Debating Arab Authoritarianism
The Middle East has long contended with the title of the region most lacking in democratic state structures, and while several countries endeavor to enforce a form of democracy, yet others preserve the frameworks that efficiently sustain their monarchies, revenue, and power status in the area. The...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/bf4dc68d5dc44b0e8b3b3a9a48e3800c |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:bf4dc68d5dc44b0e8b3b3a9a48e3800c |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:bf4dc68d5dc44b0e8b3b3a9a48e3800c2021-12-02T17:49:40ZDebating Arab Authoritarianism10.35632/ajis.v26i1.14162690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/bf4dc68d5dc44b0e8b3b3a9a48e3800c2009-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1416https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 The Middle East has long contended with the title of the region most lacking in democratic state structures, and while several countries endeavor to enforce a form of democracy, yet others preserve the frameworks that efficiently sustain their monarchies, revenue, and power status in the area. The twin questions of how and why democracy has proved elusive in theMiddle East forms the crux of the collection of essays comprised within Schlumberger’s tome: Debating Arab Authoritarianism: Dynamics and Durability in Nondemocratic Regimes. Spanning Morocco to Oman, via Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, the authoritarian mode of governance is surveyed through an assessment of the durability of regimes, the role of Islamist political parties, intra-regime dynamics, and the economic aspects of political reform. Divided into four sections, the book’s structure incorporates key elements of Arab authoritarianism: “State-Society Relations and Political Opposition,” “The Regimes,” “The Economy and the Polity,” and “The InternationalArena.” That the sections retain a subtle reluctance to address the link between the repressive capacities ofArab states and their longevity, as well as the concept that Islam is incompatible with democracy, is conspicuous, yet prudent. Far from retreadingworn theories, the contributors provide fresh conceptual and comparative analyses of individual countries and the region on a wider level, in addition to prospects for the respective regimes ... K. Luisa GandolfoInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 26, Iss 1 (2009) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Islam BP1-253 |
| spellingShingle |
Islam BP1-253 K. Luisa Gandolfo Debating Arab Authoritarianism |
| description |
The Middle East has long contended with the title of the region most lacking
in democratic state structures, and while several countries endeavor to
enforce a form of democracy, yet others preserve the frameworks that efficiently
sustain their monarchies, revenue, and power status in the area. The
twin questions of how and why democracy has proved elusive in theMiddle
East forms the crux of the collection of essays comprised within Schlumberger’s
tome: Debating Arab Authoritarianism: Dynamics and Durability
in Nondemocratic Regimes.
Spanning Morocco to Oman, via Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, the
authoritarian mode of governance is surveyed through an assessment of the
durability of regimes, the role of Islamist political parties, intra-regime
dynamics, and the economic aspects of political reform. Divided into four
sections, the book’s structure incorporates key elements of Arab authoritarianism:
“State-Society Relations and Political Opposition,” “The Regimes,”
“The Economy and the Polity,” and “The InternationalArena.” That the sections
retain a subtle reluctance to address the link between the repressive
capacities ofArab states and their longevity, as well as the concept that Islam
is incompatible with democracy, is conspicuous, yet prudent. Far from
retreadingworn theories, the contributors provide fresh conceptual and comparative
analyses of individual countries and the region on a wider level, in
addition to prospects for the respective regimes ...
|
| format |
article |
| author |
K. Luisa Gandolfo |
| author_facet |
K. Luisa Gandolfo |
| author_sort |
K. Luisa Gandolfo |
| title |
Debating Arab Authoritarianism |
| title_short |
Debating Arab Authoritarianism |
| title_full |
Debating Arab Authoritarianism |
| title_fullStr |
Debating Arab Authoritarianism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Debating Arab Authoritarianism |
| title_sort |
debating arab authoritarianism |
| publisher |
International Institute of Islamic Thought |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/bf4dc68d5dc44b0e8b3b3a9a48e3800c |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT kluisagandolfo debatingarabauthoritarianism |
| _version_ |
1718379431880294400 |