Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin

Over the last three decades, state intervention through urban regeneration has focused on ‘fixing’ perceived social and spatial vulnerabilities within particular neighbourhoods, communities or city spaces but has often generated new urban crises. Previous research examining regeneration over signif...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Niamh Moore-Cherry
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES
Publicado:	Asociación Española de Geografía 2020
Materias:	urban regeneration governance neoliberal cities entrepreneurial urban governance vulnerability Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geography (General) G1-922
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bf4ede83377743e79c7f9154c5716f27
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bf4ede83377743e79c7f9154c5716f27
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bf4ede83377743e79c7f9154c5716f272021-12-01T10:42:39ZUrban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin10.21138/bage.30040212-94262605-3322https://doaj.org/article/bf4ede83377743e79c7f9154c5716f272020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.bage.age-geografia.es/ojs/index.php/bage/article/view/3004https://doaj.org/toc/0212-9426https://doaj.org/toc/2605-3322 Over the last three decades, state intervention through urban regeneration has focused on ‘fixing’ perceived social and spatial vulnerabilities within particular neighbourhoods, communities or city spaces but has often generated new urban crises. Previous research examining regeneration over significant periods of time in the UK and Ireland, suggests that often the same spaces and communities are subject to repeated rounds of intervention. In this paper, the thirty year trajectory of regeneration in Dublin Docklands is examined. The importance of global flows of capital and how they are mediated by local contexts, actors and institutions through roll-back, roll-out and roll-with-it forms of neoliberalisation are examined. Since the global financial crisis, neoliberal governmentalities have been more deeply embedded in place through new institutions and the formation of a new growth machine that has produced new vulnerabilities. Dublin Docklands has been successfully commodified and marketized through the sustenance, albeit changing, of a growth logic over more than 30 years. Yet significant challenges related to governance, social inclusion and spatial justice remain, and arguably have been (un-) intentionally co-produced in new forms by sustained rounds of state intervention. Niamh Moore-CherryAsociación Española de Geografíaarticleurban regenerationgovernanceneoliberal citiesentrepreneurial urban governancevulnerabilityEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Geography (General)G1-922ENESBoletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, Iss 87 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES
topic	urban regeneration governance neoliberal cities entrepreneurial urban governance vulnerability Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geography (General) G1-922
spellingShingle	urban regeneration governance neoliberal cities entrepreneurial urban governance vulnerability Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geography (General) G1-922 Niamh Moore-Cherry Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin
description	Over the last three decades, state intervention through urban regeneration has focused on ‘fixing’ perceived social and spatial vulnerabilities within particular neighbourhoods, communities or city spaces but has often generated new urban crises. Previous research examining regeneration over significant periods of time in the UK and Ireland, suggests that often the same spaces and communities are subject to repeated rounds of intervention. In this paper, the thirty year trajectory of regeneration in Dublin Docklands is examined. The importance of global flows of capital and how they are mediated by local contexts, actors and institutions through roll-back, roll-out and roll-with-it forms of neoliberalisation are examined. Since the global financial crisis, neoliberal governmentalities have been more deeply embedded in place through new institutions and the formation of a new growth machine that has produced new vulnerabilities. Dublin Docklands has been successfully commodified and marketized through the sustenance, albeit changing, of a growth logic over more than 30 years. Yet significant challenges related to governance, social inclusion and spatial justice remain, and arguably have been (un-) intentionally co-produced in new forms by sustained rounds of state intervention.
format	article
author	Niamh Moore-Cherry
author_facet	Niamh Moore-Cherry
author_sort	Niamh Moore-Cherry
title	Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin
title_short	Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin
title_full	Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin
title_fullStr	Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin
title_full_unstemmed	Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin
title_sort	urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in dublin
publisher	Asociación Española de Geografía
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/bf4ede83377743e79c7f9154c5716f27
work_keys_str_mv	AT niamhmoorecherry urbanredevelopmentgovernanceandvulnerabilitythirtyyearsofregenerationindublin
_version_	1718405321326592000

Urban redevelopment, governance and vulnerability: thirty years of ‘regeneration’ in Dublin

Ejemplares similares