Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study

Abstract Background Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD. Methods From January 2016 t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He Zhang, Wei Xie, Yuzhou Lu, Tuo Pan, Qing Zhou, Yunxing Xue, Dongjin Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bf6157ce827b4a44abb019679da74b22
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bf6157ce827b4a44abb019679da74b22
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bf6157ce827b4a44abb019679da74b222021-11-14T12:33:54ZDouble arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study10.1186/s13019-021-01714-51749-8090https://doaj.org/article/bf6157ce827b4a44abb019679da74b222021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01714-5https://doaj.org/toc/1749-8090Abstract Background Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD. Methods From January 2016 to December 2018, 431 ATAAD patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into DAC group (n = 341) and RAC group (n = 90). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the early and mid-term outcomes between these two groups. To confirm the organ protection effect by DAC, intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters were compared between the two groups. Results Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between two groups, while patients in DAC group were younger than RAC group (51.55 ± 13.21 vs. 56.07 ± 12.16 years, P < 0.001). DAC had a higher incidence of limb malperfusion (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.063) and lower incidence of coronary malperfusion (5.3% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.019). No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was found between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality was 13.5% (58/431), while there was no difference between the two groups (13.5% vs. 13.3%; P = 0.969). Patients who underwent DAC had higher incidence of postoperative stroke (5.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.019) and lower incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (24.7% vs. 40.3%; P = 0.015). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 (interquartile range, 25–45) months, the overall survival was 81.5% for DAC group and 78.0% for RAC group (P = 0.560). Intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters showed that DAC group had more intraoperative urine output volume than RAC group (P = 0.05), and the time of cooling (P = 0.04) and rewarming (P = 0.04) were shorter in DAC group. Conclusions DAC will not increase the surgical risks compared to RAC, but could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI which may be benefit for renal protection.He ZhangWei XieYuzhou LuTuo PanQing ZhouYunxing XueDongjin WangBMCarticleAortic dissectionCannulationMalperfusionSurgeryRD1-811AnesthesiologyRD78.3-87.3ENJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Aortic dissection
Cannulation
Malperfusion
Surgery
RD1-811
Anesthesiology
RD78.3-87.3
spellingShingle Aortic dissection
Cannulation
Malperfusion
Surgery
RD1-811
Anesthesiology
RD78.3-87.3
He Zhang
Wei Xie
Yuzhou Lu
Tuo Pan
Qing Zhou
Yunxing Xue
Dongjin Wang
Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study
description Abstract Background Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD. Methods From January 2016 to December 2018, 431 ATAAD patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into DAC group (n = 341) and RAC group (n = 90). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the early and mid-term outcomes between these two groups. To confirm the organ protection effect by DAC, intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters were compared between the two groups. Results Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between two groups, while patients in DAC group were younger than RAC group (51.55 ± 13.21 vs. 56.07 ± 12.16 years, P < 0.001). DAC had a higher incidence of limb malperfusion (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.063) and lower incidence of coronary malperfusion (5.3% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.019). No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was found between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality was 13.5% (58/431), while there was no difference between the two groups (13.5% vs. 13.3%; P = 0.969). Patients who underwent DAC had higher incidence of postoperative stroke (5.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.019) and lower incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (24.7% vs. 40.3%; P = 0.015). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 (interquartile range, 25–45) months, the overall survival was 81.5% for DAC group and 78.0% for RAC group (P = 0.560). Intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters showed that DAC group had more intraoperative urine output volume than RAC group (P = 0.05), and the time of cooling (P = 0.04) and rewarming (P = 0.04) were shorter in DAC group. Conclusions DAC will not increase the surgical risks compared to RAC, but could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI which may be benefit for renal protection.
format article
author He Zhang
Wei Xie
Yuzhou Lu
Tuo Pan
Qing Zhou
Yunxing Xue
Dongjin Wang
author_facet He Zhang
Wei Xie
Yuzhou Lu
Tuo Pan
Qing Zhou
Yunxing Xue
Dongjin Wang
author_sort He Zhang
title Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study
title_short Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study
title_full Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study
title_sort double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type a aortic dissection: a retrospective study
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bf6157ce827b4a44abb019679da74b22
work_keys_str_mv AT hezhang doublearterialcannulationversusrightaxillaryarterycannulationforacutetypeaaorticdissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT weixie doublearterialcannulationversusrightaxillaryarterycannulationforacutetypeaaorticdissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT yuzhoulu doublearterialcannulationversusrightaxillaryarterycannulationforacutetypeaaorticdissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT tuopan doublearterialcannulationversusrightaxillaryarterycannulationforacutetypeaaorticdissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT qingzhou doublearterialcannulationversusrightaxillaryarterycannulationforacutetypeaaorticdissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT yunxingxue doublearterialcannulationversusrightaxillaryarterycannulationforacutetypeaaorticdissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT dongjinwang doublearterialcannulationversusrightaxillaryarterycannulationforacutetypeaaorticdissectionaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1718429191146307584