offer some opportunities to address needed health worker protections. However, to these largely competency-focused workforce development efforts must 'first' be brought resources for and commitment to protecting the safety of these workersʼ lives and livelihood. Doing less defeats investments in fragile health systems and is plainly unethical.Melissa McDiarmidUbiquity PressarticleInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 85, Iss 1 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Melissa McDiarmid
Advocating for the Health Worker
description Background: Health workers in both well-resourced and limited income settings face health threats from exposures encountered in their unique and complex work environment. Even before the 2014 Ebola outbreak, preventable harm was routinely felt by health workers, most visibly through the fatal collusion between the HIV/AIDS epidemic and tuberculosis (TB) infection in high endemic countries. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to examine the analyses of the health sector workforce by development and public health agencies regarding its sustainability, threats from workersʼ personal health risks and discussion of protections to address those risks. Methods: Development and public health agency reports assessing the sustainability of and threats to the health workforce both pre-and post the 2014 Ebola outbreak were examined with a focus on low and middle- income countries (LMICs). Findings: Reviews of the health sector workforce have largely focused on its role as a necessary component of sustainable development. Hence, staff competency, numbers and productivity have been emphasized with little notice of the conditions of work and the highly hazardous environment contributing to worker out-migration, illness and death. Conclusions: Going forward, the 2016 World Health Assembly campaign to advance human resources for health and other UN efforts on health employment may offer some opportunities to address needed health worker protections. However, to these largely competency-focused workforce development efforts must 'first' be brought resources for and commitment to protecting the safety of these workersʼ lives and livelihood. Doing less defeats investments in fragile health systems and is plainly unethical.
format article
author Melissa McDiarmid
author_facet Melissa McDiarmid
author_sort Melissa McDiarmid
title Advocating for the Health Worker
title_short Advocating for the Health Worker
title_full Advocating for the Health Worker
title_fullStr Advocating for the Health Worker
title_full_unstemmed Advocating for the Health Worker
title_sort advocating for the health worker
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/bf4ab224b9c04cd0adf608313f4ab6ac
work_keys_str_mv AT melissamcdiarmid advocatingforthehealthworker
_version_ 1718399658788651008